Yes. Since Stafford has a proven worse run game, worse drops and worse short fields since 2011. So all of them had better. Every.single.QB.
I saw a video today and they said Pittsburgh has more drops than any team this season.
By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!
Get StartedYes. Since Stafford has a proven worse run game, worse drops and worse short fields since 2011. So all of them had better. Every.single.QB.
Stafford is much much better than his career rating. His play is a 100+ rating QB. Many things have dragged that down
QB rating is a team stat for a lot of it. A good QB can be dragged down. A bad QB can also look better than he is aka Dak Prescott. Stafford is a good QB with mediocre ratings due to other factors. this can't be dispute
Every time Stafford gets a whiff of short fields or less drops or healthy weapons, he has a great QB rating
I saw a video today and they said Pittsburgh has more drops than any team this season.
I saw a video today and they said Pittsburgh has more drops than any team this season.
Every time Stafford gets a whiff of short fields or less drops or healthy weapons, he has a great QB rating
So he needs Megatron, Herman Moore, Barry Sanders, Antonia Gates, The Dallas OL and the Steelers 1976 defense?
So he needs Megatron, Herman Moore, Barry Sanders, Antonia Gates, The Dallas OL and the Steelers 1976 defense?
To put up a consistent 100 rating yes, but then it would define how great Stafford is. You know that ?team stat? would certainly be used to justify an individual?s performance in that scenario.
So Stafford would play to a 110 rating if he didn't have a shitty team around him.
:tup:
So Stafford would play to a 110 rating if he didn't have a shitty team around him.
:tup:
Need to create a fictional player known as ?ideal Stafford? (or simply iStafford), who never deals with injuries and everyone around him plays to their potential. Then we can figure out who?s actually being discussed: iStafford, the greatest QB in the league right now or Stafford, the above average QB who just can?t catch a break
Maybe we can make a sitcom out of it
Most YAC in the league benefits Stafford stats.
We are 7th best in average starting field position this year..benefits the Offense
Our defense and special teams have scored more than any other team..benefits offense numbers
Our Defense is top 10 in turnovers caused.
Our Offense is bottom 10 (bad) in turnovers
Offense is 18th in average yards per drive (below average)
Sad thing is without our crappy defense and special teams we are probably sitting here at 3-9 right now, they carried us earlier in the season.
Vikings lost their top 2 QBs, and their #1 RB, they haven't had their starting DT for two years now. Teams deal with injuries.
Stafford has a good rating this year would be great. Great if not for Oline protection and run game problems.
Talking career rating which is why is numbers are only upper 80s. Drops, weapon injuries, Stafford injuries, Oline, run game problems and lack of short fields most years.
Keenum is better than the other two QBs for Minnesota. They got lucky having those QB injuries. Vikings have a very healthy D which carries them.
Imagine the Vikings with Griffen with Ansahs injuries, no Linval Joseph and no Hunter. They would be terrible on D with no pass rush
What is your explanation for one playoff win since 1957? Adding up to DECADES of futility? And no apparent difference after Martha fired have the management and hired new?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
My one DSF wish is to see how LKP defended Joey Harrington back in the day. I bet, if he was old enough to have internet privileges, that it was glorious.
Founded in 2011, Detroit Sports Forum is a community of fanatics dedicated to teams like the Lions, Tigers, Pistons, Red Wings, Wolverines, and more. We live and breathe Detroit sports!