Rams vs 49ers

[biggunsbob]

This is a awful boring game . I am sure the Rams will figure a way to light us up by the time we play them but we should still beat them by 10+ points as they are a awful team.

 

[tomdalton22]

This was a very surprising result. I figured that the Rams wouldn't have had a passing attack, but for the 49ers to shut them out 28-0...WTF?

 

[tigermud]

The Rams appear to be a really bad football team, that game on the Lions schedule should be a win.

 

[Mitchrapp]

I didn't watch because I can't stand SF and hate LA. I hope they go 0-16.

 

[turok]

Back in '75, I met a guy @ work, who once had played for the "Cleveland" Rams, before the franchise moved to LA-StL-LA.

I don't know if there is any other pro-sports franchise that has moved more than twice, such as the NL Boston/Milwaukee/Atlanta Braves, the NFL Chicago/StL/Phoenix-Arizona Cardinals, the
NFL Oakland/LA/Oakland Raiders, and the AL Philadelphia/Kansas City/Oakland Athletics.

 

[inkfreq]

Back in '75, I met a guy @ work, who once had played for the "Cleveland" Rams, before the franchise moved to LA-StL-LA.

I don't know if there is any other pro-sports franchise that has moved more than twice, such as the NL Boston/Milwaukee/Atlanta Braves, the NFL Chicago/StL/Phoenix-Arizona Cardinals, the
NFL Oakland/LA/Oakland Raiders, and the AL Philadelphia/Kansas City/Oakland Athletics.

I don't know, without doing the math, the Sacramento Kings have to be close.

Cincinnati Royals -> Kansas City Kings -> Omaha Kings -> Sacramento Kings.

The Rams would be the Cleveland Rams -> LA Rams -> St. Louis Rams -> La Rams... so the same four cities, but two of them were the same.

Guess thats a tie.

 

[Mitchrapp]

Since we're talking about relocation shouldn't the Ravens be considered the Browns before them and the current Browns just have have a history since '98? Is that how it is or do the '98 and after Browns combine themselves with the '95 and before Browns?