Jeffrey Epstein matter reopened... going to get ugly

[Spartanmack]

https://www.newsnationnow.com/crime/jeffrey-epstein-list-delayed-jan-22/


Delay delay delay, pathetic.

from the linked piece:

Expert says new charges against named individuals are unlikely

Gee, I wonder why that is...

 

[tigermud]

He liked em young
https://www.businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epstein-list-names-unsealed-doe-court-documents-2024-1

 

[Michchamp]

Will Ohio State take Les Wexler's name off all their stuff, including their football building?


From this story:

Whatever else can be inferred, argued, or established about Wexner?s involvement in Epstein?s child-sex- trafficking and sexual-blackmail operations, it?s indisputable that Epstein was for a long period of time Wexner?s closest advisor, and that Wexner was effectively Epstein?s sponsor, having paid (or given) him hundreds of millions of dollars over the course of their relationship and providing him the material support for everything he did. Wexner purchased Epstein?s vast New Albany mansion (which was next door to Wexner?s) and his $70-million Manhattan townhouse where many of Epstein?s victims are alleged to have been abused. Epstein also used his relationship with Wexner to lure his victims in with promises of lucrative modeling jobs and other positions within Wexner?s empire.

​

I'm sure OSU would like this to blow over as soon as possible as well...


Well, most OSU fans are too dumb to know or care, but the administration who would have to endure the headaches involved in taking rich scumbags' names off things, when it turns out - SURPRISE - you can't really be a billionaire without having committed some massive crimes, stepped on a lot of people, or outright looted some groups' pension funds or other collective pools of money, like Harvard and the Sacklers...

 

[sggatecl]

He liked em young
https://www.businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epstein-list-names-unsealed-doe-court-documents-2024-1

 

[tigermud]

Trump was one of those cleared of any wrongdoing in the documents but was mentioned in four instances. In two instances, he was named in relation to his casinos. In the other two, a witness said she never saw or massaged the former president.

Trump's representatives did not respond to the Washington Examiner's request for comment.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/courts/epstein-list-six-biggest-names-court-documents

Thumb will be disappointed

 

[Thumb]

Trump was one of those cleared of any wrongdoing in the documents but was mentioned in four instances. In two instances, he was named in relation to his casinos. In the other two, a witness said she never saw or massaged the former president.

Trump's representatives did not respond to the Washington Examiner's request for comment.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/courts/epstein-list-six-biggest-names-court-documents

Thumb will be disappointed

Not at all.

I said Trump would be mentioned, and he was. I never said anyone or everyone who knew or had any kind of relationship with Epstein was guilty of anything, that's the kind of thing the conspiracy guys say.

Though, the link you provided is pretty biased, and, or stupid. Notice Bill Clinton was not accused of any wrongdoing, but Trump was "cleared of any wrongdoing". What's the difference, and who decides what was wrongdoing?

 

[byco42]

Re: post 403. Whitney Webb considers Epstein's financial malfeasance with Wexner, Goldman Sachs, usw., on par with his sexual-gratification machina as to the scale of evil doing. They were complimentary.

Naturally the vapid MSM has ignored this.

I was unaware that Wexner had such close ties to The Ohio State University. I wonder what the regents and high officials of the University knew about him before they plastered his name all over their campus.

If they knew what Whitney Webb knew or had some suspicion at least, what punishment, sanctions, or consequences should the football program receive, since its success over that span was enabled by a literal sex-trafficking operation, funded by a guy who, after practically signing his life over to Epstein, said that he "took advantage" of [Wexner]. I guess background checks weren't necessary in the case of Epstein.

 

[tigermud]

Not at all.

I said Trump would be mentioned, and he was. I never said anyone or everyone who knew or had any kind of relationship with Epstein was guilty of anything, that's the kind of thing the conspiracy guys say.

Though, the link you provided is pretty biased, and, or stupid. Notice Bill Clinton was not accused of any wrongdoing, but Trump was "cleared of any wrongdoing". What's the difference, and who decides what was wrongdoing?

Nobody named is going to be charged with anything whether they did anything wrong or not. it's about exposing those that went to his island to bring to light that what was hidden in the dark, rumors are there are tapes that may or may not ever see the light of day.

If true I am suspicious of it since we have now entered the age of deep fakes we will no longer be able to trust anything we see either.

 

[tigermud]

https://x.com/Techno_Fog/status/1744399900626780528?s=20

 

[tinselwolverine]

Nobody named is going to be charged with anything whether they did anything wrong or not. it's about exposing those that went to his island to bring to light that what was hidden in the dark, rumors are there are tapes that may or may not ever see the light of day.

If true I am suspicious of it since we have now entered the age of deep fakes we will no longer be able to trust anything we see either.

What about Jimmy Kimmel?

 

[byco42]

I hope that just isn?t some brand of a limited hangout that is making a few players walk the plank as the rest who are still relevant to the globalists? agenda of total control of resources, information and minds escape justice.

 

[tigermud]

What about Jimmy Kimmel?

What about him, I haven't watched or listened to anything he's had to say for years.

 

[byco42]

What about him, I haven't watched or listened to anything he's had to say for years.

The strings connected to all the vital joints of these puppets on television have never been more visible.

 

[Spartanmack]

Not a single bit of evidence anywhere that Kimmel ever associated with Epstein but you just know he must be guilty of something. Meanwhile, there are photos all over the internet of Trump hanging out with Epstein but that totally doesn't mean anything.

I understand though, Kimmel mocks Trump so you must defend the orange man no matter what, even if that means making shit up.

pretty sure that was a reference to these people running cover for the political class. Jimmy Kimmel is a tool, not a target, hence the "puppet strings"

Try to keep up.

 

[tinselwolverine]

What about him, I haven't watched or listened to anything he's had to say for years.

I was making a joke. He and Aaron Rogers have had a back and forth for a while.

I think Aaron Rogers was making a joke too.

Really not much to see here. I wish I hadn?t attempted the joke.

 

[byco42]

I'm convinced that JBH's rants and responses are voice-driven. They don't read like writing. When he spews his nonsense, it all angles down to Trump. Because entertainers are propaganda pawns, and I say that, JBH concludes I'm a Trump supporter. Here's another one then: Taylor Swift is a PSYOP.

Have at it, Foreigner Lover

 

[Spartanmack]

Ahhhh yes, the vast Hollywood conspiracy to provide cover for those evil Democrats and their attempts to make life better for people.

Exactly who are they making life better for? I would argue they?re not even trying and if they were, they?re failing. Good intentions (which again, they lack) aren?t good enough.

 

[Spartanmack]

I'm convinced that right wing conspiracy theorists can't keep their composure when their bullshit is called out. Their fragile little world comes crashing down when someone shows up and introduces facts into the discussion.

You?re the only one losing their mind here with your rage posting - and obviously the only who can?t see that. You also don?t seem to realize shouting ?conspiracy theory? isn?t ?bringing facts to the discussion?. You have yet to post a single fact, yet managed to prove a lot about yourself (nothing to be proud of).

 

[byco42]

Don't look now, but a lot of speakers at Davos are going off on the self-appointed World leaders. It's about time.

 

[tigermud]

I was making a joke. He and Aaron Rogers have had a back and forth for a while.

I think Aaron Rogers was making a joke too.

Really not much to see here. I wish I hadn?t attempted the joke.

I ended up hearing about it on some pod cast I was listening to the other day were they brought up the Pat Mcafee Rogers ban now I guess idk. it all seems rather stupid. Aaron is probably a closet Alex Jones fan so he's mostly OK now that he's not in GB. I think the pod cast was Investigate Earth Conspiracy or something. I don't recall.