this is a misguided line of reasoning (if you can even call it that). Science isn't supposed to have "answers." science is just a method of testing hypotheses, and investigating existing phenomena.
and by the way... as a method of explaining the physical laws of the universe (and there are no other kind) science works. religion doesn't.
what if we go with the premise that your Hebrew god doesn't exist? And can you explain the basis for the statement that science should be "considered" in its infancy? Whatever that means...
let's review:
1. YOU brought God into this when you started the thread.
2. I not once specified "my Hebrew God"...which for the record I do not own, control, or in any fashion claim superiority or governance over any God.
3. I specifically left God in as ambiguous manner as possible, even provided for the feelings of atheists in very clear terms. If you are incapable of understanding that, it would be a YOU problem, not a me problem.
4. As always, you got all bent at the mere thought that I was actually invoking God or defending religion. At no point did I proclaim superiority of religion, tried to argue God's existence, or any other elemental religious things. Yet you have chosen to attack me and my religious beliefs in a personal way, acting out like an internet bully. Sorry, I don't back down to bullies and I will continue to call you out on this to whatever degree is necessary.
5. I have a very good understanding of physics, math, geology, chemistry, astronomy, and other scientific and technological areas. Science most certainly DOES have answers, solutions, resolutions, and quantifications or whatever synonym you wish to toss around casually. I have immense respect for Science, and I at no time disputed the ability of Science to provide us insights into the universe. I am very much a man of Science, so please do not ever make the mistake that I place inaccurate information from biblical or other theological answers above the answers Science has provided to date.
6. YOU proclaimed Hawking the "smartest man in the world". I merely cast doubt that such a title is befitting him and provided ample support to my reasoning.
As for why I said Science is in its infancy, that should be abundantly clear from my previous post. There is far too much that Science does not know or understand even about Earth, let alone the Moon, Sun, Planets, other solar systems, galaxies, atoms, sub-atomic particles, and these are just some of the physics based things that Science barely understands. How many people are upset because in their opinion we have explored more of the moon and space than we have our own oceans? We have yet to reach the Earth's mantle and only recently have theorized a very thin layer that might exist between the crust and mantle. Technological advances have been awesome in the past 100 years, yet so many things are yet to be developed. Modern medicine has come a long way, yet so many medical issues are waiting for cures. So many things Science still has to uncover, the list is astronomical.
Still, I'm not counting on Religion to provide those answers, I am counting on Science...but that does not make me atheistic or agnostic, for those opinions are not ones I share and I have a right to my opinion, do I not Mr. Lawyer? Do I and others not have the right to believe as we individually and freely choose?
