Coronainsanity

[Spartanmack]

I can't understand this, because I'm stupid.

Everyone knows that.

 

[tinselwolverine]

I can't understand this, because I'm stupid.

Everyone knows that.

OK I?m going to step in and ref here for a second.

It is customary to, when one edits a quote, insert a courtesy ?ftfy.?

 

[Spartanmack]

OK I?m going to step in and ref here for a second.

It is customary to, when one edits a quote, insert a courtesy ?ftfy.?

That's what it said originally (although I used fify not ftfy) then I edited it to what you quoted. Didn't think it was necessary - I have no doubt MC had to think about whether or not that's what he actually typed but I'm sure he figured it out after looking back at his original post.

 

[Spartanmack]

Huh, CEO of for profit Moderna splits w/ CDC, says if you're under 50 and healthy you don't necessarily need the COVID booster (if you're over 50 and healthy you probably also don't need it). Of course, this guy isn't a public health official, so what the f*** does he know, right?

 

[tigermud]

The New York Supreme Court on Tuesday ordered New York City to reinstate all employees that were fired over their vaccination status, calling the decision to terminate unvaccinated employees an ?arbitrary and capricious action.?

 

[tinselwolverine]

Huh, CEO of for profit Moderna splits w/ CDC, says if you're under 50 and healthy you don't necessarily need the COVID booster (if you're over 50 and healthy you probably also don't need it). Of course, this guy isn't a public health official, so what the f*** does he know, right?

I think he has Ph.D in Social Justice/Equity.

 

[tigermud]

Senator Rand Paul asserted Thursday that Anthony Fauci is directly responsible for funding dangerous research that likely killed millions of people, and that he ?won?t get away.?

?Likely there is no public health figure who has made a greater error in judgement than Dr Fauci,? Paul declared in a Fox News appearance, adding ?the error of judgement was to fund gain of function research in a totalitarian country.?

 

[tinselwolverine]

Senator Rand Paul asserted Thursday that Anthony Fauci is directly responsible for funding dangerous research that likely killed millions of people, and that he ?won?t get away.?

?Likely there is no public health figure who has made a greater error in judgement than Dr Fauci,? Paul declared in a Fox News appearance, adding ?the error of judgement was to fund gain of function research in a totalitarian country.?

You do know those two have been going back-and-forth about this for a couple of years or so, don?t you?

 

[Michchamp]

I've been reading for a while, articles here and there warning a wave of COVID related deaths or deaths due to the after effects of it was coming. Similar to the high death rates that persist among survivors of prior pandemics.

Heart attacks seem to be increasing, from what I'm reading, among younger people.

Of course, to a certain segment of the population, this HAS to be due to vaccines, and nothing you can tell them will convince them otherwise, even though damage to the heart and circulatory system b/c of COVID - even mild infections - is documented, and the other stuff is...entirely speculation.

 

[Michchamp]

Everyone knows that.

Person who takes six hours and dozens of edits just to type a barely-coherent post: "Your stpid for not unsderstandsing me."

 

[Spartanmack]

Person who takes six hours and dozens of edits just to type a barely-coherent post: "Your stpid for not unsderstandsing me."

"You're" stupid because of all the monumentally stupid crap you spew on these boards. You consistently and thoroughly make it clear to anyone who isn't stupid.

 

[Spartanmack]

I've been reading for a while, articles here and there warning a wave of COVID related deaths or deaths due to the after effects of it was coming. Similar to the high death rates that persist among survivors of prior pandemics.

Heart attacks seem to be increasing, from what I'm reading, among younger people.

Of course, to a certain segment of the population, this HAS to be due to vaccines, and nothing you can tell them will convince them otherwise, even though damage to the heart and circulatory system b/c of COVID - even mild infections - is documented, and the other stuff is...entirely speculation.

Heart attacks seem to be increasing among young people?!!! Thanks for the revelation. FYI, Kennedy was shot and we landed on the moon.

 

[byco42]

Research published in ACS Infectious Diseases shows mass vaccination against COVID-19 is backfiring as SARS-CoV-2 readily mutates and thrives in the vaccinated.

