How the Mueller Investigation Could Play Out for Trump

[tigermud]

uh, well, you posted it. You tell me.

 

[Spartanmack]

You carefully compiled a statistical argument to prove to spartanhack that racial bias is prevalent in American society, and he just kept responding, "nuh uh" to every one of your posts, and you still didn't lose your temper.

wrong again dummy. i acknowledged the existence of racial bias from the beginning.

 

[Spartanmack]

Uhhh...what?

what?

 

[jwlcosu]

I am struggling with your part of it. Hyperbolic complaining about journalistic malfeasance and such. I'd love to see a few examples of what you think is a good representation of what the mainstream media has been reporting for years that's factually wrong and driven by unethical bias, but it would be pretty silly of me to expect you to back up your claims with a link.

Requires more work on your part than a simple video but perhaps this will be more amenable to your sensibilities.

https://thefederalist.com/2019/03/27/61-hacks-peddled-russian-collusion-never-trusted/

 

[Gulo Blue]

Requires more work on your part than a simple video but perhaps this will be more amenable to your sensibilities.

https://thefederalist.com/2019/03/27/61-hacks-peddled-russian-collusion-never-trusted/

I think that's a pretty solid link. As good a summary as someone is going to find - probably. But it supports what I'm saying in that it's all tweets, opinion, and talking head stuff. It's not anything out of the ordinary for the stuff surrounding the news to be like this; it's the normal operating procedure of these networks trying to fill time and space. If they can dig up talking heads to deny climate science or support Trump and give him gobs of airtime before the election, they should be expected to do every bit of this.

 

[Gulo Blue]

what?

Your post. It was like you posted from an alternate reality where everything was different. Nothing reflected the words that have been posted to this message board.

 

[Gulo Blue]

wrong again dummy. i acknowledged the existence of racial bias from the beginning.

Yeah, MC. Don't you remember how that thread was a single page? I posted something about racial bias, Spartanmack agreed, and that was the end of it.

 

[Spartanmack]

Yeah, MC. Don't you remember how that thread was a single page? I posted something about racial bias, Spartanmack agreed, and that was the end of it.

where did those goal posts go?

 

[Spartanmack]

Your post. It was like you posted from an alternate reality where everything was different. Nothing reflected the words that have been posted to this message board.

no, you made two stupid posts got called out for both of them then tried to change the subject now youre doubling down.

first, you said eveyone else was more correct than Fox News w/ respect to the Mueller investigation because of a survey of Fox viewers as if that proves Fox reporting on the probe was less accurate. thats just dumb. and you said it without posting a link to the survey or saying anything about the what was in the survey. was it about the Mueller investigation? was it from pew or some other legit source or was it from vox, mother jones, huffpo? was it from before the conclusion of the mueller report and based on the same minformation thats been coming from leftist media?

then, you said i had ignored 80 pages of this thread because everyone here pretty much agreed ther would be no charges for collusion when nothing i posted said or even indicated i thought anyone was expecting anything different. after the report came out, all of my comments have been making fun of the disappointed media who have been misreporting, lying and ignoring their duties as journalists to perform any amount of due diligence. much of this has already been discussed in the pages of this thread. of course, despite nobody really expecting indictments Im sure many her including you are still disappointed it didnt happen - i have no doubt about that.

ive already pointed out all of this of course and instead of admitting you were wrong, your response has been to take a self-righrreous arrogant tone like that half witted douchebag friend of yours, change the subject to your objection being about how i didnt post a link to a timeline of everything the media got wrong.

 

[TheVictors]

For a bunch of douche bags obsessed with “her emails” and a pedophile pizza parlour, you sure are highly sensitive about Mueller.


Ain’t over yet, twats.

 

[jwlcosu]

For a bunch of douche bags obsessed with ?her emails? and a pedophile pizza parlour, you sure are highly sensitive about Mueller.


Ain?t over yet, twats.

You still pushing the pee tape conspiracy?

 

[tigermud]

You still pushing the pee tape conspiracy?

He’s right it’s far from over yet Rudy says 6 months. Although I think that is way too long and disappointing this isn’t about emails and pizza parlors either It goes way beyond that stupid shit

 

[jwlcosu]

He’s right it’s far from over yet Rudy says 6 months. Although I think that is way too long and disappointing this isn’t about emails and pizza parlors either It goes way beyond that stupid shit

Totally agree he’s right that’s it’s not over. It’s just starting to get fun, in fact. There are a few people that need to go down hard for what they’ve done and tried to do.

