Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

WMU Game Program (deptch chart included)

Interesting.....Things to note:

-Will Campbell is behind Mike Martin
-Will Heininger is the starting DE...? Where did that come from
-Shaw and Toussaint are listed as "Or" so it seems the battle for the starting RB spot continues
-Same goes for the other CB spot where Floyd and Avery are listed as "Or"
 
Did you happen to catch who's starting at SS? I haven't looked at it yet...
 
DR said:
Did you happen to catch who's starting at SS? I haven't looked at it yet...

Yes, I was wrong. The only way I will be right is if Kovacs has some injury between now and gameday. Did we bet anything? I can't remember - if so, I will follow through on it. But I will say that I was at least right about one of them.

However, M Rob is at the #2 spot - which is what I always complained about, and got crap for, because RR was using him as a LB and everyone said I was stupid for thinking he was a safety.
 
MAIZEandBLUE09 said:
DR said:
Did you happen to catch who's starting at SS? I haven't looked at it yet...

Yes, I was wrong. The only way I will be right is if Kovacs has some injury between now and gameday. Did we bet anything? I can't remember - if so, I will follow through on it. But I will say that I was at least right about one of them.

However, M Rob is at the #2 spot - which is what I always complained about, and got crap for, because RR was using him as a LB and everyone said I was stupid for thinking he was a safety.

We did bet, winner picks a username for the loser. Has to keep it for a week.

What do you mean you were right about one of them?

And I called you stupid for saying Robinson should spedifically play FS, not just safety. Though it sounds like he has gotten some work at FS throughout practice, so it wasn't as far fetched as I thought.
 
DR said:
MAIZEandBLUE09 said:
Yes, I was wrong. The only way I will be right is if Kovacs has some injury between now and gameday. Did we bet anything? I can't remember - if so, I will follow through on it. But I will say that I was at least right about one of them.

However, M Rob is at the #2 spot - which is what I always complained about, and got crap for, because RR was using him as a LB and everyone said I was stupid for thinking he was a safety.

We did bet, winner picks a username for the loser. Has to keep it for a week.

What do you mean you were right about one of them?

And I called you stupid for saying Robinson should spedifically play FS, not just safety. Though it sounds like he has gotten some work at FS throughout practice, so it wasn't as far fetched as I thought.

I was right about Vinopal who was the other half of our argument - that neither would be starting this year.

You tell me my name and when you want the week to start and I'll do it - and if you want me to do it here or on the main board (if it exists beyond Sep 1st).
 
MAIZEandBLUE09 said:
DR said:
We did bet, winner picks a username for the loser. Has to keep it for a week.

What do you mean you were right about one of them?

And I called you stupid for saying Robinson should spedifically play FS, not just safety. Though it sounds like he has gotten some work at FS throughout practice, so it wasn't as far fetched as I thought.

I was right about Vinopal who was the other half of our argument - that neither would be starting this year.

You tell me my name and when you want the week to start and I'll do it - and if you want me to do it here or on the main board (if it exists beyond Sep 1st).

Well, congrats, but I never argued that Vinopal would or should start. He was always separate from Kovacs in our argument.

I'll let you know. I'm not trying to jinx anything...
 
Back
Top