Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

tOfficial 2013 Football Season Prediction Thread

I guess I'm one of the few that is not overly concerned with Iowa. We absolutely clown stomped them last year and it was only Devin's third start of his career. I just don't see how Iowa is that much better this year.

Doesn't matter if they're better or not. Until last year, they had our number. It's a road game. Especially since we have Sparty, Nebraska, and NW in a row before we play them. Not to mention the possibility of looking ahead to the Ohio game the very next week. Could be a division clincher for us. It screams trap game, despite the fact that we should destroy them.
 
I agree with Monster but think Iowa's talent gap now is pretty severe ....but tell that to 2004 Ohio* ....

I'm starting to think it's the Nerdcats ...in Evanston has spelled trouble for more an just Michigan.
 
Last edited:
I don't think even the most delusional Sparty would predict a 4th place finish with the offense they (don't) have.
 
I don't think even the most delusional Sparty would predict a 4th place finish with the offense they (don't) have.

according to his actual website... we finish 5th overall in the Big Ten, behind MSU, Northwestern, Nebraska, Wisconsin, and ohio, who he has playing Bama for the national title.

BCS berths to Nebraska, ND, ohio...

Wisconsin is a huge question mark. No idea whether their HC will work out. I don't get the sense it was a terrible hire though; he seems competent, having turned Utah State into a winner in a couple seasons. as far as I know he didn't have all the red flags in his past that RichRod had, no acrimonious departure, no lawsuits, etc.
 
gotta love the "experts" like Phil Steele. He writes this about Northwestern...
Last year the Wildcats were just 5 minutes and 3 seconds away from going unbeaten as they led in the fourth quarter of all 13 of their games. They still finished with 10 wins (most s/?95) and finally broke their long bowl drought (s/?48) with an impressive win over Mississippi St in the Gator Bowl. This year they return 15 starters including their top 2 quarterbacks, top 3 rushers and top 3 receivers. The schedule does get more difficult as each of the last two years they have avoided Ohio St and Wisconsin from the Leaders division but this year they draw both the Buckeyes and Badgers.
okay, so if they were able to squeak through a easy schedule, how can you possibly have them finishing above us when they have what could be two additional sure losses?
No. 17 Nebraska-The Huskers have been consistent under Bo Pelini as they have won at least 9 games each of his five seasons but have also lost four games each of those years as well. This year could be the year they finally break thru as they return 8 starters on offense including quarterback Taylor Martinez who returns for his 4th-year as the starter. The Achilles Heel for the Huskers last year was a defense that allowed 27.6 ppg and they return just 4 starters on that side of the ball this year. However, their schedule is manageable as they avoid Ohio St and Wisconsin from the Leaders division and also play their first five games at home.
...but their defense will suck again, and Martinez hasn't exactly been able to carry that team. if they are consistent, they'll drop 3-4 games, and if none of those are OOC, that means they'll finish with 3-4 conference losses.

AND... MSU isn't even in his top 26.

compare that to our report...
No. 19 Michigan-Coming off an 11-win season highlighted by a Sugar Bowl win in Brady Hoke?s first year, expectations were high for the Wolverines in 2012 and while they disappointed to an 8-5 finish, they did lose 4 games to Top 10 teams (Alabama, Notre Dame, Ohio St and South Carolina) which all took place away from home. This year there is no Alabama on the schedule in non-conference play and they also get Notre Dame, Nebraska and Ohio St all at home. They do return 12 starters, which is their fewest since 2008, but Brady Hoke has done very well stockpiling the talent including bringing in my #5 Frosh class this year.
Like... we "disappointed" to an 8-5 finish, but 4 of the losses were to top 10 opponents, and 3 of those came down to the wire. and we don't play 2 of those opponents, and we get the other two at home. and while our team is young, our coach is bringing in much better talent than his predecessor did, and developing it better. and we have a good defense. and nobody in our division is better.

So what's the logical result of all that?

4th place in the division; 6th overall.

way to use that Supercomputer, Phil.
 