 

[Gulo Blue]

no, you made two stupid posts got called out for both of them then tried to change the subject now youre doubling down.

first, you said eveyone else was more correct than Fox News w/ respect to the Mueller investigation because of a survey of Fox viewers as if that proves Fox reporting on the probe was less accurate. thats just dumb. and you said it without posting a link to the survey or saying anything about the what was in the survey. was it about the Mueller investigation? was it from pew or some other legit source or was it from vox, mother jones, huffpo? was it from before the conclusion of the mueller report and based on the same minformation thats been coming from leftist media?

then, you said i had ignored 80 pages of this thread because everyone here pretty much agreed ther would be no charges for collusion when nothing i posted said or even indicated i thought anyone was expecting anything different. after the report came out, all of my comments have been making fun of the disappointed media who have been misreporting, lying and ignoring their duties as journalists to perform any amount of due diligence. much of this has already been discussed in the pages of this thread. of course, despite nobody really expecting indictments Im sure many her including you are still disappointed it didnt happen - i have no doubt about that.

ive already pointed out all of this of course and instead of admitting you were wrong, your response has been to take a self-righrreous arrogant tone like that half witted douchebag friend of yours, change the subject to your objection being about how i didnt post a link to a timeline of everything the media got wrong.

Survey was an old memory, which is why I asked it as a question. My impression is that Fox New has a history of just not reporting certain issues and so their viewers aren't as aware. But it might have been back in the Jon Stewart Daily Show days. I legit thought others might remember it too. Maybe I could look it up, but what's the point? Time after time I've put a level of effort into this board supporting what I say, and you don't. If things have changed since then, good for Fox News. Somebody post a link. But that's why I'm skeptical that they got so much more right this time around. The statements require other news entities to have got things wrong. And that's where I'd like to see some evidence of things regularly being reported as news being wrong. I haven't asked for a timeline of all of it, just a few examples of what's typical. Sometime to justify claims of "media who have been misreporting, lying and ignoring their duties as journalists."



The other statement (about 80 pages) was a sort of 'proof is in the pudding' argument. If the media has been reporting it all so incorrectly, why has everyone been so well informed on the topic going back to page 1 of this thread?

 

[Gulo Blue]

where did those goal posts go?

What goal posts are you talking about? You've still never made it clear what you're accusing me of having said.

 

[tigermud]

Dem house intel committee members are in denial.

 

[Spartanmack]

What goal posts are you talking about? You've still never made it clear what you're accusing me of having said.

the ones you're moving.

 

[Spartanmack]

Survey was an old memory, which is why I asked it as a question. My impression is that Fox New has a history of just not reporting certain issues and so their viewers aren't as aware. But it might have been back in the Jon Stewart Daily Show days. I legit thought others might remember it too. Maybe I could look it up, but what's the point? Time after time I've put a level of effort into this board supporting what I say, and you don't. If things have changed since then, good for Fox News. Somebody post a link. But that's why I'm skeptical that they got so much more right this time around. The statements require other news entities to have got things wrong. And that's where I'd like to see some evidence of things regularly being reported as news being wrong. I haven't asked for a timeline of all of it, just a few examples of what's typical. Sometime to justify claims of "media who have been misreporting, lying and ignoring their duties as journalists."



The other statement (about 80 pages) was a sort of 'proof is in the pudding' argument. If the media has been reporting it all so incorrectly, why has everyone been so well informed on the topic going back to page 1 of this thread?

ah, so if it's an old memory and framed like a Jeopardy response, there's no need to post a link, it's a definitive mic drop, applicable to every story, big or small forever. But if it's related to things talked about in this very thread over the past 7+ months (one that you accused others of not paying attention to) then a link w/ a bullet point summary or a timeline is required, otherwise it's hyperbolic ranting. got it.

 

[Spartanmack]

For a bunch of douche bags obsessed with “her emails” and a pedophile pizza parlour, you sure are highly sensitive about Mueller.


Ain’t over yet, twats.

aren't the folks saying it isn't over yet the ones being highly sensitive whiny twats about Mueller? Seems like the other side is pretty satisfied with the outcome so far. Dumbass.

 

[Gulo Blue]

ah, so if it's an old memory and framed like a Jeopardy response, there's no need to post a link, it's a definitive mic drop, applicable to every story, big or small forever. But if it's related to things talked about in this very thread over the past 7+ months (one that you accused others of not paying attention to) then a link w/ a bullet point summary or a timeline is required, otherwise it's hyperbolic ranting. got it.

Who's asking for bullet points? I asked for typical stories. You haven't pointed to anything. No examples of all the journalists who have been misreporting, lying and ignoring their duties.