Maize&blue21 said:
I agree but Kershaw is 23 and is on line to win the NL cy young. Turner is just a prospect and i highly doubt he will ever be as good as kershaw
Cy Young or not, adding Kershaw does not greatly improve this team when you are trading the projected #4 and #5 starters, and the lone quality hitting prospect.
2011 Teams records when a pitcher starts
Verlander 25-9
Porcello 21-10
Scherzer 21-12
Penny 16-15
Fister 8-2
Kennedy 25-8
Halladay 24-8
Kershaw 23-10
C. Lee 22-10
Sabathia 22-11
J. Weaver 22-11
Greinke 21-7
C.J. Wilson 21-13
On an already good team, the actual difference between a great starter and a mediocre one is about 3-5 wins. Run Support often dictates the amount of wins a starter actually gets, or does not get.
In the last two years, Edwin Jackson's teams are 30-33 when he starts. DET is 34-30 is Scherzer's starts. The implication is that Scherzer is only about 2 wins per year better than Jackson. I could then make a strong argument that Granderson has been at least 5 wins better than Jackson over the last 2 years. Certainly, Schlereth has provided nothing, except maybe a negative. Cook is about neutral. The positive in this trade is DET got younger and "cheaper".
By acquiring Kershaw, DET would not be getting "cheaper". Kershaw is arbitraion eligible and is due for a huge raise.