Wide spread election fraud 2020

[tigermud]

I can really see now why Parler appeals to you. That's fine, to each their own.



Don't get the high road mixed up with your high horse. Damn.

LOL I do enjoy occasionally gas lighting you people also.

 

[tinselwolverine]

The places he won, are where all the people are. I don't know how many ways there are to explain this.

Pew Research Center shows data that Republicans consistently win substantially more counties - yes, Republicans win more where less people live - which is most of the country.

Everybody knows this.

Of the two miserable old bastards, I would have preferred Trump to win, much in the same way given no alternative, I would prefer to be shot in the head to being boiled in oil.

Despite his often horrific comportment, I think he would have had a better handle on things than senile old Joe, who truly is lost in a fog.

But I don?t care that much, and it looks like team Trump?s claims - I don?t see any ?there? there.

Looks like Biden won, fair and square.

 

[sggatecl]

Despite his often horrific comportment, I think he would have had a better handle on things than senile old Joe, who truly is lost in a fog.

My hope with Joe, which was actually the same with Trump in 2016, is that he will surround himself with people that know their shit and will make sure sound decisions and advice are provided.

If he's appointing his kids and their spouses to senior roles, I expect similiar numbskull decisions to keep being made. It wasn't the norm before this administration, hopefully we can look back on it being an aberration.

 

[Michchamp]

My hope with Joe, which was actually the same with Trump in 2016, is that he will surround himself with people that know their shit and will make sure sound decisions and advice are provided.

...

I don't think such Americans actually exist anymore.



One of the more horrifying things I read noted how badly these same people botched the Obamacare roll out (though the cynic in me thinks that was partly intentional), and also speculated that as a nation we've lost the ability to function.



Anyone who would rather do things like "build a website that works" or "make sure everyone who needs food gets it" have been elbowed out for people who don't care if the website works, or people go hungry, as long as corporate donors get contracts to operate them.



And if these things don't work... well, they can just blame "government" and demand even more money to hand out to the same parties that failed in the first place.

 

[tigermud]

The planned “Build Back Better” post global reset under Harris/Biden will spare no one other than the very top .01 percent

 

[sggatecl]

The planned ?Build Back Better? post global reset under Harris/Biden will spare no one other than the very top .01 percent

Careful, that's how you summon Bernie Sanders.

 

[Thumb]

PA will be decided by their legislative

Pennsylvania Judge Patricia A. McCullough ruled that the Pennsylvania preliminary ELECTION CERTIFICATION injunction was PROPERLY ISSUED and should be upheld.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...ives-state-legislators-power-choose-electors/

You wont read this but:

https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/28/politics/pennsylvania-state-supreme-court-election-case/index.html

It's not just Rudy who is failing...maybe the problem is that widespread voter fraud did not really exist just because you wanted it to.

 

[Gulo Blue]

I'm genuinely curious how Parler is going to navigate the free speech issues any differently than the other platforms. They've already had to start down paths that require interpretation like bans on span and vulgar material.

 

[Gulo Blue]

Apparently, membership doubled to 10 million in November.

 

[byco42]

Forums like this are superior to social media, IMO, in that topics get thrashed and we attach a semblance of humanity and personalities to our posts. Selective information is not suppressed here as on Twitter. And we are, usually, not banned. It takes a lot to earn that.

 

[Gulo Blue]

In 2016, I think I saw a conspiracy theory claiming the Trump had ties to casino machine makers that also made voting machines.

 

[Spartanmack]

It is strange how Republicans can't win elections anymore unless some court helps them. They disenfranchised millions of votes and then cry foul when their loudmouth lying sitting president gets blown out by a old Democrat and a women running mate..

Trump was freaking smashed at the voting window compared to 2016 but sadly bullies have to try steal the election.

It's strange how ignorant of facts you can be. what court helped in 2016 - you know, the election the Dems have been trying to steal since before the inauguration. How about all the governorships? Did Republicans use the courts to win the Senate in 2010. Which courts helped them gain 11 seats in the house (by the way, at last count they're also leading all 8 undecided races).

Seriously though, even if you're right - having the courts make legitimate legal decisions for fair elections is certainly preferable to having to engage in shady, questionable and potentially fraudulent activities to win elections, like the Dems have been doing in urban America for decades.

 

[Spartanmack]

What I highlighted isn’t unusual - lots of people show up and only vote for president - I learned this almost a half century ago in Junior High civics.

Undervoting.

I don’t know who counted the ballots that singularly voted for Trump, but my guess is the results would be similar.

I haven't seen a source for it so it's unconfirmed but I saw a stat that these undervoted ballots in certain jurisdictions (mostly urban, dem leaning) went massively disproportionately for Biden. It DID NOT say whether that was a counter trend result so maybe that's also not out of the ordinary, but if it's true - why are urban voters that much more likely not to vote down ticket? And just because it's a consistent trend, doesn't mean it's legitimate. It could be a form of cheating that's been going on for decades. I don't understand why people are so opposed to these things being investigated. If it's legit, the investigation should show that.

 

[Gulo Blue]

Undervoting theory. In the country, I learn names of downballot candidates. Even like soil and water posts have signs along the road. None of that exists downtown. Maybe the effect of signs is small, but if it is, why do people put up so many signs?

 

[Spartanmack]

Forums like this are superior to social media, IMO, in that topics get thrashed and we attach a semblance of humanity and personalities to our posts. Selective information is not suppressed here as on Twitter. And we are, usually, not banned. It takes a lot to earn that.

It definitely does not take a lot.

 

[tinselwolverine]

I haven't seen a source for it so it's unconfirmed but I saw a stat that these undervoted ballots in certain jurisdictions (mostly urban, dem leaning) went massively disproportionately for Biden. It DID NOT say whether that was a counter trend result so maybe that's also not out of the ordinary, but if it's true - why are urban voters that much more likely not to vote down ticket? And just because it's a consistent trend, doesn't mean it's legitimate. It could be a form of cheating that's been going on for decades. I don't understand why people are so opposed to these things being investigated. If it's legit, the investigation should show that.

Undervoting comparisons of D as opposed to R and urban as opposed to not urban should be able to be investigated easily.

 

[Gulo Blue]

...and what would be the motivation to cheat in one race, but not all, especially if doing that made your ballots stick out more?

 

[Thumb]

I haven't seen a source for it so it's unconfirmed but I saw a stat that these undervoted ballots in certain jurisdictions (mostly urban, dem leaning) went massively disproportionately for Biden. It DID NOT say whether that was a counter trend result so maybe that's also not out of the ordinary, but if it's true - why are urban voters that much more likely not to vote down ticket? And just because it's a consistent trend, doesn't mean it's legitimate. It could be a form of cheating that's been going on for decades. I don't understand why people are so opposed to these things being investigated. If it's legit, the investigation should show that.

Investigate everything.

That's okay with me, and I would suspect most people. The issue is not with these things being investigated, but that before investigations even happen we get people (you included) that start saying there has been massive fraud, election stolen, etc. we get lawsuits that offer up 0 discovery evidence, and then get tossed out, and the losing side claims the judges are in on it (many times it had been republican judges or judge panels) and it a giant conspiracy.

BTW, every recount/audit that has happened had upheld the original results.

So yeah, investigate everything, but it will change nothing, especially the reaction from the losing team, nothing short of a full reversal will satisfy them.

 

[Spartanmack]

criminals are dumb, they do stupid shit all the time.

 

[Gulo Blue]

Wasn't that long ago investigation = witch hunt.