Motherfuckers

[zyxt9]

I think his point is that the UN could never be neutral to Israel. Your idea sounds good in theory but based on the UN Security Council's and UN Committee on Human Rights' voting history, it's hard to see where the UN could even be impartial let alone ever put the might of world against anyone who moves against Israel.

Granted the UN is currently = Bull Tits; however, there is always hope that in the future some sort of usefulness may come from them. Maybe that won't happen until after WWIII, but there is some hope. This current iteration, useless as it is, still remain more useful than the League of Nations....so maybe the next version will actually work.

That will likely face many problems though, as they would likely be more akin to a World Government, which many are very much against.

 

[Michchamp]

Foley was waterboarded as well...

"Before he was executed, American journalist James Foley was waterboarded by his Islamic State captors.

Foley was among four hostages who were waterboarded several times while in the clutches of the merciless terror group, sources told the Washington Post."
​

The horror. What kind of depraved psychopaths would waterboard another human being?

We better go to war ASAP to prevent this from happening again.

 

[Gulo Blue]

How long has it been since I've posted this bit from Mark Twain?

Funston's example has bred many imitators, and many ghastly additions to our history: the torturing of Filipinos by the awful "water cure," for instance, to make them confess?what? Truth? Or lies ? How can one know which it is they are telling ? For under unendurable pain a man confesses anything that is required of him, true or false, and his evidence is worthless.

Although the water cure mentioned in this book actually sounds worse than water boarding, I am amazed at how little we've changed since 1902. Well, we've certainly changed; I guess it would be better to say it's amazing how we can slip so badly and repeat our past mistakes.

 

[jwlcosu]

Another American journalist has his head sawed off:

http://washington.cbslocal.com/2014...s-to-show-beheading-of-another-us-journalist/

A Brit is said to be next on the block. If only it were a block.

What do you think, fellas? Are these untermenschen to be negotiated with? Or is it time to rout the motherfuckers?

 

[Michchamp]

Another American journalist has his head sawed off:

http://washington.cbslocal.com/2014...s-to-show-beheading-of-another-us-journalist/

A Brit is said to be next on the block. If only it were a block.

What do you think, fellas? Are these untermenschen to be negotiated with? Or is it time to rout the motherfuckers?

We're right behind you, sarge

 

[jwlcosu]

Granted the UN is currently = Bull Tits; however, there is always hope that in the future some sort of usefulness may come from them. Maybe that won't happen until after WWIII, but there is some hope. This current iteration, useless as it is, still remain more useful than the League of Nations....so maybe the next version will actually work.

That will likely face many problems though, as they would likely be more akin to a World Government, which many are very much against.

Is your name Salinger?

 

[TheVictors]

Stupid.

 

[Thumb]

Another American journalist has his head sawed off:

http://washington.cbslocal.com/2014...s-to-show-beheading-of-another-us-journalist/

A Brit is said to be next on the block. If only it were a block.

What do you think, fellas? Are these untermenschen to be negotiated with? Or is it time to rout the motherfuckers?

You think if we invade and attack them they will kill fewer reporters?

I don't understand your logic. They killed some reporters, but let's go get a bunch of our soldiers killed to prove you can't kill a couple guys and get away with it.

 

[jwlcosu]

Startling indifference.

 

[Sbee]

Startling indifference.

let's bomb somebody, anybody, now!!!

 

[zyxt9]

These guys are likely being held in Syria which would mean a SEAL Team going in. Like when they took out OBL, they could take out the terrorists and have zero casualties themselves. Obviously that could also result in the opposite, but if Obama chooses that option, how many of you Liberals are going to march on DC and demand Obama be impeached? Or scream about the death of "innocent" Muslims who are likely at that same compound?

I wish some of you Liberals would join up with the terrorists so you could really grasp what they are doing, because you support not doing anything to stop them for some unfathomable reason when you constantly preach about how terrible Cons are for their "attrocities" and demand they be removed from office. Yet these terrorists are literally killing any infidels, which you are a member of and they would kill you just like they continue to do to thousands of actually innocent civilians, and will gladly kill millions more if able to do so.