By Peter A. McCullough, M.D., MPH

LINK

Dr. Peter McCullough was "pariahed" by the medical industry for his opinions on COVID, the vaccines for several years now.

Before that, he was/is a world-renowned Cardiologist.

 

[Spartanmack]

Research published in ACS Infectious Diseases shows mass vaccination against COVID-19 is backfiring as SARS-CoV-2 readily mutates and thrives in the vaccinated.

By Peter A. McCullough, M.D., MPH

LINK

Dr. Peter McCullough was "pariahed" by the medical industry for his opinions on COVID, the vaccines for several years now.

Before that, he was/is a world-renowned Cardiologist.

We've been following McCullough, Dr. Robert Malone, Jay Bhattacharya at Stanford and another epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins whose name I can't recall at the moment, since the beginning of the pandemic. All of them have been pariahed, shadown banned, black listed and ultimately outright banned.

Malone was one of the scientists who developed and patented the MRNA technology and was world renowned until he started speaking out against the popular narrative. McCullough is probably my favorite - has a lot of great interview/talks and papers on the subject. Like the others, he sticks to the science and aggregates and presents information from multiple studies in a way that's easy to understand and follow.

Edit: Interestingly enough, both McCullough and Malone's bans were lifted today now that left wing fascists are no longer running Twitter. How's that for timing?

 

[byco42]

An FDA study has revealed that patients over 65 who have received the Pfizer vaccine have subsequently suffered ... here's the quote from the study:

"Four outcomes met the threshold for a statistical signal following BNT162b2 (Pfizer)
vaccination including pulmonary embolism (PE; RR = 1.54), acute myocardial infarction (AMI; RR = 1.42), disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC; RR = 1.91), and immune thrombocytopenia (ITP; RR = 1.44). After further evaluation, only the RR for PE still met the statistical threshold for a signal; however, the RRs for AMI, DIC, and ITP no longer did."

RR = relative risk.

"This early warning system is the first to identify temporal associations for PE, AMI, DIC, and ITP following BNT162b2 vaccination in the elderly. Because an early warning system does not prove that the vaccines cause these outcomes, more robust epidemiologic studies with adjustment for confounding, including age and nursing home residency, are underway to further evaluate these signals.

"FDA strongly believes the potential benefits of COVID-19 vaccination outweigh the potential risks of COVID-19 infection." For this age group, I expect is the inference.

Here's the thing. None of this testing was done prior to the release of the "vaccine", so these patients are essentially human guinea pigs. But "more robust" testing is "underway."

The cases for these > threshold statistical signal (for Pfizer):

AMI >13,000
PE > 9,000

Keep in mind that other "vaccines:" were evaluated as well and their cases were of similar value, but did not hit their assigned thresholds. There were 14 "historical outcomes" evaluated and the total number of cases that were detected numbers > 100,000 (est)

There's much more to breakdown in the study, this ready-fire-aim approach to COVID "vaccination" is one of many reasons why I will never receive it.

Oh, and this as well: "In the context of COVID-19 pandemic, a report on ivermectin suppression of SARS-CoV-2 viral replication in cell cultures has been published, and the use of this medication seems to be potentially useful for the therapy."

Source: FDA-Approved study by NIH: Link

So the cart is before the horse. We are learning that there is likely are "temporal associations" between "vaccines" and deadly side effects as well as treatment potential of COVID with Ivermectin. This (Ivermectin) study was completed in 2020.

 

[mhughes0021]

No one said anyone is still advocating for vaccine passports - that?s not the point for crap?s sake. That should be obvious even to you, but it?s not.



More mad up garbage- no one is demanding anyone pretend it doesn?t exist. It?s just something you pulled out of thin air to win an argument no one is having.



Revising history here I see. You team was demanding everyone get vaccinated not only for themselves but to protect the people around you. Look it up. Biden, Fauci, the CDC and half of Congress was saying this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated and they were putting the vaccinated at risk, that we had to get vaccinated to protect the people around us or be shut out from society. The revelation is that was nothing but lies to sell vaccines. The lie for profit is the big admission. Of course you have to misrepresent that point because you?re a big pharma billionaire bootlicker and public health official sycophant who doesn?t want to think for himself or admit that you were duped by these fraudsters because of your blind fealty to them.

For how much you use data.... higher vaccination %, less deaths... literally across the entire world. But youre too dumb to understand it.

 

[mhughes0021]

An FDA study has revealed that patients over 65 who have received the Pfizer vaccine have subsequently suffered ... here's the quote from the study:

"Four outcomes met the threshold for a statistical signal following BNT162b2 (Pfizer)
vaccination including pulmonary embolism (PE; RR = 1.54), acute myocardial infarction (AMI; RR = 1.42), disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC; RR = 1.91), and immune thrombocytopenia (ITP; RR = 1.44). After further evaluation, only the RR for PE still met the statistical threshold for a signal; however, the RRs for AMI, DIC, and ITP no longer did."

RR = relative risk.

"This early warning system is the first to identify temporal associations for PE, AMI, DIC, and ITP following BNT162b2 vaccination in the elderly. Because an early warning system does not prove that the vaccines cause these outcomes, more robust epidemiologic studies with adjustment for confounding, including age and nursing home residency, are underway to further evaluate these signals.

"FDA strongly believes the potential benefits of COVID-19 vaccination outweigh the potential risks of COVID-19 infection." For this age group, I expect is the inference.

Here's the thing. None of this testing was done prior to the release of the "vaccine", so these patients are essentially human guinea pigs. But "more robust" testing is "underway."

The cases for these > threshold statistical signal (for Pfizer):

AMI >13,000
PE > 9,000

Keep in mind that other "vaccines:" were evaluated as well and their cases were of similar value, but did not hit their assigned thresholds. There were 14 "historical outcomes" evaluated and the total number of cases that were detected numbers > 100,000 (est)

There's much more to breakdown in the study, this ready-fire-aim approach to COVID "vaccination" is one of many reasons why I will never receive it.

Oh, and this as well: "In the context of COVID-19 pandemic, a report on ivermectin suppression of SARS-CoV-2 viral replication in cell cultures has been published, and the use of this medication seems to be potentially useful for the therapy."

Source: FDA-Approved study by NIH: Link

So the cart is before the horse. We are learning that there is likely are "temporal associations" between "vaccines" and deadly side effects as well as treatment potential of COVID with Ivermectin. This (Ivermectin) study was completed in 2020.

What was the side effect of getting covid over the age of 65 when the virus first spread and we had no vaccines? The answer is ... you were fucking dead.

Old people having heart attacks... there's a fucking revelation if I ever heard one.

 

[byco42]

What was the side effect of getting covid over the age of 65 when the virus first spread and we had no vaccines? The answer is ... you were fucking dead.

Covid Deaths per 100,000 peak:

Age +75: 57 (Jan 2, 2021)
Age 65-74: 14 (Jan 2, 2021)

Source: CDC. Link

Old people having heart attacks... there's a fucking revelation if I ever heard one.

So not even the "official" sources that publish information that illustrates these MRNA "vaccines" have side effects up to and including death are convincing. Whatever. You have a right to live in a state of denial. I doubt you read a word of that study. #30

 

[tinselwolverine]

What was the side effect of getting covid over the age of 65 when the virus first spread and we had no vaccines? The answer is ... you were fucking dead.

Old people having heart attacks... there's a fucking revelation if I ever heard one.

What you just said is everyone over 65 who got Covid before there were vaccines died. That just isn?t true.

Maybe you were being hyperbolic.

Go Lions!

 

[Spartanmack]

For how much you use data.... higher vaccination %, less deaths... literally across the entire world. But youre too dumb to understand it.

Death rates for healthy people under 65 were already low. The vaccines may be helpful for the elderly and infirmed but totally unnecessary otherwise, particularly given the risks they present. And whether I?m vaccinated or not poses no threat to you. That?s been my position since the beginning. But you?re too dumb to understand that.