where did I post that it was ok for Israel to do that? not once did I say that it was acceptable for Israel to partake in settlements, whether as a national goal or as small religious entities doing it (which is not any better/different than terrorists doing their actions while the nation of Palestine publicly states it is wrong - not that they do - and privately funding/supplying those groups...those two things are equivalent, yes).
then there is the truth of what I was saying, that Palestine (or more likely the "terrorists" acting on Palestine's behalf) would use NUKES to wipe Israel off the map based on their ideology, public statements, government stated goals, and terrorist stated goals. they want to wipe Israel off the map...and they do not care if they die doing it based on countless suicide bombings.
So yes, it would be worse...or are you going to somehow claim that the use of nukes is not worse? whether as a military bomb/missile or as a terrorist dirty bomb...please enlighten me how that action is equal to or better than what Israel is currently doing. you cannot defend the idea that it would be ok for either side to use nukes in any fashion where the purpose is killing. or maybe in your racist jew hating opinion, nukes are the only thing to use against Israel.
