Slick
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2012
- Messages
- 1,461
Whatever you guys say... I have said plenty of times that Dallas as an entire team had a bad game in a win..
that one last year...that's all on Romo :tup:
By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!
Get StartedWhatever you guys say... I have said plenty of times that Dallas as an entire team had a bad game in a win..
based on what you stated here, Stafford would have had a good game, but apparently the defense did not.
the defense was key to beating the rams and they had a good game. it is possible for multiple aspects of the team to have good games while a different one has a terrible game and deserves the blame for the loss.
but...see...here's the thing...the lions WON. and they won because the D played very well and Stafford had a good day overcoming a bad start but WINNING the game in the end.
it isn't being ridiculous when you are applying proper analysis to a situation. bad 1st half, yes...but that does not equate to a bad game in its entirety. why is that so hard to comprehend?
"It wasn't like he was just having a bad day," Schwartz said. "He had a couple of bad plays.
"You have to have a demeanor that allows you to come back from that."
If a guy goes 34-39 n throws 5 ints he had a bad game. Sure it was only 5 plays out of the entire game but they're turnovers..
Also Stafford could have had 3 more picks had STL caught the ball. He was accurate all day but was making bad decisions.
If a guy goes 34-39 n throws 5 ints he had a bad game. Sure it was only 5 plays out of the entire game but they're turnovers..
Also Stafford could have had 3 more picks had STL caught the ball. He was accurate all day but was making bad decisions.
At least every pass he threw got caught! Pretty impressive!
If a guy goes 34-39 n throws 5 ints he had a bad game. Sure it was only 5 plays out of the entire game but they're turnovers..
Also Stafford could have had 3 more picks had STL caught the ball. He was accurate all day but was making bad decisions.
So if Stafford goes 21-21 for 325 yards and 3 tds but they lose by 21 is it a bad game for him?
What about if he goes 20-21 with 3 tds but his incompletion was a goal line pick to end the game and they lose...is that a bad game?
Its very possible to have good games with a loss and bad games with a win..you guys are ridiculous.
I don't care how you try to spin it....Stafford did NOT have a good game. The Lions will lose most of their games if he throws 3 INTs a game.
And you need to shut the fuck up about it. It's Wednesday....
fuck off
Lets see if I get this right. Detroit will lose most of their games if Staff throws 3 INT? Nooooooooo.
:lmao:
And in what year did Staff throw 3+ INTs in every game? Really grasping for straws using that as the basis for one's argument, IMO. I'd say he has a better chance at throwing for 350+ yards per game than throwing 3+ INTs in every game. Come on 6000 yard season, woohooo!!!! (and yes, i know 350 averages to less than the 6000 yard mark...but pay attention to the + sign after it so i don't have to point it out later, thank you in advance).
Stafford has 6 games with 3+ INTS and the Lions are 1-5 in those games. That FACT supports my argument.
3 of which came as a rookie , when they went 2 - 14 and were horrid.
He only had 2 games last year in which he threw 3 or more , you post like he did it 5 or 6 times last season.
He's not going to throw 3 or more picks in 80% of the games he plays....1 or 2 probably but they're good enough on defense now and have the offense to now score and overcome those mistakes.
Founded in 2011, Detroit Sports Forum is a community of fanatics dedicated to teams like the Lions, Tigers, Pistons, Red Wings, Wolverines, and more. We live and breathe Detroit sports!