Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Week 10 Score Prediction Thread @ Indiana

Michchamp

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 4, 2011
Messages
34,212
Saturday, November 9, 2024 @ 3:30 PM ET in Bloomington, Indiana, unranked Michigan faces #8 Indiana on CBS.

Line: UM +14 o/u: 49.5
Sagarin Predictor: 12 pt IU win

Who would've thought we'd be at this point in the season and the standings would be what they are? 5-4 vs. 9-0 and Indiana is the undefeated team. SHIT. I guess this underscores how important good coaching is vs. talent; good coaching can overcome a lot, although to be fair, IU has played a pretty damn soft schedule so far (Sagarin ranks it 81st). They just keep winning easily though, so we STILL don't know how good they are, and maybe won't even after Saturday, since we're sandbagged by BAD coaching, and can't present much of a challenge to quality opponents. On 11/23 they visit Columbus, a week before we do and that may be their first real test against top competition.

FUCK. FUUUUUCK I HATE THIS!

For background on IU, see this thread from happier times (last year), our score prediction thread . This is now the 73rd all time meeting between the schools; UM holds a 62-10 all time record, and - other than the "Plague Season" in 2020, hadn't lost a game to IU going back to 1987, and was something like 27-1 against them over that span, 27-2 if you count 2020. For a long time, and through maybe September of this year, that looked to be the unchanging status quo.

how things have changed.

5516f3f269bedd3841343a7d

It's a fuckin' lovely war.

IU Football this season:

I posted a thread on Curt Cignetti, their (somewhat cocky coach), that also covered roster changes for them.

Their best win so far this season is either 5-4 Washington or 5-4 Nebraska, both in Bloomington; every other opponent is either a mid major, or has a losing record. Their 47-10 pasting of MSU in East Lansing was pretty impressive, easily their best road win, but MSU had just lost their Super Bowl in Ann Arbor the week before (and behaved like hysterical women again), so maybe they weren't "at their best" during that "time of the month" for them...

IU played nobody notable OOC. They truly have played a soft schedule, and - if we had competent coaching - I could be excited for this one as delivering a potential WAKE UP call to IU. But we don't have competent coaching.

STATS WATCH!
..................................................UM...................IU.
Total D..................47th (345ypg).......3rd (261ypg)
PED.........................................61st.............20th
Rush D.......................23rd (109ypg)....1st (72 ypg)
Total O....................... 127th (299ypg)..8th (476ypg)
PEO....................................... 121st...............3rd
Rush O................... 62nd (165ypg)......30th (191ypg)
Turnovers..................... 102nd (-.56).....10th (+1.1)
Penalties .......................10th (4.4/g).....24th (4.8/g)

:sick: Ugly.

Ah well. Soldier on... after this, we get a bye week to get healthy before our last easy opponent of the season (Northwestern) and then the ominous drive south to Columbus to potentially end the season.

So go ahead and make your picks, and post some analysis if you so choose, but as always, leave the woofing and barking for other threads!
 
Indiana always plays Michigan tough. Even when they are not having a great year. Hope for the best.

Michigan 27
IU 21
 
I hate to pick a UM loss, but...

UM...13
IU......24
 
Doesn't the prediction closest to the spread win? Final score was 20-15, which is a spread of 5pts. I predicted a spread of 6 points.
 
Doesn't the prediction closest to the spread win? Final score was 20-15, which is a spread of 5pts. I predicted a spread of 6 points.
You have to get the winning team right first, then spread, then total points.

I thought we had this debate a couple seasons ago, when someone picked a blowout loss, but we won a close game, and they claimed their pick should've won.

Their rationale was that even though they had picked the other team to win, we played badly and deserved to be blown out. Everyone else agreed that you had to pick the winning team first and foremost.
 
You have to get the winning team right first, then spread, then total points.

I thought we had this debate a couple seasons ago, when someone picked a blowout loss, but we won a close game, and they claimed their pick should've won.

Their rationale was that even though they had picked the other team to win, we played badly and deserved to be blown out. Everyone else agreed that you had to pick the winning team first and foremost.
Okay. I am not a rule maker here so I will accept what the rulemakers say.
 
20-15 = 5. I meant the actual spread in terms of the score. Thanks for your contribution.
That's some pretty impressive math, did you learn that at uofm? If that's what you meant, you're pretty clueless as to how spreads work and your contributions are pretty useless, unless they're meant to make people dumber. You had uofm winning by 6, they lost by 5. You were off by 11, not 1. My 5th grader understands this, but somehow it has you confused.
 
That's some pretty impressive math, did you learn that at uofm? If that's what you meant, you're pretty clueless as to how spreads work and your contributions are pretty useless, unless they're meant to make people dumber. You had uofm winning by 6, they lost by 5. You were off by 11, not 1. My 5th grader understands this, but somehow it has you confused.
I don't know why you feel the need to come to this board and be an asshole.
 
I don't know why you feel the need to come to this board and be an asshole.
I don't feel the need. I explained that you were off by 11 not 1 (mistakenly said 5 originally but the way you were looking at it, it was 1) and you responded like an asshole, so I responded in kind.
 
Back
Top