Spartanmack
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2013
- Messages
- 17,533
We all know Russia killed more Germans in WWII.... Germany lost 7 to 9 Million people...The Soviet Union lost 21-28 Million depending on the Figures you us.. As you said most of those were on the eastern front... Not sure what we should do with Putin but he is a real problem right now...Although I do think Nato and the American Military are a lot better then Putin's guys..
Exactly.
The German military is state of the art. The Russian military is not.
Russia has the advantage in sheer numbers of planes, tanks, etc. but much of it is decades old.
Germany has the technological advantage.
Remember the Republican Guard in Iraq was once like the 5th or 6th largest standing army in the world...what did they last against superior technology and state of the art weapons systems? A few weeks?
Yes NATO forces combined are clearly more powerful than Russia but that's mostly because the US ex-the rest of NATO is far superior militarily to Russia but that's not the point. The original statement was something like Merkel could probably crush Russia easier than Hitler did - she couldn't and Hitler didn't.
By the way, the Republican Guard was not the 5th or 6th largest standing army, it was the elite division of the Iraqi military. The much larger number of regulars was what made their army so big. And Iraq had fought a >10 year war with Iran that decimated its military and nearly bankrupted the country - Sadam could barely feed let alone pay his army. That's why they invaded Kuwait. Iraq didn't have the nearly the military budget Russia has - they're not even close to comparable. Any technological edge Germany may have is probably not huge - certainly nothing like the spread between the US and Iraq. If Germany could smack Putin down so easily, why does Europe want us to build the missile defense system so badly.
Last edited: