Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

10 Most corrupt States

biggunsbob

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Messages
95,934
New research takes a look at decades of corruption convictions to find the crookedest states in the union.

When we think of government corruption (as one tends to do), our biased minds often gravitate to thoughts of military juntas and third world governments. But, of course, corruption is everywhere, in one form or another. And it?s costing U.S. citizens big time.

A new study from researchers at the University of Hong Kong and Indiana University estimates that corruption on the state level is costing Americans in the 10 most corrupt states an average of $1,308 per year, or 5.2% of those states? average expenditures per year.

The researchers studied more than 25,000 convictions of public officials for violation of federal corruption laws between 1976 and 2008 as well as patterns in state spending to develop a corruption index that estimates the most and least corrupt states in the union. Based on this method, the the most corrupt states are:

1. Mississippi.....( Voted Republican).
2. Louisiana......( Voted Republican).
3. Tennessee....( Voted Republican).
4. Illinois...........(Voted Democrat).
5. Pennsylvania..(Voted Democrat).
6. Alabama........(Voted Republican).
7. Alaska...........Voted Republican).
8. South Dakota..(Voted Republican).
9. Kentucky........(Voted Republican).
10. Florida..........(Voted Democrat).

That these places landed on the list isn?t exactly surprising. Illinois, which has gain notoriety for its high-profile corruption cases in recent years, is paired with states like Mississippi and Louisiana, which are some of the least economically developed in the country. The researchers also found that for 9 out of the 10 of the most corrupt states, overall state spending was higher than in less corrupt states (South Dakota was the only exception). Attacking corruption, the researchers argue, could be a good way to bring down state spending without hurting services that people need.

Researchers also found that spending in these states was different than their less corrupt counterparts. According to the report, ?states with higher levels of corruption are likely to favor construction, salaries, borrowing, correction, and police protection at the expense of social sectors such as education, health and hospitals.?

The paper explains that construction spending, especially on big infrastructure projects, is particularly susceptible to corruption because the quality of large, nonstandard projects are difficult for the public to gauge, while the industry is dominated by a few monopolistic firms. Corrupt states also tend to, for obvious reasons, simply have more and better paid public servants, including police and correctional officers. The researchers argue that the need for correctional officers is greater in corrupt places too because ?the overall extent of corruption will be higher in states with higher numbers of convictions of public officials.?

Of course, it?s not all bad news, as the study also found the least corrupt states too. Citizens of these states?Oregon, Washington, Minnesota, Nebraska, Iowa, Vermont, Utah, New Hampshire, Colorado, and Kansas?can take solace in the fact that they?re not getting ripped off as badly as the rest of us.
 
Corruption is everywhere. I'd say California should be on that list, too.
 
WTF, how are NJ and NY not in the top 10, especially since this data went back to the 70s.

Oh, wait...now I get it, I see how they didn't make the list. The study only looked at CONVICTIONS. NY and NJ are too corrupt to actually get convicted because they have the judicial side equally involved in the corruption, and therefore even if they go to court the chances of a conviction are small.

No place is as corrupt as NYC...trust me. Every single judge is on the take, which is why the FBI doesn't touch NYC, because one will rat out the others and the entire system will collapse because there will not be a single judge available to hear even the most simple lawsuit. And that's just the snowflake on top of the NY corruption iceberg.

Pretty sure if I was given a Japanese Yen for every corrupt US Dollar that was transacted in NYC in a year, I'd be able to pay off the national debt, give everyone in the country a million dollars like it was monopoly money, and have enough money left over to be called the richest man alive.
 
Now, rather than look at the State voting record, look at where the states' economies rank nationally and cross-reference those findings with the list of the Top 10 Least Corrupt and I think you'd see a high-correlation between corruption and economic failure.

So while NY and NJ have a history of "corruption," maybe it's not enough actual corruption to out-weigh the massive amount of business being conducted that isn't corrupt..?

Same theory with Cali.

Mississippi fucking embezzled and stole money from it's own public school systems and Louisiana is probably the state most known for corruption through time.

.... And then there is the reality that Corruption is everywhere and at every level. For every Insurance adjuster willing to look the other way for a couple hundred bucks there is a Senator willing to Vote the other way for a couple million.
 
Last edited:
How is Florida not #1?

I don't know. The methodology is suspect... a state could be more corrupt than a post-Soviet Russian province, but wouldn't make the list if they didn't prosecute former officials.
 
Maybe the more corrupt states paid to have their ranking lowered????
 
the OP doesnt realize those southern states listed were controlled by mostly dems during the studied period
 
the OP doesnt realize those southern states listed were controlled by mostly dems during the studied period

That's a good point but others will overlook that fact and come up with an excuse or blame it on Bush somehow..
 
Yep, they corrupted themselves so badly that they became an uneducated and impoverished Republican voting base.
 
this article delves into the factors that lead to corruption a bit more:
One analysis comes from researchers at Indiana University and University of Hong Kong. They compared data from 25,000 convictions in public corruption cases with state spending data. As Governing magazine reports, the researchers document that the most corrupt states like Tennessee ?tended to spend money on construction, highways, and police protection programs, which provide more opportunity for corrupt officials to use public money for their own gain.? Governing adds that those ?states spend less on health, education, and welfare, which provide less opportunity for officials to collect bribes.?
 
Back
Top