Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Today's example of Christians behaving well

It's a pretty huge jump to connect those dots in to saying that Jesus said marriage is between a man and a woman. Let's forget for a moment the whole jesus = god thing and just take that whoever jesus was, his message was primarily about love, compassion and understanding. But some people just can't see the forest for the trees, and will continue to use his life as a basis for hate and discrimination. Though it seems at least that your pope knows the forest is out there, I hope he prays for you.

I hope he prays for me too.

And in case anyone has any question what I want the Pope to pray for for me...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RBHZFYpQ6nc
 
Last edited:
I can’t account for their cognitive dissonance. I also offered many examples that clearly illustrate the point and I question if you even reviewed them. All of them referred to only man and woman. And there’s the 9th Commandment, too. If you chose to ignore this evidence, that’s your prerogative.

Our Blessed Lord commands us to love our neighbor. And his message also was about repentance. The pope is in error in regards to his position on civil unions. My opposition to his position does not translate to “hate” but merely “opposition.” Besides, the Supreme Court has decided on this issue, in error, but it has decided.

As for the Holy Father, I know that he does pray for me as I do for him. Every day, during my daily Rosary.

If DSF has taught me anything these last however many years, it's that the only possible reason for disagreeing with the leftist worldview is because you hate whatever group on their hierarchy of victimhood you happen to be marginalizing in that discussion. The only way to "win" is to acquiesce to their world view because as a cis gender white male (apologies if I miss-raced or gendered you there, I'm playing the odds), you're the base of that pyramid or hierarchy and therefore yours is by far the least virtuous opinion. I think it's actually been determined by the upper rungs of the ladder (because they're the true experts on love and tolerance) that folks in with your group identity aren't entitled to an opinion on such matters, unless your opinion is the same as theirs.

Whiteness is evil, cis gender male whiteness is pure evil, unless you acknowledge the fact that by dint of birth, you're evil and blame the white male patriarchy for everything, even if the thing it's (you're) being blamed for isn't really happening.
 
Last edited:
If DSF has taught me anything these last however many years, it's that the only possible reason for disagreeing with the far leftist worldview is because you hate whatever group on their hierarchy of victimhood you happen to be marginalizing in that discussion. The only way to "win" is to acquiesce to their world view because as a cis gender white male (apologies if I miss-raced or gendered you there, I'm playing the odds), you're the base of that pyramid or hierarchy and therefore yours is by far the least virtuous opinion. I think it's actually been determined by the upper rungs of the ladder (because they're the true experts on love and tolerance) that folks in with your group identity aren't entitled to an opinion on such matters, unless your opinion is the same as theirs.

Whiteness is evil, cis gender male whiteness is pure evil, unless you acknowledge the fact that by dint of birth, you're evil and blame the white male patriarchy for everything, even if the thing it's (you're) being blamed for isn't really happening.

Similar to what liberals do when they call all people on the right racists, you left out a word. I added it for you.
 
Being neither religious nor LGBTQ? and also not caring what the LGBTQ? do or don’t do, I don’t have strong opinions on this; I did enjoy bringing sex toys and Tevye into the discussion.

This does remind me of something I kinda been wondering about -is AOC Catholic?

I assumed - correctly, as it turned out, that she was raised Catholic - it didn’t take Sherlock Holmes nor even his kid sister to figure that one out - but is she still?

So the link is to what the Catholic League has to say about that.
 
Last edited:
Being neither religious nor LGBTQ? and also not caring what the LGBTQ? do or don?t do, I don?t have strong opinions on this; I did enjoy bringing sex toys and Tevye into the discussion.

This does remind me of something I kinda been wondering about -is AOC Catholic?

I assumed - correctly, as it turned out, that she was raised Catholic - it didn?t take Sherlock Holmes nor even his kid sister to figure that one out - but is she still?

So the link is to what the Catholic League has to say about that.

Today is the feast of Christ the King. I doubt that AOC is aware.
 
Today is the feast of Christ the King. I doubt that AOC is aware.

Well, if she?s not I?m going to give her a pass, because I wasn?t either, and now that you?ve informed me it?s not going to change my plans for the day.

Growing up conscripted to attending Catholic Mass, every Sunday seemed to be the feast for some such thing or other; the feast of the Lilliputians or the Houyhnhnms or the Brobdingnagians or the Not Ready for Prime Time Players or the Pro Sports Diary Authors, or whatever; but don?t recall one by the name of what you said today is.
 
Well, if she?s not I?m going to give her a pass, because I wasn?t either, and now that you?ve informed me it?s not going to change my plans for the day.

Growing up conscripted to attending Catholic Mass, every Sunday seemed to be the feast for some such thing or other; the feast of the Lilliputians or the Houyhnhnms or the Brobdingnagians or the Not Ready for Prime Time Players or the Pro Sports Diary Authors, or whatever; but don?t recall one by the name of what you said today is.

Well, the feast of Christ the King is a relative newcomer tp the Liturgical Calendar. It was established in 1925.
 
Well, the feast of Christ the King is a relative newcomer tp the Liturgical Calendar. It was established in 1925.

That is pretty recent.

Calvin Coolidge was inaugurated president that year, the one time he had been elected to the post.

The Pirates beat the Washington Senators in the World Series.

In college football, Michigan won the national championship, sharing it with Dartmouth, Washington, Tulane, and Alabama.

Back in them days, Michigan won or shared the national championship pretty much every season.

I remember it like it was yesterday.
 
That is pretty recent.

Calvin Coolidge was inaugurated president that year, the one time he had been elected to the post.

The Pirates beat the Washington Senators in the World Series.

In college football, Michigan won the national championship, sharing it with Dartmouth, Washington, Tulane, and Alabama.

Back in them days, Michigan won or shared the national championship pretty much every season.

I remember it like it was yesterday.

Sam Rice made a controversial catch in the 1925 WS. Calvin Coolidge was in attendance.
 
Similar to what liberals do when they call all people on the right racists, you left out a word. I added it for you.

a misunderstanding on your part, but an easy one to make. I use the term "leftist" where most conservatives will mistakenly use the term "liberal" and the distinction is significant. True liberals - people who support free speech and the open exchange if ideas - have almost nothing in common with leftists which are mostly radical reactionary morons who go around calling people racist and fascist for disagreeing with them and burning down cities, silencing opposition with violence, etc - real fascism to fight fake fascism. Case in point, you would be an example of what I would consider a liberal, others on here I would only refer to as leftists, and a certain moderator I would say is definitely a fascist.
 
Last edited:
If DSF has taught me anything these last however many years, it's that the only possible reason for disagreeing with the leftist worldview is because you hate whatever group on their hierarchy of victimhood you happen to be marginalizing in that discussion. The only way to "win" is to acquiesce to their world view because as a cis gender white male (apologies if I miss-raced or gendered you there, I'm playing the odds), you're the base of that pyramid or hierarchy and therefore yours is by far the least virtuous opinion. I think it's actually been determined by the upper rungs of the ladder (because they're the true experts on love and tolerance) that folks in with your group identity aren't entitled to an opinion on such matters, unless your opinion is the same as theirs.

Whiteness is evil, cis gender male whiteness is pure evil, unless you acknowledge the fact that by dint of birth, you're evil and blame the white male patriarchy for everything, even if the thing it's (you're) being blamed for isn't really happening.


I don't think you learned that here. You learned it somewhere else and project it on everything here. Sometimes I learn of these things from you complaining about them (e.g., intersectionality.)
 
Last edited:
Today is the feast of Christ the King. I doubt that AOC is aware.
Isn't it kind of weird when we project monarchy onto Christ? Shepherd makes sense. Family unit makes sense. Monarch seems like we're playing a role in a Passion play: "Are you King?" "You have said so."
 
Isn't it kind of weird when we project monarchy onto Christ? Shepherd makes sense. Family unit makes sense. Monarch seems like we're playing a role in a Passion play: "Are you King?" "You have said so."

A lot of people want to have a king lead them, so they make this shit up.
 
Isn't it kind of weird when we project monarchy onto Christ? Shepherd makes sense. Family unit makes sense. Monarch seems like we're playing a role in a Passion play: "Are you King?" "You have said so."

Quite the contrary; it is most appropriate to acknowledge our Creator as our King. He considers Himself as one. It's why I genuflect and cross myself every time I enter a Catholic Church or a chapel that houses the Blessed Sacrament.

You cited either Mark or Matthew. Here is the your answer from Luke 18:36. and Luke 18:37
 
Isn't it kind of weird when we project monarchy onto Christ? Shepherd makes sense. Family unit makes sense. Monarch seems like we're playing a role in a Passion play: "Are you King?" "You have said so."

It is weird.

Definitely makes more sense to project monarchy onto AOC.

Not that I can?t imagine situations where I would be on my knees in front of her.
 
Quite the contrary; it is most appropriate to acknowledge our Creator as our King. He considers Himself as one. It's why I genuflect and cross myself every time I enter a Catholic Church or a chapel that houses the Blessed Sacrament.

You cited either Mark or Matthew. Here is the your answer from Luke 18:36. and Luke 18:37


The analogy is used talking to Pilot. Are we typically more like Roman Governors passing judgement or are we bothers and sisters or are we like sheep?
 
Back
Top