But yeah,let's NOT try to do what we can to take these guys out,right? These guys who the other extremist groups view as being fucked in the head. Oh! That must be it! ISIS is finally achieving what you desire! Got it!

 

[zyxt9]

let's bomb somebody, anybody, now!!!

Pretty sure the stated target has always been terrorists, and in this specific situation ISIS. When did anyone ever advocate attacking and killing "anyone". If that was the case, you would be on that list, but you are not because we are not like ISIS, we actually believe you have the right to voice your opinion, regardless of the degree we disagree with it.

 

[byco42]

This (ISIS) is an infestation not easily eradicated. And it's headed for Saudi Arabia. These are mere rumblings of what's coming. We're on the hit list, too. All of us.

 

[Sbee]

This (ISIS) is an infestation not easily eradicated. And it's headed for Saudi Arabia. These are mere rumblings of what's coming. We're on the hit list, too. All of us.

we're fighting an ideology, it's hard to pinpoint obviously. this is what happens when we try to install a secular democracy in nations that have deep tribal affiliations and have no desire for collaborative government. All of these Sunni's and baathist were left out of the new government structure and joined this movement. there are more civil wars going on there than you could imagine, you'll never have peace there unless there is some kind of power sharing.

 

[Michchamp]

This (ISIS) is an infestation not easily eradicated. And it's headed for Saudi Arabia. These are mere rumblings of what's coming. We're on the hit list, too. All of us.

maybe we should sign a peace treaty with them instead of Saudi Arabia?

Did you know something like 18 of the 20 9/11 hijackers were Saudi Arabian citizens? And there was an awful lot of "dark money" funneled from the peninsula into Al Qaeda's coffers.

the Saudi government & royal family aren't exactly very nice people either. they would probably just assume spit on all of us American peasants as befriend us.

 

[Gulo Blue]

Might seem too idealistic for some of y'all, but in the long term, I think Iran legalizing high speed internet yesterday (in defiance of an Ayatollah) is going to do more to combat ISIS-like organizations than whatever our response is here.

 

[Sbee]

Might seem too idealistic for some of y'all, but in the long term, I think Iran legalizing high speed internet yesterday (in defiance of an Ayatollah) is going to do more to combat ISIS-like organizations than whatever our response is here.

absolutely, teach them English and move call centers from India, give them a chance at a decent living and the ability to support their families.

Fighting the supply side of terrorism will only create more supply.

 

[Thumb]

Startling indifference.

Not indifferent at all. I don't like the idea of ISIS, but I also don't like the idea of us getting involved in another war in Iraq/Syria.

Whats startling is turds like you who just want to go blow some shit up without thinking of the consequences. If the US government knew in 2003 what they know today, do you think we would have invaded Iraq? Why would we make the same mistake twice?

 

[Thumb]

These guys are likely being held in Syria which would mean a SEAL Team going in. Like when they took out OBL, they could take out the terrorists and have zero casualties themselves. Obviously that could also result in the opposite, but if Obama chooses that option, how many of you Liberals are going to march on DC and demand Obama be impeached? Or scream about the death of "innocent" Muslims who are likely at that same compound?

I wish some of you Liberals would join up with the terrorists so you could really grasp what they are doing, because you support not doing anything to stop them for some unfathomable reason when you constantly preach about how terrible Cons are for their "attrocities" and demand they be removed from office. Yet these terrorists are literally killing any infidels, which you are a member of and they would kill you just like they continue to do to thousands of actually innocent civilians, and will gladly kill millions more if able to do so.

But yeah,let's NOT try to do what we can to take these guys out,right? These guys who the other extremist groups view as being fucked in the head. Oh! That must be it! ISIS is finally achieving what you desire! Got it!

It took 11 years to get OBL you dipshit.

 

[jwlcosu]

This (ISIS) is an infestation not easily eradicated. And it's headed for Saudi Arabia. These are mere rumblings of what's coming. We're on the hit list, too. All of us.

Possibly on a commercial aircraft:

http://freebeacon.com/national-secu...ise-fears-of-suicide-airliner-attacks-on-911/