- Joined
- Aug 2, 2011
- Messages
- 35,778
I am far from an expert in Royalty, and agree the institution should be sacked; however, I do not believe the British Royals are devoid of power as implied.
The Brits did not officially enter WWII until the King's Speech. I am unsure if equivalent was required for Falklands or Afghanistan/Iraq/etc.
They also represent the British people in numerous ways, from foreign relations to philanthropy.
None of that is to say they are necessary as every thing they do can, and arguably should, be done by either the Parliament or businesses/individuals. Just saying I believe they still hold some forms of power and influence, unfortunately.
It was a pretty good movie. MichChamp actually started a thread about it on whatever board we were on over ten years ago when it came out.
George VI did make a symbolic speech supporting Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain?s official declaration of war on September 3, 1939.
The king?s speech didn?t matter anywhere near as much as the movie made it seem; as far as it being a binding authoritative declaration of policy, it didn?t matter at all.
The movie wasn?t about the speech; it was about George?s personal growth and transformation, and shit like that.
Colin Firth won the Oscar and Geoffrey Rush did too.
Good movie.