- Thread Author
- #1
Rest in peace.
By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!
Get StartedTHE Ravens are a complete different franchise. Its not similar to Washington Senators becoming the Twins. Or the Philadelphia Athletics becoming Oakland. So it does make sense.I was just getting savvy to professional sports when Brown retired. The only time I saw him on TV was the 1965 NFL Championship (1-2-1966); the last before the Super Bowl was instituted. It was a mud bath, and it was Brown's final game.
Article."The Cleveland Browns are one of four franchises that have never appeared in a Super Bowl. Jim Brown is the one player who could have changed that."I agree with the second statement, if the author is referring to the old franchise. But we all know that the Browns/Ravens have won a Super Bowl and that Brown never played for the expansion Cleveland Browns. So, actually, this assertion makes no sense.
THE Ravens are a complete different franchise. Its not similar to Washington Senators becoming the Twins. Or the Philadelphia Athletics becoming Oakland. So it does make sense.
They don't share the same history.They are exactly like those two examples. The Browns franchise was in Cleveland, they left Cleveland & moved to Baltimore, then changed their name to the Ravens.
They don't share the same history.
Subsequent legal actions by the city of Cleveland and Browns season ticket holders led the NFL to broker a compromise in which Modell agreed to return the Browns franchise to the league. The agreement explicitly stipulated that the Browns franchise, including its history, records and intellectual property, were to remain in Cleveland. In exchange, the NFL agreed to grant Modell a new franchise in Baltimore (which was eventually named the Ravens)
Yes you would think but I always consider the same franchise if they shared history, stats. The alternative would have been Browns became Ravens and then a new franchise awarded to the Browns. That sounds weird.I didn't realize the city sued and the NFL said that the Ravens were an "expansion team"
I guess "legally" but in reality, everyone knows that the Browns left Cleveland and became the Ravens. I mean, the entire organization, players, staff, etc. was an expansion team?
Just an conversation. .Didn't intend to plug this thread with an unimportant observation. Withdrawn.
Founded in 2011, Detroit Sports Forum is a community of fanatics dedicated to teams like the Lions, Tigers, Pistons, Red Wings, Wolverines, and more. We live and breathe Detroit sports!