Michchamp
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2011
- Messages
- 34,242
Cherry-picking The Gospel--that you reject--disqualifies you to use any of it to prove a point, unless you believe every word of it.
It's an all-or-nothing kind of thing.
The "tribute to Caesar" question was meant to be a trap that Jesus circumvented by nullifying the original question: "Tell us therefore what dost thou think, is it lawful to give tribute to Caesar, or not?" If he answered yes, then he was rendering Himself irrelevant. It he answered no, he was treasonous.
(Matthew 22:15-22)
15 Then the Pharisees going, consulted among themselves how to insnare him in his speech.
16 And they sent to him their disciples with the Herodians, saying: Master, we know that thou art a true speaker, and teachest the way of God in truth, neither carest thou for any man: for thou dost not regard the person of men.
17 Tell us therefore what dost thou think, is it lawful to give tribute to Caesar, or not?
18 But Jesus knowing their wickedness, said: Why do you tempt me, ye hypocrites?
19 Shew me the coin of the tribute. And they offered him a penny.
20 And Jesus saith to them: Whose image and inscription is this?
21 They say to him: Caesar's. Then he saith to them: Render therefore to Caesar the things that are Caesar's; and to God, the things that are God's.
22 And hearing this they wondered, and leaving him, went their ways.
The context of this pathetic challenge was that Jesus was admonishing the Pharisees for rejecting Him, and they didn't much take to that.
well, you have your interpretation of the Bible, and I have mine.