- Thread Author
- #1
tycobb420
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2011
- Messages
- 2,782
How's this for a right field argument? Which would you take if you could only have one?
By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!
Get StartedKaline. Were I a Pirates' fan, I'd pick Clemente and be right.
Kaline all the way... But RC was a HOF to.... Can't go wrong with either..
Kaline, and it's not even close. I never saw either of them play, so it has nothing to do with where I am from. Kaline is a better player. Both were great fielders. Kaline had more power, got on base more, played longer, and he didn't strike out nearly as much. It would be hard for someone to make an unbiased argument for Clemente IMO.
Pretty hard to play longer when you die in a plane crash. That fact alone negates any insight you might have.
To be fair to Clemente, his last few years were better then Kalines last few, so the argument could be made that Clemente, though 38 at the time of his death, might have had 2-4 more seasons in him.
Kaline played 4 more seasons and 401 more games, and only had 7 more hits total than Clemente. But Kaline also could take a walk and didn't strike out a ton, Clemente rarely walked and struck out quite a bit.
You could probably make a solid argument for either of them and not be wrong.
How is that relevant at all. Do you want to tell me their road stats?
The reason why I mentioned it is because the only stat that Clemente really has the edge on Kaline is his batting average. Usually when a player sticks around for a few more years his dareerbatting average drops significantly. But, I am still waiting to see what Clemente did on the road in April from Rabbid. Im sure that he will find some off the wall stat to argue.
Founded in 2011, Detroit Sports Forum is a community of fanatics dedicated to teams like the Lions, Tigers, Pistons, Red Wings, Wolverines, and more. We live and breathe Detroit sports!