Spartanmack
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2013
- Messages
- 17,531
ah yeah, you're right. I conflated the year with the number.
This site reports 1,183.
talking about whether these killings are justified:
The report found that most killings by police begin with traffic stops, mental health checks, domestic disturbances, and other non-violent offenses where no crime was alleged. One in three police killings began with an alleged violent crime.
It's not the year 2150 or 2200 yet. I don't think you conflated anything, you either doubled it or pulled it out of your ass thinking you wouldn't be fact checked (like you always do).
I like your piece though - doesn't sound at all biased. By far the most frequent reason for initial interaction with police of a police involved killings is alleged violent crime (32%), but they add up Traffic Violations (7%), mental health checks (9%), domestic disturbances (8%), and other non violent crimes to mislead the reader. It's misleading for other reasons as well because it doesn't really matter why the people had the initial interaction with the cops. What matters is what happened after that interaction. To just assume the cops are the ones that escalate these things because they're a bunch of trigger happy licensed-to-kill racist murderers is just stupid and completely unsupported by any evidence.
But I think the best part of your link is in the first paragraph where they say "forest protector" Tortuguita shot by Georgia State Police, not only NOT mentioning he shot a Georgia State Trooper, but also calling him a "non-violent lover of nature." That's not at all misleading or biased but I'm not surprised you didn't question that. You have to be pretty f'n dumb to take these people seriously.
Last edited: