Who Advises Mittens ?

[byco42]

well... there you have it through such impeccable reasoning: no new regulations needed!

the next psycho that wants to own a 100 shot magazine for his AR-15, buy 6,000 rounds of ammunition so he can shoot up your local movie theatre, or farmer's market, or bowling alley, or high school... GO RIGHT FUCKING AHEAD... Mitt Romney, and Byco are A-OK with it.

everyone should own guns. period. and restricting a type of gun or component of gun = restricting all gun ownership, so no regulations should be allowed.

Keep making those straw men until you are out of straw. Your supply is dwindling. And let's make the rule for the whacko exception who will not abide by it anyway. Let's go all the way. Outlaw guns altogether. Remove them from everyone's possession. Shut down the gun manufacturers. You still will not stop acts like these from happening. And so whatever intermediate measures and restrictions you take will not work either. Not background checks, waiting periods, selective weapons bans.

You clearly do not understand that the psychopath who can perform such evil IS EVIL AND ALREADY THINKS THAT THE LAW DOES NOT APPLY TO HIM.

 

[byco42]

ROMNEY: Well this person shouldn?t have had any kind of weapons and bombs and other devices and it was illegal for him to have many of those things already. But he had them. And so we can sometimes hope that just changing the law will make all bad things go away. It won?t. Changing the heart of the American people may well be what?s essential, to improve the lots of the American people.


Romney also admitted he was unaware about pretty much most of the situation in Colorado. My 14 year old watched CNN for about an hour and was pretty much fully updated....lol
​

That person should not have had weapons, bombs and other devices. Do you agree or not?
It was illegal for him to have many of those things already. Still agree?

Are we done here? Or are you still not clear about the meaning of these statements?

 

[Thumb]

That person should not have had any kind of weapons, bombs and other devices. Do you agree or not?
It was illegal for him to have many of those things already. Still agree?

Are we done here? Or are you still not clear about the meaning of these statements?

FTFY since you rephrased it.

 

[elrod817]

You're either being obtuse or naive.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nG4NYnQ4Q_M

 

[byco42]

FTFY since you rephrased it.

Thanks. Actually strengths the argument. Appreciated. Obliged.

 

[Thumb]

Thanks. Actually strengths the argument. Appreciated. Obliged.

So you realize then that Romney is saying this guy should not have even had firearms that were legally obtained?

 

[byco42]

So you realize then that Romney is saying this guy should not have even had firearms that were legally obtained?

Yes, I realize that. Is he wrong on that point? A guy like that should not have weapons. Do you agree with him? I do.

The larger point is that a guy like that is going to find a way to get them anyway legally or illegally. Do you agree or not?

 

[Slick]

That person should not have had weapons, bombs and other devices. Do you agree or not?
It was illegal for him to have many of those things already. Still agree?

Are we done here? Or are you still not clear about the meaning of these statements?

what was it illegal for him to have ?

was it illegal to make the bombs....most certainly

but everything was obtained legally....and like Mitt said himself , he was UNAWARE of most things that were happening in Colorado.

as the Republican nominee for POTUS . me thinks he should have been AWARE....if not don't open your mouth until you are. :tup:

 

[cheeno]

Yes, I realize that. Is he wrong on that point? A guy like that should not have weapons. Do you agree with him? I do.

The larger point is that a guy like that is going to find a way to get them anyway legally or illegally. Do you agree or not?

Byco do you think drugs should be legalized?

 

[Mitchrapp]

what was it illegal for him to have ?

was it illegal to make the bombs....most certainly

but everything was obtained legally....and like Mitt said himself , he was UNAWARE of most things that were happening in Colorado.

as the Republican nominee for POTUS . me thinks he should have been AWARE....if not don't open your mouth until you are. :tup:

Place.Foot.In.Mouth. Isn't that the motto for every nominee for POTUS or POTUS himself. That's been going on since Washington.

 

[Slick]

Place.Foot.In.Mouth. Isn't that the motto for every nominee for POTUS or POTUS himself. That's been going on since Washington.

the largest mass shooting on American soil....c'mon Mitch the guys running for President and he say's he was unaware of pretty much the whole thing...but yethis people trot him out to give an assinine comment like he gave.

 

[Thumb]

Yes, I realize that. Is he wrong on that point? A guy like that should not have weapons. Do you agree with him? I do.

The larger point is that a guy like that is going to find a way to get them anyway legally or illegally. Do you agree or not?

Yeah, you;re agreeing only because you know the aftermath.

Take a different guy with the same background [no criminal history, no prior history of mental illness], buying all the same things, and not shooting anyone....I'll bet you Mitt won't say he shouldn't have had those weapons.

The fact is Mitt, or you, have no grounds under what the law currently is, to say he should not have those weapons, except after the fact.....and that's already too late.

 

[Mitchrapp]

the largest mass shooting on American soil....c'mon Mitch the guys running for President and he say's he was unaware of pretty much the whole thing...but yethis people trot him out to give an assinine comment like he gave.

Granted its not his finest moment.

 

[byco42]

what was it illegal for him to have ?

was it illegal to make the bombs....most certainly

but everything was obtained legally....and like Mitt said himself , he was UNAWARE of most things that were happening in Colorado.

as the Republican nominee for POTUS . me thinks he should have been AWARE....if not don't open your mouth until you are. :tup:

Well this person shouldn?t have had any kind of weapons and bombs and other devices...

He had bombs in his apartment. This is not complicated. To anyone who can read plain English.

 

[byco42]

Byco do you think drugs should be legalized?

No. But I do I think that it should be left to the states to determine its own drug laws.

 

[Slick]

No. But I do I think that it should be left to the states to determine its own drug laws.

so if Ohio legalized coke you'd be cool with it ?

 

[byco42]

Yeah, you;re agreeing only because you know the aftermath.

Take a different guy with the same background [no criminal history, no prior history of mental illness], buying all the same things, and not shooting anyone....I'll bet you Mitt won't say he shouldn't have had those weapons.

The fact is Mitt, or you, have no grounds under what the law currently is, to say he should not have those weapons, except after the fact.....and that's already too late.

What point are you making now? The statement was that he "shouldn't have had" is past perfect tense, because we didn't know he was going to ventilate a movie theatre. If you think that no one should have those weapons, fine, but you will not prevent guys like that from getting them.

 

[Mitchrapp]

No. But I do I think that it should be left to the states to determine its own drug laws.

You sure you're a conservative?

 

[Mitchrapp]

so if Ohio legalized coke you'd be cool with it ?

As long it's not the new Coke.

 

[Michchamp]

Keep making those straw men until you are out of straw. Your supply is dwindling. And let's make the rule for the whacko exception who will not abide by it anyway. Let's go all the way. Outlaw guns altogether. Remove them from everyone's possession. Shut down the gun manufacturers. You still will not stop acts like these from happening. And so whatever intermediate measures and restrictions you take will not work either. Not background checks, waiting periods, selective weapons bans.

You clearly do not understand that the psychopath who can perform such evil IS EVIL AND ALREADY THINKS THAT THE LAW DOES NOT APPLY TO HIM.

how is that a straw man? you (and Mitt) are okay with insane people legally buying high capacity magazines and assault rifles, enabling them to commit mass shootings that would otherwise be limited to the amount of ammunition they could load.