Givers vs takers, by state

[tsmith7559]

math for those in need.....
State A has 1,000 people who all vote

The state is 63% white and votes 80% republican, 37% Black and votes 95% democrat....the Republican wins.

The same state that is 37% Black , 30% of them are on food stamps, 9% of the whites are on food stamps, so 17% of the total population is on food stamps.
State B has a population of 1,000, 92% are white, 8% black.....30% of the blacks are on food stamps, 9% of the whites......11% are on food stamps

 

[tsmith7559]

I'm really not. I'm amazed that you keep posting, but I really don't care if you never post here again.

likewise...I'll keep posting...no need to respond..sounds like a plan

 

[redandguilty]

likewise...I'll keep posting...no need to respond..sounds like a plan

I'm not asking you to stop. I'm just amazed that you don't.

 

[redandguilty]

math for those in need.....
State A has 1,000 people who all vote

The state is 63% white and votes 80% republican, 37% Black and votes 95% democrat....the Republican wins.

The same state that is 37% Black , 30% of them are on food stamps, 9% of the whites are on food stamps, so 17% of the total population is on food stamps.
State B has a population of 1,000, 92% are white, 8% black.....30% of the blacks are on food stamps, 9% of the whites......11% are on food stamps

This example does not make the argument you need it to make regarding takers driving election results.

 

[tsmith7559]

I'm not asking you to stop. I'm just amazed that you don't.

why, I just destroyed your argument, LOL..oh well, have a good night

 

[redandguilty]

why, I just destroyed your argument, LOL..oh well, have a good night

Maybe it would help if you could find one person that agrees with you. Perhaps they could dumb down your math for me to the point where I can understand.

 

[tsmith7559]

This example does not make the argument you need it to make regarding takers driving election results.

just explaining why the southern states have a higher percentage of takers but still can vote republican...please tell me you understand this.

as far as the other swing states mentioned before...when you add 22,000,000 takers from 2008 to 2012...winning those states become harder and most likely are the reason Obama won them. Like I mentioned, white northern males dont vote like southern and rural whites percentages to the rebublican party

 

[tsmith7559]

Maybe it would help if you could find one person that agrees with you. Perhaps they could dumb down your math for me to the point where I can understand.

???? they were beat. Im the only conservative on this forum...why would they agree

 

[Thumb]

???? they were beat. Im the only conservative on this forum...why would they agree

No, you're not.

Just nobody else wants to be associated with you, you gutless cunt.

TyCobb
Byco
Mitch
KAWDUP

All conservatives.

 

[tsmith7559]

No, you're not.

Just nobody else wants to be associated with you, you gutless cunt.

TyCobb
Byco
Mitch
KAWDUP

All conservatives.

yet, you keep responding....

 

[redandguilty]

just explaining why the southern states have a higher percentage of takers but still can vote republican...please tell me you understand this.

as far as the other swing states mentioned before...when you add 22,000,000 takers from 2008 to 2012...winning those states become harder and most likely are the reason Obama won them. Like I mentioned, white northern males dont vote like southern and rural whites percentages to the rebublican party

The number of takers isn't the driving force. Why aren't the non-takers in the swing states as conservative as the solid republican southern state? That's a bigger difference.

 

[tsmith7559]

The number of takers isn't the driving force. Why aren't the non-takers in the swing states as conservative as the solid republican southern state? That's a bigger difference.

more unionized for one....

 

[redandguilty]

No, you're not.

Just nobody else wants to be associated with you, you gutless cunt.

TyCobb
Byco
Mitch
KAWDUP

All conservatives.

So I don't count anymore?

 

[redandguilty]

more unionized for one....

Really? You're going to give me another reason now? After all the arguing that the takers were the driving force, you're going to tell me the difference is unionization?

That's beautiful.

 

[TheVictors]

I will donate ONE-THOUSAND DOLLARS to a charity determined by majority VOTE of the board Members if "tsmith" finally MAN'S UP and lives up to his Word and pays elrod the $1,000 he clearly BET him and still OWES him.

Extensive Documentation of the wager can be found in the thread entitled, Smitty, courtesy of RedandGuilty.

I will pay via PayPal or will provide photographic evidence of the ONE-THOUSAND DOLLAR Charitable Contribution as I AM A REAL MAN AND MY WORD IS TRUE.


So come on, tLIAR ---

........

 

[tsmith7559]

Really? You're going to give me another reason now? After all the arguing that the takers were the driving force, you're going to tell me the difference is unionization?

That's beautiful.

more northern whites vote democratic, in part, because of unions. Coupled with more dependents added throughout the country put Obama over the top in many swing states. Were only talking about 1% to 2.5% difference in most of those states

 

[TheVictors]

I will donate ONE-THOUSAND DOLLARS to a charity determined by majority VOTE of the board Members if "tsmith" finally MAN'S UP and lives up to his Word and pays elrod the $1,000 he clearly BET him and still OWES him.

Extensive Documentation of the wager can be found in the thread entitled, Smitty, courtesy of RedandGuilty.

I will pay via PayPal or will provide photographic evidence of the ONE-THOUSAND DOLLAR Charitable Contribution as I AM A REAL MAN AND MY WORD IS TRUE.


So come on, tLIAR ---

come on, I DARE you ....

punk

 

[tsmith7559]

FDR is an Obama hero...interesting

http://cnsnews.com/blog/ron-meyer/i...ent-voted-obama-it-would-account-75-his-total

 

[redandguilty]

more northern whites vote democratic, in part, because of unions. Coupled with more dependents added throughout the country put Obama over the top in many swing states. Were only talking about 1% to 2.5% difference in most of those states

So just a small swing with northern whites would make all the difference.

 

[tsmith7559]

So just a small swing with northern whites would make all the difference.

No, they are already in the dem column. Just giving a reason why northern whites are more moderate/lib than southern whites

its part of the added 22,000,000 dependents that voted..pushed him over the top