Intelligent briefings

[biggunsbob]

It's time for both parties to get thier briefings!!!!!

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/07/29/how-intelligence-briefings-for-trump-clinton-will-work/


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/29/u...p-hillary-clinton-intelligence-briefings.html

 

[Monster]

Just waiting for Trump to lose his mind over some info that he's given and run straight to twitter with it. Seriously, does anybody doubt this is going to happen?

 

[biggunsbob]

Yeah no kidding .. He sure is a loose cannon ,,

 

[tomdalton22]

he'll open his mouth in an interview and she will post it on instagram. They are both right...neither of them are qualified.

 

[biggunsbob]

he'll open his mouth in an interview and she will post it on instagram. They are both right...neither of them are qualified.

He is not for sure. How many bankruptcies has that dope had ? At leart she possible would hire much better people with no business ties to Russia hopfully lol...

 

[tomdalton22]

He is not for sure. How many bankruptcies has that dope had ? At leart she possible would hire much better people with no business ties to Russia hopfully lol...

actually, Hillary is the one that has proven that she can't keep top secret information a secret. The Don just joked about it.

 

[biggunsbob]

actually, Hillary is the one that has proven that she can't keep top secret information a secret. The Don just joked about it.

Yeah just like all the other past officals in this double standard on who gets called out and investigated and who dosent under which congress but you know this do nothing obstructionist 114 th congress would rather investigate Clinton then do any real work. What A Waste Of TAXPAYERS Money trying to sink her in the first place, and now Drumpf is trying to get his buddy Putin to swing the election and not one of so called R''s have a problem with it



It was was waste of money to investigate Clinton it's not even funny and rooted jut in politics only by republicans.

http://www.politicususa.com/2016/07...estigating-hillary-clinton-investigation.html

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog...or_investigating_hillary_over_20_million.html


Benagzi tax waste counter

http://askedandanswered-democrats.benghazi.house.gov/cost/




Is this the Worst congress ever?
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/05/is-this-the-worst-congress-ever/483075/

 

[biggunsbob]

It's going to be so funny if the hack gets linked back to someone on the DT's team. I bet they are scrambling big time in that camp.

 

[Spartanmack]

He is not for sure. How many bankruptcies has that dope had ? At leart she possible would hire much better people with no business ties to Russia hopfully lol...

you do realize as Sec of State, influence peddler Clinton brokered/enabled a deal to sell all US uranium production to a Russian company in exchange for millions of dollars in donations to her foundation and rich speaking deals for her husband, right?

 

[Michchamp]

you do realize as Sec of State, influence peddler Clinton brokered/enabled a deal to sell all US uranium production to a Russian company in exchange for millions of dollars in donations to her foundation and rich speaking deals for her husband, right?

whoa... just when you think the argument is over, undercover CIA agent Spartanhack shows up to drop some insider knowledge and blow the whole thing up... damn.

 

[biggunsbob]

you do realize as Sec of State, influence peddler Clinton brokered/enabled a deal to sell all US uranium production to a Russian company in exchange for millions of dollars in donations to her foundation and rich speaking deals for her husband, right?

Since Reagan and maybe Nixon all of these presidents in there aministrations have basically been clones of each other. Whatever you say because we have Republican administrations that were 10 times worst the what Clinton did. But in the end I don't give a shit because they all a bunch of crap. Some are just a tad better on socal issue's and that's about it.

 

[Gulo Blue]

whoa... just when you think the argument is over, undercover CIA agent Spartanhack shows up to drop some insider knowledge and blow the whole thing up... damn.

Insider reports like the New York Times?

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/u...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

 

[Spartanmack]

Since Reagan and maybe Nixon all of these presidents in there aministrations have basically been clones of each other. Whatever you say because we have Republican administrations that were 10 times worst the what Clinton did. But in the end I don't give a shit because they all a bunch of crap. Some are just a tad better on socal issue's and that's about it.

you're as predictable as Bart Simpson in a game of rock, paper, scissors. There you go with the Republicans were worse non sequitur. You made the point that Trump was in bed with the Russians to point out how bad he is. I merely pointed out that your girl Hillary is just as slimy and as much or more in bed with them. Since you can't stay on topic and can't stand being shown the hypocrisy of your opinion you reply with your old stand by...like Bart Simpson "good ol' rock. Nothing beats rock!"

 

[Spartanmack]

whoa... just when you think the argument is over, undercover CIA agent Spartanhack shows up to drop some insider knowledge and blow the whole thing up... damn.

whoa, just when you think you're only arguing with one idiot, uber libtard michturd shows up to say something monumentally stupid.

