Slick
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2012
- Messages
- 1,461
they could stay put and hope Evans falls into their lap also.
By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!
Get Startedthey could stay put and hope Evans falls into their lap also.
Would you take him over Gilbert?
you offer the Rams a 2nd and a 5th and a swap of 1sts , I think they jump at it in a heartbeat....2 first round picks and 2 early 2nd rounders can fix a lot of problems in St Louis.
no...lol
but I think MM wants to stop defences from doubling and tripling CJ.
no...lol
but I think MM wants to stop defences from doubling and tripling CJ.
The Rams were 7-9 last year in a much more difficult division. Unlike the Lions, they need a #1 WR, so if Watkins is there at 6 they will grab him. Then at 13 they can get a guy like Dennard. Or, maybe they get Clowney at 6 and take Evans at 13. Either way....I think the Rams are just as close to being a playoff caliber team as the Lions after this draft (they have 12 picks)
A running game will stop the triple team. CJ is almost going to always have one safety over there.
at #6 ??? theRams pick at #2 shooter...and need a OT more then anything...which they can get at #10
Bush ran for 1,000 yards in 14 games and Bell had 650....running game is already here.
The rams have every incentive to trade back because the things they need are available in surplus this year. There are 3 top 10 caliber OTs. At 13 there is plenty of Wrs and DB help that fit in that range. They have the opportunity to become a very good franchise with this draft but I still think they don't have the QB to lead them so that will be their hangup.
I think a 2nd and the 5th get it done along with the #10 of course.
and so is the passing game (Stafford 3rd in NFL in yards). So, I would say what the Lions need is defense!
I tend to agree with you but who do you draft to fix the defense. I think the Cbs were pretty dreadful last year but also don't think that scheme helped also they were ruined with injury.(again) Is Gilbert going to be elite....i dont see him as that type of player who is a pure shutdown guy. Dennard isn't either. Safety could be a good choice I like HA-ha for this team but is he worth a number 10 pick. I'm not sure. There is no elite DE outside of Clowney who has his own mental problems and will be gone way to early for us to consider him an option. Mayhew want's to go BPA so if he can trade up for one of the best guys in the draft in Watkins it seems he would aim for that. I don't like it because I think it actually weakens the draft. A team without a bunch of holes can do it but as the falcons proved 1 piece away doesn't mean anything when you get injuries or the team as a whole kind of falls apart. For the right price I am fond of the trade up but I also see options at 10 and 42 that make the team better.
I tend to agree with you but who do you draft to fix the defense. I think the Cbs were pretty dreadful last year but also don't think that scheme helped also they were ruined with injury.(again) Is Gilbert going to be elite....i dont see him as that type of player who is a pure shutdown guy. Dennard isn't either. Safety could be a good choice I like HA-ha for this team but is he worth a number 10 pick. I'm not sure. There is no elite DE outside of Clowney who has his own mental problems and will be gone way to early for us to consider him an option. Mayhew want's to go BPA so if he can trade up for one of the best guys in the draft in Watkins it seems he would aim for that. I don't like it because I think it actually weakens the draft. A team without a bunch of holes can do it but as the falcons proved 1 piece away doesn't mean anything when you get injuries or the team as a whole kind of falls apart. For the right price I am fond of the trade up but I also see options at 10 and 42 that make the team better.
He has put together a few nice games. Think he is pretty average usually has pedestrian type numbers. Not high ints which is nice but also low tds and middle of pack yards. Struggles behind a terrible oline and really lacks weapons. I have always thought he was a little overhyped. He has struggled with injuries and even in his complete seasons hasn't been over the top with his production. On the right team he could do enough to win and not hurt you. Not sure this rams team has that type of talent though.Bradford was having a nice year until the injury..I think he's good enough to win.
because at a 50/50 bust rate if you have two 1st round picks your odds say one will be a success. If you only have one your odds say that you have a 50% chance that he will be a bust.
He has put together a few nice games. Think he is pretty average usually has pedestrian type numbers. Not high ints which is nice but also low tds and middle of pack yards. Struggles behind a terrible oline and really lacks weapons. I have always thought he was a little overhyped. He has struggled with injuries and even in his complete seasons hasn't been over the top with his production. On the right team he could do enough to win and not hurt you. Not sure this rams team has that type of talent though.
Founded in 2011, Detroit Sports Forum is a community of fanatics dedicated to teams like the Lions, Tigers, Pistons, Red Wings, Wolverines, and more. We live and breathe Detroit sports!