What people would those be Tom?
Boston's pitching did not really shut us down. If fact our pitching shut them down much better. We outhit Boston 50-39 in the ALCS. They outscored us 19-18. The fact is they hit much better with RISP. They didn't give AB's away.
While some credit goes to Boston's bullpen pitchers (they scored more late inning runs) it was a problem for the Tigers all year long scoring late.
Our starting pitching shut them down better than their starters did. That much is true. Sanchez and Scherzer both were flirting with no-hitters in the first two games at Fenway.
Detroit Starters: 39.1 IP, 27 H, 9 ER, 2.07 ERA, 55 Ks, 15 BB, 1.07 WHIP
Boston Starters: 32.0 IP, 34 H, 17 ER, 4.78 ERA, 26 Ks, 9 BB, 1.34 WHIP
Detroit Bullpen: 12.2 IP, 12 H,
7 ER, 4.97 ERA, 18 Ks, 3 BB, 1.23 WHIP
Boston Bullpen: 21.0 IP, 16 H,
1 ER, 0.43 ERA, 16 Ks, 9 BB, 1.19 WHIP
The question really becomes, who do you place the blame/credit for the late inning runs? Is it more Boston's hitters coming through with the "timely hit"? Or is it the Detroit bullpen failing to do it's job? On the flip side, the Tigers failing to produce late inning runs, was that a product of Detroit hitters failing, or the Boston bullpen doing it's job well?
Probably could argue about it until we're blue in the face. I just can't stand seeing all those late runs allowed, and just wish we didn't have to worry about that problem.