 

[biggunsbob]

you're as predictable as Bart Simpson in a game of rock, paper, scissors. There you go with the Republicans were worse non sequitur. You made the point that Trump was in bed with the Russians to point out how bad he is. I merely pointed out that your girl Hillary is just as slimy and as much or more in bed with them. Since you can't stay on topic and can't stand being shown the hypocrisy of your opinion you reply with your old stand by...like Bart Simpson "good ol' rock. Nothing beats rock!"

Read it again . I asked the question but your to stupid . I never said he was I said is he,and I bet he is And let everyone take a shot at the articles I posted. You say the same crap over and over again. Whatever dude . BTW both champ and I have said how bad Clinton is but I guess you missed it. But she is way overqualified compared to Trump and you know it. So your lying when you say we have not blasted Clinton because we have.
All the Don has to do is show those tax returns and he clearsit all up.

 

[Spartanmack]

Read it again . I asked the question but your to stupid . I never said he was I said is he,and I bet he is And let everyone take a shot at the articles I posted. You say the same crap over and over again. Whatever dude . BTW both champ and I have said how bad Clinton is but I guess you missed it. But she is way overqualified compared to Trump and you know it. So your lying when you say we have not blasted Clinton because we have.
All the Don has to do is show those tax returns and he clearsit all up.

I don't see a question mark here where you say at least Clinton won't hire advisers with ties to the Russians, implying that Trump has ties to the Russians...

He is not for sure. How many bankruptcies has that dope had ? At leart she possible would hire much better people with no business ties to Russia hopfully lol...

I simply pointed out that she does ACTUALLY has business ties to Russia and you went off on another unhinged, off-topic rant about how previous administrations are all the same specifically mentioning 2 Republicans (and no Dems) who have been out of office for decades and dead for years. Now you're going off on another rant calling me stupid while making roughly 3 spelling and/or grammatical errors per sentence.

And please stop saying "and you know it" every time you reply - you're wrong virtually 100% of the time and I resent the implication that I'm anywhere near as dumb as you.

 

[biggunsbob]

I don't see a question mark here where you say at least Clinton won't hire advisers with ties to the Russians, implying that Trump has ties to the Russians...



I simply pointed out that she does ACTUALLY has business ties to Russia and you went off on another unhinged, off-topic rant about how previous administrations are all the same specifically mentioning 2 Republicans (and no Dems) who have been out of office for decades and dead for years. Now you're going off on another rant calling me stupid while making roughly 3 spelling and/or grammatical errors per sentence.

And please stop saying "and you know it" every time you reply - you're wrong virtually 100% of the time and I resent the implication that I'm anywhere near as dumb as you.

Wow keep up your elitists badgering work Hack.You should stop drinking I have never said I like Clinton only they she is more qualified then trump. It's a valid question about his tax returns. They both should show everything .Again read the words Skippy I said "if" and "I bet" Even you should understand that.

 

[Spartanmack]

Wow keep up your elitists badgering work Hack.You should stop drinking I have never said I like Clinton only they she is more qualified then trump. It's a valid question about his tax returns. They both should show everything .Again read the words Skippy I said "if" and "I bet" Even you should understand that.

I didn't say a word about he tax returns. I simply pointed out that Clinton has actual known ties to the Russians so you were incorrect about that. then, instead of saying something like "I didn't realize that, let me check it.out, thanks" in typical Bob fashion you took it personally and threw another tantrum because you're too consumed by hate - and you're not very bright.

 

[biggunsbob]

I didn't say a word about he tax returns. I simply pointed out that Clinton has actual known ties to the Russians so you were incorrect about that. then, instead of saying something like "I didn't realize that, let me check it.out, thanks" in typical Bob fashion you took it personally and threw another tantrum because you're too consumed by hate - and you're not very bright.

Again I asked the question with the thread and you flipped like you always do. Wow your something. For a guy who says he dosent like Trump you sure are defending him a lot on this board. A chance for the Republicans to win over democrats this cycle and they use hate and fear and nominate this guy . Talk about hate buddy look no further then the mirror and a candidate you seem to defend at every turn.

 

[Spartanmack]

Again I asked the question with the thread and you flipped like you always do. Wow your something. For a guy who says he dosent like Trump you sure are defending him a lot on this board. A chance for the Republicans to win over democrats this cycle and they use hate and fear and nominate this guy . Talk about hate buddy look no further then the mirror and a candidate you seem to defend at every turn.

flipped? I simply pointed out an error in your statement about Hillary - you're the one that lost his shit immediately after I pointed that out and went on an unrelated rant about how bad Nixon and Reagan were. And where have I defended Trump? I didn't say he didn't have ties to the Russians or defend them. I didn't say anything about his tax returns in his defense or otherwise. I challenge you to find one statement I've made on this thread in defense of Trump.

Give up Bob, you're in way over your head.