Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Fox News Hannity exposed in court as Cohen client


Oh, hey, the League of Assassins, headed by Talia al Gul's father Ra's al Gul, would be another potential merger suitor.

This is stretching it a bit, but Telly Savalas, who had once or twice been Blofeld, was Oliver Reed's partner/nemesis in a pretty good/ not that well known 1969 film, The Assassination's Bureau.

So there's another option.
 
Not every deal has to be an industry rollup, consolidation or vertical integration. Luthor is extremely rich and seemingly pragmatic, like Bill Gates while Blofeld is a blood thirsty murderous sociopath, like Jeff Bezos. If Lex buys him out, he can retire rich - so long as he doesn't violate his non-compete clause. That has to be better than being put on a slowly retracting bridge over a large tank with a hungry tiger shark just waiting for you to drop in.

In the campy '60s series Batman, Batman and Robin frequently found themselves in similar situations that Bond's various nemeses put Bond into.
 
Oh, hey, the League of Assassins, headed by Talia al Gul's father Ra's al Gul, would be another potential merger suitor.

This is stretching it a bit, but Telly Savalas, who had once or twice been Blofeld, was Oliver Reed's partner/nemesis in a pretty good/ not that well known 1969 film, The Assassination's Bureau.

So there's another option.

a bidding war would be nice but I think you want to keep it private and still go with Luthor's best bid. If I was advising MC, I'd tell him to have his secretary screen Blofeld's calls or just send him straight to voicemail and never call him back - same with the Assassination's Bureau. I just don't trust either of those organizations and with good reason, I think.
 
If Luthor was so smart, he would have absorbed Wayne Enterprises into LexCorp through a hostile takeover when Bruce was missing and not in control.
 
a bidding war would be nice but I think you want to keep it private and still go with Luthor's best bid. If I was advising MC, I'd tell him to have his secretary screen Blofeld's calls or just send him straight to voicemail and never call him back - same with the Assassination's Bureau. I just don't trust either of those organizations and with good reason, I think.

You're talking about Telly, right?

He's the common denominator.

Not that well known snippet; surprisingly, early on, fans for some reason didn't take to Connery as Bond that much, and Broccoli almost replaced him with Oliver Reed, who at the time was Britain's biggest.

Ultimately, Reed's antics; drinking, brawling, et. al; made Broccoli stay with Connery, and it didn't take long for the audiences to warm to him in the role.

EDIT: Here's something on that...

It is a completely different scenario, of course, as Oliver Reed was not black, but the discussion of an actor being too rough to play James Bond made me think it worthwhile to discuss the only man who couldn’t play James Bond because he drank too much and was too much of a womanizer.

Oliver Reed’s career as an actor began in the late 1950s when he was in his early 20s. He soon became a popular choice for filmmamkers looking for a “tough guy” in their film. That image of machismo carried over to his life outside of the films, as he became one of the most legendary drunks in all of England
.

The thing about Reed not being black is because the article earlier discussed the "Idris Elba as Bond 'Controversy.'"

And - something actually interesting AND worth reading in the Huffington Post!!

Now...THAT'S something a person doesn't see every day!!

Was Oliver Reed Too ‘Rough’ to Be Cast as James Bond?
 
Last edited:
If Luthor was so smart, he would have absorbed Wayne Enterprises into LexCorp through a hostile takeover when Bruce was missing and not in control.

Is Wayne Enterprises publicly traded or would the hostile takeover involve actually raiding the corporate offices with his goons, like the Allies storming the beaches at Normandy (although in this case it would be the bad guys attacking the good guys)? Or maybe something a bit more subtle - like perhaps farming out the dirty work to The Assassinations Bureau and surreptitiously convincing the board to hand over control.
 
Last edited:
Is Wayne Enterprises publicly traded or would the hostile takeover involve actually raiding the corporate offices with his goons, like the Allies storming the beaches at Normandy (although in this case it would be the bad guys attacking the good guys)? Or maybe something a bit more subtle - like perhaps farming out the dirty work to The Assassinations Bureau and surreptitiously convincing the board to hand over control.

The board was working on making it a publicly traded company when Bruce was declared dead. That was the window of opportunity. Bruce's shares were being sold to the public and by the time he could be legally declared alive, it would have been over. However, Bruce had turned over ownership of the Wayne family fortune to Alfred. They used money Alfred was holding to buy Bruce's shares and maintain control.
 
If Luthor was so smart, he would have absorbed Wayne Enterprises into LexCorp through a hostile takeover when Bruce was missing and not in control.

Luthor was pretty much the big bad dog of Metropolis. His only real nemesis was Superman.

The Gotham side of the harbor would have been a different story.

Gotham was to Metropolis is as Oakland is to San Francisco; as St. Paul is to Minneapolis and as St. Joseph is to Benton Harbor. As fond as my memories of neighboring Ypsilanti are, it's like Ypsilanti is to Ann Arbor.

Gotham itself was full of bad actors, in and out of the Arkham Asylum; who would have been additionally problematic to Luthor in his attempt to take over the (pretty much) singular jewel of Gotham City, Wayne Enterprises.

Arguably Luthor would have had a better chance of taking over Wayne Enterprises when Bruce came back than he would have had while Bruce was gone, as Batman was bringing the underworld element back into control.
 
Unless Forbes missed something, Luthor probably couldn't have outbid Wanye anyway. Wayne is #6 on their fictional 15 list. Luthor isn't even on there. (#1 and #2 are Scrooge McDuck and Smaug.)

https://www.forbes.com/special-report/2013/fictional-15/

Charles Foster Kane wasn't really all that fictional.

