The Official MICHIGAN vs Rutgers Score Prediction Thread

[TheVictors]

Little Vic says ..

MICHIGAN - 27
Rutgers - 10


I will go with ...

MICHIGAN - 30
Rutgers - 3

I don't think NJSU will be able to do much against the defense and a more ...paced M offense finally shows life.

And thanks ..my Dad is doing okay, but recovery will be slow.

 

[michdad1]

we're all bundled with Comcast - WiFi/TV/Home Security - but had issues with the BTN contract and other nonsense when it comes to these contracts. Bullshit!

I had the triple bundle package which generally costs over $300/mth. I run Hulu from my business internet Hulu has been great.

 

[michdad1]

Little Vic says ..

MICHIGAN - 27
Rutgers - 10


I will go with ...

MICHIGAN - 30
Rutgers - 3

I don't think NJSU will be able to do much against the defense and a more ...paced M offense finally shows life.

And thanks ..my Dad is doing okay, but recovery will be slow.

My mom is 85 and she was having symptoms of a stroke in July and went to the hospital. They immediately took her into Quadruple bypass surgery. She recovered pretty well, so I can understand. Hope your dad recovers fast and well.

 

[hungry]

The Rutgers starting QB has been ruled out due to a concussion.

Anyone picking Michigan to lose, should have to not post for a week if they win

I'll match the bet. If Michigan loses, I won't post for the next week.

 

[thewolverines24]

I?ll go with the same score as was in Middle Tennessee State.



Michigan 40



Rutgers 21



No danger but Michigan doesn?t cover the spread for the fourth game in a row this season.

We have missed the spread by at least 2 TDs for 6 straight games.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

 

[Spartanmack]

uofm 41
Rutgers 6

 

[UMRules06]

Michigan 27 Rutgers 13

 

[umsparty]

Seriously the only score I will accept is 55+ to 0.

Is there a little wiggle room here?

 

[Spartanmack]

Is there a little wiggle room here?

no wiggle room for posters who predict a loss. Show the whole post..

Rutgers 24 Michigan 17. It goes from bad to worse losing to Rutgers . Seriously the only score I will accept is 55+ to 0. They better show fire and at least some competence on offense and defense.

 

[TheVictors]

Rutgers 24 Michigan 17. It goes from bad to worse losing to Rutgers . Seriously the only score I will accept is 55+ to 0. They better show fire and at least some competence on offense and defense.

Based on the ...tone, Id say no and hold you to your Rutgers prediction but glad the Wolverines came within 3pts of being acceptable!

Nobody called a shut out and I said NJSU, 3.

Nobody had M higher than Tinsel?s 40 from the MTSU game but he gave RU 21 for a Total Diff of (21+12=33)

My call for 30-3 has a Total Diff of (3+22=25) with supportive analysis of, ?I don't think NJSU will be able to do much against the defense and a more ...paced M offense finally shows life.?


Just good to see the players having fun! Milton looked sharp ...Shea getting his swag back a bit - I like it!

 

[dubbsco]

Milton has a freaking cannon. I would love to see him get more reps.

 

[hungry]

A lot of people predicted a struggle, but now will say winning 52 to 0 is meaningless.

I still wonder how meaningful it is, but at least I called the no struggle part

 

[rumseyhouse77]

Based on the ...tone, Id say no and hold you to your Rutgers prediction but glad the Wolverines came within 3pts of being acceptable!

Nobody called a shut out and I said NJSU, 3.

Nobody had M higher than Tinsel?s 40 from the MTSU game but he gave RU 21 for a Total Diff of (21+12=33)

My call for 30-3 has a Total Diff of (3+22=25) with supportive analysis of, ?I don't think NJSU will be able to do much against the defense and a more ...paced M offense finally shows life.?


Just good to see the players having fun! Milton looked sharp ...Shea getting his swag back a bit - I like it!

I had Michigan at 42 (and Rutgers at 14). How are you calculating the Total Diff?

 

[GoBlueInAtlanta]

I had Michigan at 42 (and Rutgers at 14). How are you calculating the Total Diff?

52-42=10
0-14=14
10+14=24


You beat Vic by 1.

 

[TheVictors]

Yeah, you win the Score Prediction thread. Missed the first post ....


“I will be disappointed if this team gets booed in the Big House. Not surprised, but disappointed.”

 

[biggunsbob]

No wiggle room. My pick was a protest pick. I lost. They better keep showing up under jimmy and Donny or it could be a long season. Rutgers is by far the worst team I have Ever watched on a football field. I did expect them to roll. Just didn?t want to pick them I was so frustrated with our effort at Wisconsin with 2 weeks to prepare.

 

[biggunsbob]

Also on defense. Donny?s team beat a inferior opponent and did what it was supposed to do. Not sure if getting is shutout verses Rutgers is that special but I am told holding teams to zero is pretty hard. Still the underneath pass was open all day. Maybe it was part of the plan. That them catch it underneath and hit them. But other teams will still be using it. I hope we are ready for Iowa !

 

[biggunsbob]

Milton has a freaking cannon. I would love to see him get more reps.

We noticed that in person. Also he is really big for a Quarterback. I agree would love him to get a shot.

 

[hungry]

Milton will have a shot next spring.

 

[Spartanmack]

52-42=10
0-14=14
10+14=24


You beat Vic by 1.

not so fast...post 26 of this thread:

uofm 41
Rutgers 6

52-41=11
6-0=6

11+6=17

By the way, this is a really dumb way to determine the winner in this case. It should be be determined by who was closest to the actual margin of victory and obviously you won't always get that result with this method. In case it's not obvious, here's a hypothetical situation that demonstrates the obvious flaw:

Prediction 1: 42-13
Prediction 2: 41-0
actual score: 52-6

The actual margin of victory is 46 (52-6). Predictor 2 missed the difference by 5 vs. 17 for predictor 1 but using this nonsensical method, they would be tied - obviously, that makes no sense.

The current method could be a good tie breaker where people predict the same margin of victory and I can even see it overriding margin of victory in cases where say a person accurately predicts the margin of victory but has a total that is way off while another predicts something close to the margin and much closer to the total.