What's with "Me Tarzan, you Jane", George of the Jungle rhetoric?
Oh I get it, you are imitating Trump. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, or didn't your mom ever tell you that?
But mockery or parody isn't.
By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!
Get StartedWhat's with "Me Tarzan, you Jane", George of the Jungle rhetoric?
Oh I get it, you are imitating Trump. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, or didn't your mom ever tell you that?
As a young adult, Roosevelt showed particular interest in zoology and biology, which would serve him well later as a rancher and outdoorsman.
While a student at Harvard, Roosevelt competed in boxing, rowing, and wrestling. Academically, he studied German, natural history, forensics, and composition. He would later graduate near the top of his class. He would enjoy physical outdoor pursuits throughout his life, and often spent time hiking, riding horses, and swimming.
Teddy sure doesn't seem to be very much like Trump, (other than winning the birth lotto) who received several draft deferments to avoid serving in the military b/c of bone spurs.
https://www.newsmax.com/fastfeature...bout-theodore-roosevelt/2014/10/19/id/601451/
and again. This could quickly devolve into a libtard "Knights Who Say Ni" sketch.
There should never be any internet disagreement that could not be assuaged by Monty Python.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIV4poUZAQo
Without Monty Python, western civilization would have devolved into anarchy centuries ago.
don't be the guy who comes in and asks people to explain why a joke is funny.
But mockery or parody isn't.
Well, just about every definition of parody and mockery has the word "imitation" in it. It is either imitation or it isn't.
My comment didn't offer a negative or positive nuance to imitation.
be your M
So duhhh, imitation, mockery, and parody are the sincerest forms of flattery.
That better for you?
You want to argue semantics with me, you better bring more than your high-school education. (BTW, I don't give a crap how much schooling you actually had, I was just extending the "mockery" to you).
Of course you did, since sniping in threads seems to be your modus operandi here.
Of course you did, since sniping in threads seems to be your modus operandi here.
BTW, changing someone's quote when it is right above your post is usually considered bad form.
I'm just sayin'
. . . and yours isn't? Give me a break.
Its "aren't" not isn't.
I haven't read many if any OPs from you in DJ or on any team boards, for that matter.
You have authored all of 3 topics since '14, out of a grand total of 29 since becoming registered.
http://www.detroitsportsforum.com/search.php?searchid=284071
Become a mod, then you can officially chide us mere minions on decorum here on DSF. IIRC there is a spot open from '12 when a mod niced bestisbest abruptly ceased posting.
http://www.detroitsportsforum.com/member.php?u=468
http://www.detroitsportsforum.com/showthread.php?p=159525#post159525
I can say whatever the hell I want on decorum whether being a mod or not. Get over yourself. That fact that you are thinking I actually meant that about bad form as opposed to being a joke, says wonders about you.
dang, KRAWDUP, why are you so mad? take a chill pill.
dang, KRAWDUP, why are you so mad? take a chill pill.
Semantics is not grammar. Grammar police are normally ridiculous trolls. Semantics has to do with word usage and meanings. I'd say you need to stay with being a grammar troll, as semantics are definitely not your ken.
FYI - your Latin translation may be a bit off. I understand you think the ending is singular (us) vs. plural (i), but you might be interested in this.
The plural is modi operandi. The word operandi is a gerund in the genitive case, "of operating"; gerunds can never be pluralised in Latin, as opposed to gerundives. When a noun with an attribute in the genitive is pluralised, only the head noun normally changes, just as in English with "of": "a fact of life, two facts of life".
Lastly,
What the fuck does the original authoring of topics have to do with anything? You accused me of sniping in threads, when you are constantly doing it. Just because you start a bunch of stupid threads doesn't mean you aren't an asshole in some threads too.
You want to keep this up, or have you had enough?
It is "speaks volumes", not says wonders.
You asserted that I constantly snipe threads, which is only partly true, since I do so as often as anyone else who posts here with near daily regularity. The plural Modi is not used in the case when the exact same tactic is being used repeatedly.
Founded in 2011, Detroit Sports Forum is a community of fanatics dedicated to teams like the Lions, Tigers, Pistons, Red Wings, Wolverines, and more. We live and breathe Detroit sports!