thewolverines24
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2011
- Messages
- 16,792
It's not just the guy inbounding the ball. No one is actually getting open off the sets either.
Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!
By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!
-
If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.
Um vs NU
- Thread starter gobluebigjon
- Start date
Yeah just thinking about someone who's taller and can see over other guys. I wouldn't mind see Irvin or MAAR be the inbounder as long as they know what to look for.
I think Michigan makes it WAY harder to inbound than it needs to be. I coached rec ball for awhile, and we went up against teams that were tons more athletic than us. You have to space the floor out to spread the defenders, and have constant motion. As long as you can have a couple of guys get their back to the defender and make themselves available, you can get the ball in play. Michigan's go to play is to clump everyone together.
I think Michigan makes it WAY harder to inbound than it needs to be. I coached rec ball for awhile, and we went up against teams that were tons more athletic than us. You have to space the floor out to spread the defenders, and have constant motion. As long as you can have a couple of guys get their back to the defender and make themselves available, you can get the ball in play. Michigan's go to play is to clump everyone together.
Last edited:
That's what I was going to say, it's more about the scheme and execution of the scheme. The lack of intensity in their cuts was pretty pathetic.
Affiliates
