Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Game 15: Bucs @ Lions *Saturday* Thread

And yes the defense blows. But Matt still doesn't do enough imo.
 
Last edited:
Or maybe you aren't.

Lol lions would be 0-16 without Stafford. Were almost .500 with him and .000 without for last season. People act like other teams don?t have shitty quarterbacks who still win 5-6 games because they actually have players elsewhere on the team. Bears are a great example, Washington, Eagles, San Fran, Carolina, Miami, New York Giants, Dallas, Denver. Shit the JETS have more wins than Matthew Staffords backups the last two seasons. But he manages to carry this team on his back. Without him this team is hopeless. Doesn?t even feel like a slight possibility.
 
Lol lions would be 0-16 without Stafford. Were almost .500 with him and .000 without for last season. People act like other teams don?t have shitty quarterbacks who still win 5-6 games because they actually have players elsewhere on the team. Bears are a great example, Washington, Eagles, San Fran, Carolina, Miami, New York Giants, Dallas, Denver. Shit the JETS have more wins than Matthew Staffords backups the last two seasons. But he manages to carry this team on his back. Without him this team is hopeless. Doesn?t even feel like a slight possibility.
How are we almost .500 with him. Not this season, certainly not career .. 74-88-1. He might be better with a better team but he certainly isn't elite or top 5. He doesn't do enough, can't make the play when we need it.
 
Fans hating on Stafford still aren't paying attention. Literally lions have the worst roster in the league the last two years without him.

The thing is, its ALWAYS something. Apparently he just needs too much to make him great. You give any qb a great line, running game and defense they'd win games.
 
And that's because we always have the worst backup in the league.
 
I thought Brady might have a hard time getting 40 this season, started with 32. He might get to 40 today.
 
Nope. They might not be as good as Matt but certainly better than Daniels and who ever else we've had.

It just appears that way because when we play backups they look like starters vs our defense. The rest of the season they go back to garbage. Just like Daniels when he beat us on the bears team two years ago.
 
Back
Top