I never knew Lara Croft was that rich. If I had, things might have been different.

Nothing wrong DiCapprio at all, but I would have gone with Redford in the pic of Gatsby, myself.
 
Luthor was pretty much the big bad dog of Metropolis. His only real nemesis was Superman.

The Gotham side of the harbor would have been a different story.

Gotham was to Metropolis is as Oakland is to San Francisco; as St. Paul is to Minneapolis and as St. Joseph is to Benton Harbor. As fond as my memories of neighboring Ypsilanti are, it's like Ypsilanti is to Ann Arbor.

Gotham itself was full of bad actors, in and out of the Arkham Asylum; who would have been additionally problematic to Luthor in his attempt to take over the (pretty much) singular jewel of Gotham City, Wayne Enterprises.

Arguably Luthor would have had a better chance of taking over Wayne Enterprises when Bruce came back than he would have had while Bruce was gone, as Batman was bringing the underworld element back into control.

Good point. Ra's al Ghul in particular admitted to an interest in economic manipulation.

 
Uh. *reads, thinks 'man this thread went down hill' bummer*

Oh, hey. according to this Forbes article, Trump should have been on the fictitious rich asshole list, not the real rich asshole list.

I remember during the campaign, longtime Trump biographer Wayne Barrett saying that Trump didn't want to release his tax returns, not because they'd reveal illegal activities*, but because they'd show how little money and income he really had, vis-a-vis his incredible claims.

he was "rich" in the sense of being a multi-millionaire, but not "super rich" in the sense of being on Top 400 lists. his wealth would make him a big man in Peoria or Topeka... but not in NYC, as he desperately craved.

both Barrett's book, and this article show how leveraged he was... the $100 million dollar deals he'd trumpet were financed with 90-95% debt. He'd talk about them though, as though it was mostly equity, and most of his wealth was liquid.

in reality he was only getting in on these deals at the time because his dad had close political connections with the NYC government at the time... Donald had nothing to do with cultivating them, he just used them.

*only a complete buffoon would put illegal income/activity in a tax return... everything filed with the IRS has been laundered or papered over.
 
Uh. *reads, thinks 'man this thread went down hill' bummer*

Oh, hey. according to this Forbes article, Trump should have been on the fictitious rich asshole list, not the real rich asshole list.

I remember during the campaign, longtime Trump biographer Wayne Barrett saying that Trump didn't want to release his tax returns, not because they'd reveal illegal activities*, but because they'd show how little money and income he really had, vis-a-vis his incredible claims.

he was "rich" in the sense of being a multi-millionaire, but not "super rich" in the sense of being on Top 400 lists. his wealth would make him a big man in Peoria or Topeka... but not in NYC, as he desperately craved.

both Barrett's book, and this article show how leveraged he was... the $100 million dollar deals he'd trumpet were financed with 90-95% debt. He'd talk about them though, as though it was mostly equity, and most of his wealth was liquid.

in reality he was only getting in on these deals at the time because his dad had close political connections with the NYC government at the time... Donald had nothing to do with cultivating them, he just used them.

*only a complete buffoon would put illegal income/activity in a tax return... everything filed with the IRS has been laundered or papered over.

I'm kind of surprised he hasn't run into legal trouble for lying to investors.
 
It's pretty well known that the fictitious Biff Tannen in Back to the Future II was based on Donald Trump.

Why would they use that Biff picture for that article? Any of these would be better.

Donald-Trump-Biff-Tannen-Back-to-the-Future-Part-II-568x320.jpg

600x600.jpg

sddefault.jpg
 
http://thehill.com/homenews/media/384366-hannity-hud-shell-companies-report

Fox News host Sean Hannity is linked to a group of shell companies that have spent $90 million buying hundreds of homes across the U.S through the help of foreclosures and the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the Guardian reported Sunday.

More than 870 homes in seven different states have been purchased over the past decade, ranging from large mansions to rentals for low-income families, according to the newspaper.

For some of the mortgages, Hannity reportedly obtained funding from HUD under the National Housing Act loan program, which was first guaranteed under President Obama?s administration.

Secretary Ben Carson?s department recently increased Hannity?s original $17.9 million mortgage for purchases in Georgia by an additional $5 million, records obtained by the Guardian show.

Hannity did not disclose his cooperation with HUD when he had Carson on his show last June, the Guardian noted.

During that segment, Hannity railed against the state of public housing and praised Carson, telling him, ?you?ve done a good job.?

Ethics, smethics.
 
I'm kind of surprised he hasn't run into legal trouble for lying to investors.

He has, many times, and probably more that settled before they got to court, or were under a gag order.

at least in the case of his first bankruptcy, both sides had reason to keep things quiet: Trump because he was revealed as a fraud, and his bankers (including Chase), because it revealed how poorly they did their jobs & easily he defrauded them. They were extending him $10's of Millions based on his lies and his own claimed wealth, without ever actually verifying, because they feared they'd be left out of his deals if they questioned him.

... and these are supposedly the pillars of our economy.


I guess that explains why he's been panicking so much about the raid on Cohen's office.

This kind of corruption is permissible these days though. They only come after someone if they threaten the corrupt power structure, not partake in it. so for example, if you're a bank executive that signs off on fraudulent practices, your bank will only pay a small fine if you're caught. But if you blow the whistle on those practices... you're going to get slammed. And it's the same in the military/defense industry.
 
That's right back to the future predicted trumps!

in other news how far off are we from the alien tech?
A: 10,000 years in the past
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Back
Top