Doesn't matter if they're better or not. Until last year, they had our number. It's a road game. Especially since we have Sparty, Nebraska, and NW in a row before we play them. Not to mention the possibility of looking ahead to the Ohio game the very next week. Could be a division clincher for us. It screams trap game, despite the fact that we should destroy them.

They had our number during the Rich Rod years. Who didn't? Totally different ball game now.
 
They had our number during the Rich Rod years. Who didn't? Totally different ball game now.

under Ferentz, Iowa does tend to have solid years after disappointing ones, and regardless, they're certainly not going to be a doormat like Indiana or Minnesota.

at that point in the season, we could be 10-0 or 9-1 & looking ahead to ohio and the regular season finale.

@Iowa is a game i wouldn't mind escaping with a close win. not expecting to annihilate them.
 
under Ferentz, Iowa does tend to have solid years after disappointing ones, and regardless, they're certainly not going to be a doormat like Indiana or Minnesota.

at that point in the season, we could be 10-0 or 9-1 & looking ahead to ohio and the regular season finale.

@Iowa is a game i wouldn't mind escaping with a close win. not expecting to annihilate them.

I don't expect us to be up 42-10 at the end of the 3rd like last season, but I won't be surprised if we win by double digits. I think this game is a 10+ point win.
 
I don't expect us to be up 42-10 at the end of the 3rd like last season, but I won't be surprised if we win by double digits. I think this game is a 10+ point win.

well, I just hope nobody on the team thinks like you do.
 
I typically like Phil Steele's work but also know that much of his analysis is done in February and March and typically ignores developments over the spring.

You also have to laugh at the "reasoning" applied to Nebraska -- maybe he's just one of the many "experts" who predicted NU to dominate the BigTen in year one and is still reaching for that...
 
I think we will go 10-2

What scares me this year is we are so young along the lines. We will be relying on RS freshman and although I believe they will be very good in time it worries me till they gain experience. I trust this staff. I fully believe we are on the right track. Last year was rough but Hoke has done wonders with what he inherited and the lack of depth.
 
that is true.

remembering from the bowl game how one missed communication on the line lead to Clowney's hit. and it was a more-or-less honest mistake that veterans made in that case!

there will be a lot of those moments this season. hopefully missed assignments don't come at the worst possible times, like that one did.
 
What people do forget because of that hit is that Lewan had handled Clowney one on one all game long. I do think our OL has more potential this year than last. I think the RS freshman could have easily played last year and were better than some of the guys that did play but Hoke thought it best for the long term of the team to RS all of them.
 
I like the promise of Jack Miller at center. This will be his third year in the program and he has strictly been a center since he stepped on campus. Last year, we dealt with a position switch in fall camp with Mealer moving over to center. Mealer was serviceable, but he wasn't as good as his beard.
 
What people do forget because of that hit is that Lewan had handled Clowney one on one all game long. I do think our OL has more potential this year than last. I think the RS freshman could have easily played last year and were better than some of the guys that did play but Hoke thought it best for the long term of the team to RS all of them.

Hey, the team used to go off-tackle, Henne hand-off to Hart, behind Long ....forty times a game!

Leverage Lewan against the weaker rush defenses out there and then use Gardner's athleticism on play actions and bootlegs to get him on the edge....
 
CMU - Win
Notre Dame - Win
Akron - Win
@ UConn - Win
Minnesota - Win
@ Penn State - loss
Indiana - Win
@ Michigan State - Win
Nebraska - Win
@ Northwestern - loss
@ Iowa - Win
Ohio - Win

10-2
 
I think Michigan goes into the ohio* game undefeated. Same for ohio*. The ohio game will be tough. Michigan will be defending its home game winning streak. Have to give the edge to Michigan since it is a home game. There better not be any more silly offensive calls like last year.

GO BLUE!
 
Last edited:
What people do forget because of that hit is that Lewan had handled Clowney one on one all game long. I do think our OL has more potential this year than last. I think the RS freshman could have easily played last year and were better than some of the guys that did play but Hoke thought it best for the long term of the team to RS all of them.

I think people also forget that Michigan came back after that and took the lead again. It came down to a long pass for the win, not that hit! Lewan handled Clowney the whole game and really that hit was pretty inconsequential in terms of the outcome of the game.
 
Back
Top