Thumb
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2011
- Messages
- 18,962
while i had no issue with the wars, the Mission Accomplished banner pissed me off. the mission was to kill OBL, and as much as i am not an Obama fan, he is the one deserving of that banner.
for me, taking out iraq, a known sponsor of terror, gave our forces a second front into which we could take out the iranian regime, another known terror sponsor, and syria, yet another known sponsor of terror.
either you take on terror everywhere or dont declare war on terror. if u r not prepared or willing to do that, then solely focus on taking out OBL and the regime who supported him, the taliban.
bush definitely screwed all that up. there was no need to even mention WMD, if we are fighting terrorists and the nations who sponsor terror, well then there is zero need to bring up WMDs.
This is kind of off the deep end.
Saudi Arabia was found to have citizens that funneled money to terrorists, why don't we attack then as a sponsor of terrorism? Or Qatar or UAE, etc. Oh that's right, because they play kiss ass with us over OIL.
Saying Saddam Hussein was a brutal and oppressive dictator is one thing, it's another to say the FOX/Bush party line of "they were sponsors of terrorism" while offering up not a single scrap of evidence. I'm surprised you didn't say "axis of evil".
And what the hell, why don't we just invade every single sovereign nation on earth that we decide to call "sponsors of terrorism" because after all, they don't love Jesus or eat bacon, so lets forget about laws or anything and just shoot first and sort it out after we install a puppet government.
'MERICA
Last edited: