Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

2024 Election

Admonishing sinners is one of the seven Spiritual Works on Mercy. It's rooted in love for neighbor, to help them avoid the occasion of sin.

To stand mute in this instance is not an act of love; it's the exact opposite.

Instructing the Ignorant is another Spiritual Work of Mercy.
 
Last edited:
Admonishing sinners is one of the seven Spiritual Works on Mercy. It's rooted in love for neighbor, to help them avoid the occasion of sin.

To stand mute in this instance is not an act of love; it's the exact opposite.

Instructing the Ignorant is another Spiritual Works of Mercy.

I suggest you take a look at the nice list I posted in the religion section. Goes a long way in showing just how crazy you people have to be.
 
2 years ahead of time. I agree with Sam Zell. Best thing for our country would be if Trump and Biden don't run in 2024.

So which globalist swamp rat Republican who takes money from all sides is your favorite?
 
An example of the ?bravest people? Joe Biden knows (his words) on the White House lawn - braver than the men who stormed the beaches at Normandy. Braver than the men and women who rushed into the World Trade Center on Sempter 11, 2001. The bravest, period.

And if you don?t agree they're the bravest and celebrate it or you think maybe this doesn't belong on the White House lawn, you?re a hateful bigot. Don?t forget to make sure your kids see this (in case you didn?t bring them to the event) so they know what real bravery looks like?

Here you go.........

"This behavior is inappropriate and disrespectful for any event at the White House. It is not reflective of the event we hosted to celebrate LGBTQI+ families or the other hundreds of guests who were in attendance. Individuals in the video will not be invited to future events"

You can settle down now. :tup:
 
Here you go.........

"This behavior is inappropriate and disrespectful for any event at the White House. It is not reflective of the event we hosted to celebrate LGBTQI+ families or the other hundreds of guests who were in attendance. Individuals in the video will not be invited to future events"

You can settle down now. :tup:

LOLOL. Settle down? Im perfectly calm. You?re the one who has his hair on fire for anyone who pushed back against this radical agenda. A second ago you were defending the behavior and ridiculing people who called it out. Now that your thought overlords have told you what to think, you?ve changed your tune.

Still, something about this response and this post reminds me of the poem ?Casey at the Bat? for some reason?
 
Last edited:
LOLOL. Settle down? Im perfectly calm. You?re the one who has his hair on fire for anyone who pushed back against this radical agenda. A second ago you were defending the behavior and ridiculing people who called it out. Now that your thought overlords have told you what to think, you?ve changed your time.

Still, something about this response and this post reminds me of the poem ?Casey at the Bat? for some reason?

Really messed up that you think that trans people existing is a "radical agenda". :no:
 
Really messed up that you think that trans people existing is a "radical agenda". :no:

Now where did those goal posts go? Nice try, but you don't have the moral high ground here. You know this isn't about whether or not trans people exist.
 
Last edited:
Now where did those goal posts go? Nice try, but you don't have the moral high ground here. You know this isn't about whether or not trans people exist.

All I know is that you have a weird fixation with trans people. Maybe spend more time worrying about the kid fuckers in the church.
 
All I know is that you have a weird fixation with trans people. Maybe spend more time worrying about the kid fuckers in the church.

Aren't you the one defending grown men in dresses desperate to "read books" to other people's children or have kids slip money in their underwear as they perform sexually provocative dance routines for them at their "family friendly" shows? Yeah, that's you. Keep spreading the love man!

And just to be clear, you're the one who made the loving and compassionate defense of the radical agenda being pushed by your dementia addled hero. I merely responded to it.
 
Last edited:
Aren't you the one defending grown men in dresses desperate to "read books" to other people's children

Pretty sure those kids have parents and that those parents get to decide whether or not their kids go to a story hour.

That's how twisted your mind is, you think it's your job to decide what other people can and can't do.

As for the rest of your claims, not once have I came out in support of kids being around performances that include suggestive sexual conduct.
 
Pretty sure those kids have parents and that those parents get to decide whether or not their kids go to a story hour.

yeah, those kids have parents. Funny thing about parents though - anyone can be one so their judgement isn't infallible or unquestionable. That's a cop out, not a legitimate argument for not pushing back against the sexualization of kids.

But that's not the point, really. While I would question the judgement of the parents, what concerns me way more (which I've already made quite clear) is the motivation behind the men who want to put on dresses and read to other people's kids. And it's equally disconcerting that there are adults that run these functions that not only don't question the motivation but celebrate it.

That's how twisted your mind is, you think it's your job to decide what other people can and can't do.

I'm not deciding what people can and can't do - although I think there is a point where someone who isn't out of their mind needs to step up and say enough is enough. I have every right to criticize bad policy, evil agendas and mistreatment of kids where I see it. What I'm doing is trying to get you to think about what's actually going on. I know, I know, thinking isn't your strong suit and you prefer to abdicate that responsibility to the puppeteers propping up your dementia addled hero but that doesn't mean I can't or shouldn't call it what it is.

As for the rest of your claims, not once have I came out in support of kids being around performances that include suggestive sexual conduct.

Yes you have, you just hide behind the excuse of "their parents are ok with it, so it's no one else's business" or the lie that conservatives are trying to ban books when they're trying to get books containing pornography out of elementary and middle school libraries. If you're doing that, and you are doing that, you're advocating for it. Ignorance is no excuse.
 
Last edited:
Objecting to something and refusing to comply with the Zeitgeist is not the same thing as "dictating". Seems to me that all the "dictation" is originating from the global cadre and the lemmings who are following it off the cliff. I'll simply not fall in line.

"YOU MUST ACCEPT ME AND MY BELIEFS" is not persuasion. It's coercion. There are two genders. There is no such thing as transgender; it is a myth; a lie too often repeated.
 
So which globalist swamp rat Republican who takes money from all sides is your favorite?


DeSantis, I could potentially get behind RFK Jr yet though to. Buck doesn't want to have any debates
 
Back
Top