Spartanmack
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2013
- Messages
- 17,539
well, on the "news for idiots" sites you read, sure there were lots of "scandals."
but in the realm outside Breitbart, Alex Jones, Fox News, Daily Caller, etc. where grownups live, there needs to be some actual evidence supporting a claim of law-breaking or corruption before it can be considered a scandal, not just a confused flowchart scribbled on a chalkboard by some wild-eyed lunatic...
The funny thing is I don't read any of those sites or watch Fox News or the Blaze. In the real world, where grownups live with their heads not buried in the sand - outside your MSNBC, Slate, Politico bubble - you don't have to look far (just read reports directly from the FBI, watch testimony before congress, etc) to see there's ample proof of these scandals you brush aside after listening to Rachel Maddow, George Stephanopolous and Brian Williams tell you that proof isn't actually proof.
Last edited: