Trump rallies... yikes.

[Spartanmack]

The list of people who need the 1st Amendment explained to them gets longer every day. You can add his name right after BLM, SJWs and all the special snowflakes on America's campuses.

 

[sggatecl]

 

[Monster]

The list of people who need the 1st Amendment explained to them gets longer every day. You can add his name right after BLM, SJWs and all the special snowflakes on America's campuses.

God damn it. I hate when I have to agree with you.

Freedom of speech protects us from the government and prosecution. That's all. It's really not that difficult to understand. It doesn't protect you from criticism. It doesn't protect you from being removed from a private event for expressing your opinion. And inciting violence isn't a violation of the first amendment, but it is illegal. Trump has been very loose with his words and I'll be shocked if somebody doesn't go after him for it.

Honestly, I hate this election year. It's the election of far left vs. far right. Shit flinging morons against SJW's. I'm stuck in the middle-left and have seen my moderate candidate (hillary) move more left on racial, feminist, and economic issues. As of now, she's still my pick, but only by default.

This is a clown show. I'm over it.

 

[sggatecl]

God damn it. I hate when I have to agree with you.

Freedom of speech protects us from the government and prosecution. That's all. It's really not that difficult to understand. It doesn't protect you from criticism. It doesn't protect you from being removed from a private event for expressing your opinion. And inciting violence isn't a violation of the first amendment, but it is illegal. Trump has been very loose with his words and I'll be shocked if somebody doesn't go after him for it.

Honestly, I hate this election year. It's the election of far left vs. far right. Shit flinging morons against SJW's. I'm stuck in the middle-left and have seen my moderate candidate (hillary) move more left on racial, feminist, and economic issues. As of now, she's still my pick, but only by default.

This is a clown show. I'm over it.

On the bright side, when she inevitably wins, I'm sure she'll shift back to whatever position on issues she had before she needed votes. I don't think you'll ever have to worry about super left Hillary.

 

[Monster]

On the bright side, when she inevitably wins, I'm sure she'll shift back to whatever position on issues she had before she needed votes. I don't think you'll ever have to worry about super left Hillary.

Well, except for with healthcare. She's supported "free" healthcare for all for a long time. I'm fine with that. She's now attached to Obamacare, but I think that's just to keep Obama's supporters. It's a typical political move and I'm okay with that. I wince every time she brings up sexism and panders to BLM, but Bernie's just as bad, maybe worse.

 

[Spartanmack]

God damn it. I hate when I have to agree with you.

Freedom of speech protects us from the government and prosecution. That's all. It's really not that difficult to understand. It doesn't protect you from criticism. It doesn't protect you from being removed from a private event for expressing your opinion. And inciting violence isn't a violation of the first amendment, but it is illegal. Trump has been very loose with his words and I'll be shocked if somebody doesn't go after him for it.

Honestly, I hate this election year. It's the election of far left vs. far right. Shit flinging morons against SJW's. I'm stuck in the middle-left and have seen my moderate candidate (hillary) move more left on racial, feminist, and economic issues. As of now, she's still my pick, but only by default.

This is a clown show. I'm over it.

This is the worst election of my lifetime. Right now it's the far left against Trump, who is not far right by any stretch of the imagination. Trump is not a conservative. He's certainly not what his republican supporters think he is and I don't think he is what his detractors on the left think he is either. He has them all fooled. I'm still hoping Cruz or even Kasich will end up with the nomination - we'll see.

 

[byco42]

Hillary Clinton is the most disingenuous person who has ever run for president. She lacks integrity, honesty, accountability, ethics or morals. Her end game is power and money at the expense of ... us. She is the poster child for everything the Democratic party claims to oppose--power, influence, income inequality, greed and all the rest. Her resume is prima facie proof of her restless, boundless ambition. Yet she's going to be the nominee and the president in 8 months.

 

[Michchamp]

hahah, yeah I saw that gif. it's awesome.

i've tried to find out the source of the images, but havent been able to. did someone actually rush trump at a campaign rally?

 

[Michchamp]

Hillary Clinton is the most disingenuous person who has ever run for president. She lacks integrity, honesty, accountability, ethics or morals. Her end game is power and money at the expense of ... us. She is the poster child for everything the Democratic party claims to oppose--power, influence, income inequality, greed and all the rest. Her resume is prima facie proof of her restless, boundless ambition. Yet she's going to be the nominee and the president in 8 months.

not if my main man, Bernard S. can stop her.

 

[Spartanmack]

This is pretty funny. And while I can't stand Trump, I have to give him credit for not bitching out - after his initial startled reaction, he kinda went at whoever it was that surprised him.

 

[TheVictors]

Hillary Clinton is the most disingenuous person who has ever run for president. She lacks integrity, honesty, accountability, ethics or morals. Her end game is power and money at the expense of ... us. She is the poster child for everything the Democratic party claims to oppose--power, influence, income inequality, greed and all the rest. Her resume is prima facie proof of her restless, boundless ambition. Yet she's going to be the nominee and the president in 8 months.

Sounds like the description of a ruthless Capitalist or aggressive, take no prisoners CEO...

 

[Spartanmack]

Sounds like the description of a ruthless Capitalist or aggressive, take no prisoners CEO...

Point of clarification - she is a corporatist, not a capitalist. There is a massive difference - one that seems to be lost on michtard and his ilk.

 

[TheVictors]

Point of clarification - she is a corporatist, not a capitalist. There is a massive difference - one that seems to be lost on michtard and his ilk.

She sounds like a ruthless business leader by that description

 

[Monster]

This is the worst election of my lifetime. Right now it's the far left against Trump, who is not far right by any stretch of the imagination. Trump is not a conservative. He's certainly not what his republican supporters think he is and I don't think he is what his detractors on the left think he is either. He has them all fooled. I'm still hoping Cruz or even Kasich will end up with the nomination - we'll see.

I would prefer Trump over Cruz any day. Cruz is way too religiously motivated. His father is terrifying.

 

[Spartanmack]

LOL...looks like the KKK is going back to the party of racists. I'm sure michtard will quietly welcome them with open arms.

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles...-quigg-endorses-hillary-clinton-for-president

What's the over/under on the number of times the media asks Hillary to repudiate this endorsement? I put it at 1 and I'm taking the under...

 

[Michchamp]

LOL...looks like the KKK is going back to the party of racists. I'm sure michtard will quietly welcome them with open arms.

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles...-quigg-endorses-hillary-clinton-for-president

What's the over/under on the number of times the media asks Hillary to repudiate this endorsement? I put it at 1 and I'm taking the under...

He previously endorsed Trump and in an odd tweet claims to support Billary because of her "secret agenda."

highly suspect. I think I'll wait to see if this is all confirmed and WTF he means before Billary should even deign to acknowledge it by disavowing the endorsement. BTW this (assuming the guy behind the twitter account is who he claims to be) is a lot different than David Duke's endorsement of Trump, which was unambiguously racist and should have been unambiguously disavowed by Trump.

until this is confirmed, chalk it up to you learning a lesson that anyone can create a twitter account and tweet anything.
social media & public relations 101.

also, you do understand that demanding Billary - who has not pandered to racism and made openly racist statements while campaigning - disavow a tweet from the kkk is different than demanding the same from Trump, who HAS done those things.

 

[Spartanmack]

He previously endorsed Trump and in an odd tweet claims to support Billary because of her "secret agenda."

highly suspect. I think I'll wait to see if this is all confirmed and WTF he means before Billary should even deign to acknowledge it by disavowing the endorsement. BTW this (assuming the guy behind the twitter account is who he claims to be) is a lot different than David Duke's endorsement of Trump, which was unambiguously racist and should have been unambiguously disavowed by Trump.

until this is confirmed, chalk it up to you learning a lesson that anyone can create a twitter account and tweet anything.
social media & public relations 101.

also, you do understand that demanding Billary - who has not pandered to racism and made openly racist statements while campaigning - disavow a tweet from the kkk is different than demanding the same from Trump, who HAS done those things.

No, it's not different. You don't get to accuse Trump of being racist without actual proof, like you do everyone else who doesn't believe what you believe. Making hawkish comments about border security and cracking down on illegal immigration is not a dog whistle for white supremacy, it's enforcing the law of the land. The burden of proof is on you not them, so they are not held to a different standard when some racist douchebag endorses them - if you demand that Trump denounce Duke, Hillary and anyone else running for the same office has to be held to the same standard. Have you seen the Jake Tapper interview? Here's the great "gotcha moment" on video...

http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/28/politics/donald-trump-white-supremacists/

"I have to look at the group. I don't know what group you're talking about. you wouldn't want me to condemn a group I knew nothing about." Maybe he is familiar with groups like the Southern Poverty Law Center naming any organization right of the far left a hate group. Clearly, he doesn't know Tapper is talking about the KKK (he later claimed he couldn't hear Tapper clearly because of a bad earpiece), which apparently, Duke is no longer even a member of so he's not being endorsed by the KKK but, as noted above, Hillary is.

Jake Tapper knows he would repudiate Duke if he knew who he was. The only reason Jake Tapper brought it up was so he could make his audience hear Donald Trump and David Duke's name in the same sentence. I don't like Trump but not because you and and other idiots like Janeane Garafolo say he's a racist, because you and other idiots like Janeane Garafolo say everyone who disagrees with you is a racist.

Edit: and after Trump looked into Duke's background, he unequivocally renounced him - of course he had to do it about 5 times so the Jake Tappers of the world could again have their audience here Trump's name in the same sentence with David Duke's.

 

[Spartanmack]

So, as it turns out, it wasn't the Trump supporters who were the violent thugs in Chicago and it wasn't the police either. From Second City Cop, an anonymous blog of a Chicago Cop who was working the area at them time:

Free Speech looks pretty bloody to the thin blue line:

The media is downplaying the "protests" as isolated. It seems they aren't broadcasting footage of the debris being thrown across Harrison by Sanders/Hillary supporters at Trump fans.

They also aren't mentioning the hordes running through the UIC parking structure breaking the windows of cars with Trump 2016 stickers.

We haven't seen any mention of the Eisenhower takeover, nor the Incident Team call-outs from assorted Districts.

It's almost like they're ashamed that the UIC tradition of supporting leftist terrorists (Ayers and his spawn) has come home to roost.

Last report was at least two cops needed numerous stitches to close up wounds. A speedy recovery to the injured.

 

[Michchamp]

you think I'm going out on a limb here for calling Trump's statements racist? Well, of course you do because, well, you know...

and yeah, the CPD has really shown themselves to be a trustworthy source on race, police conduct and well, pretty much everything else, so I'm sure you can trust their anonymous blog.

jesus h. christ...

 

[Spartanmack]

you think I'm going out on a limb here for calling Trump's statements racist? Well, of course you do because, well, you know...

and yeah, the CPD has really shown themselves to be a trustworthy source on race, police conduct and well, pretty much everything else, so I'm sure you can trust their anonymous blog.

jesus h. christ...

Here's what I know...I know you don't think it's going out on a limb because to you everything you disagree with is a dog whistle, or code for racist, white supremacy. I know you think, without any actual evidence, the CPD, Baltimore, Detroit, LA and literally every police force in every major city is racist. And yes, I know, you are the only actual racist who posts here.