Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Full Circle Ice Age, Warming, Ice Age

Climate Change involves extreme temperature fluctuations & variations from the norm, both colder and hotter, as well as abnormal weather events both in precipitation, wind speed and upper atmosphere disturbance-turbulence and/or the lack of them.

But hey, go ahead and compare relatively short solar cycles to the predicted permanence of man-caused Climate Change..lol.
 
Looks like we might be going back to predictions of ice age doom and gloom again. Full Circle..

Can't everybody just admit nobody has any fkn clue what the weather will be like two days from now...

No.

I will not admit that.

All of my life all I had to do was listen to the weather forecasts on radio or television or read the forecast in the newspaper, and now I look on the internet, and I would have a pretty good idea what the weather was going to be in two days almost every time.

Every once in a while unexpected meteorological events would make things a little different than the meteorologists who provide that information were predicting, but for the most part, almost always spot on.

For example, the weather where I am today is EXACTLY as what was being predicted two days ago.

I am 99% certain that the weather where I will be tomorrow (which is the same place as I am today) will be EXACTLY what was being predicted for tomorrow yesterday.
 
No.

I will not admit that.

All of my life all I had to do was listen to the weather forecasts on radio or television or read the forecast in the newspaper, and now I look on the internet, and I would have a pretty good idea what the weather was going to be in two days almost every time.

Every once in a while unexpected meteorological events would make things a little different than the meteorologists who provide that information were predicting, but for the most part, almost always spot on.

For example, the weather where I am today is EXACTLY as what was being predicted two days ago.

I am 99% certain that the weather where I will be tomorrow (which is the same place as I am today) will be EXACTLY what was being predicted for tomorrow yesterday.

You're in CA right? Your weather may be more predicable currently as compared to other parts of the country as the geo engineering control fkd up the jet stream and dried you out

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/...eering-is-turning-the-state-into-a-dust-bowl/
 
Last edited:
Doesn't really matter to me personally, since more than likely, I won't be still alive when this shitstorm really hits the fan anyway.

I also will not be leaving behind any progeny that might have to figure out how to deal with it either.

A good example is the amount of atmospheric fallout that I noticed on the surface of my new black pickup truck after it sat in rainfall here in SE MI and when compared to the noticeable lack of it, when I vacationed in NW lower MI the same summer.

The global corporate capitalists have and are shifting their heavy industry and manufacturing off-shore to Asian and SE Asian nations that have far fewer if any profit-choking pollution regulations, so I don't know how much effect curbing it in the so-called "free" world would have.
 
Last edited:
You're in CA right?

When I lived in Michigan in my youth, the weather predictions for two days later were also pretty accurate.

Whenever I travel, both in the U.S., North America or abroad, I check the weather where I am/where I'm going to be, and the forecasts for two later later are usually pretty accurate.

Quite precise meteorological predictability for a period of two days is not a California phenomenon.
 
When I lived in Michigan in my youth, the weather predictions for two days later were also pretty accurate.

Whenever I travel, both in the U.S., North America or abroad, I check the weather where I am/where I'm going to be, and the forecasts for two later later are usually pretty accurate.

Quite precise meteorological predictability for a period of two days is not a California phenomenon.

i also remember the forcast here being much more accurate years ago than they are today as well..now a days check it again every 12 hours and it's often not quiet the same as it was 12 hours previous..
 
Last edited:
i also remember the forcast here being much more accurate years ago than they are today as well..now a days check it again every 12 hours and it's often different already...

I don't know much about meteorological science...I don't know if there have been technological changes that allow more accurate short term prediction adjustments than there used to be, and it just seems that the predictions are less accurate because of that...

It's counter intuitive that predictability would be less as technology advances...

EDIT: Meanwhile, figurative rain continues to pour down upon the Detroit Tigers...
 
Last edited:
I don't know much about meteorological science...I don't know if there have been technological changes that allow more accurate short term prediction adjustments than there used to be, and it just seems that the predictions are less accurate because of that...

It's counter intuitive that predictability would be less as technology advances...

EDIT: Meanwhile, figurative rain continues to pour down upon the Detroit Tigers...

Perhaps..

I'm not watching them bums anymore...time to get up on outta here for a bit
 
Keep in mind that the scientists predicting a potential "Maunder minimum" are doing so based on just another model. Models can be useful but they can also be bullshit. Like the Penn State fraud, Michael Mann, whose model was responsible for the hockey stick temperature graph. Complete bullshit. Or the frauds at East Anglia University in the UK who buried e-mails that included data that contradicted their bogus predictions based on their bogus models.
 
The weather forecasts are becoming more accurate in temperature predictions over a 5-day period, however, their precipitation forecasts and cloud-cover can still be somewhat off until ~the day before it is predicted to occur.

Last winter, one of our local TV evening news meteorologists forecasted a low of 8 below zero by early next morning, and then that next AM, he seemed to be genuinely upset that it had yet to drop to zero. An hour later it finally hit 2 below, and he had a big wide grin on his face.
 
Last edited:
There are a few folks out there that believe any climate change is caused by the sun. It is really interesting. Apparently, the last ice age ended around 1850 when the sun perked up. Now, it is "going to sleep" which will lead to an ice age soon.
 
Imagine that the Sun isn't a big factor in climate change..lol yeah who wudda thunk
 
463.jpg
 

still preferable to tLiar's rampant Republitardism.

conspiracy theorist types are mostly harmless; just watch out for them convincing the occasional nutjob to blow up a random Federal building here or there, and we're ok. it's not like the have any sort of coherent political platform that could be put into action. would make for good X-files episode plot material, but that's about it.
 
Back
Top