WikiLeaks revealing how scummy the DNC is

[sggatecl]

Btw
No I wouldnt post it. That's a job for someone else . I posted leaks about everyone with the Panama paper Fiasco but have never once posted anything on gop leaks and never will because it's irrelevant to why I won't vote for Trump.

I said I would, just as I posted these. I don't have an allegiance to either party, if I smell bullshit I like to warn others before they step in it.

 

[sggatecl]

And they are pushing a conspiracy thoery that the Russians are behind it, When did they stop mocking conspiracy theories?

It's hilarious. As if the source of the leaks some how makes the leaks themselves not a big deal.

 

[Spartanmack]

It's hilarious. As if the source of the leaks some how makes the leaks themselves not a big deal.

They're trying to plant seeds of doubt as to the authenticity of the emails. It's both hilarious and sad (sadder still that some idiots will probably fall for it). According to wikileaks it's an old Dem tactic as apparently they tried to blame some other leak on a Mossad conspiracy. Republicans must be pretty badass if they have both Mossad and the Russians doing their bidding for them!!!

 

[tigermud]

There is absolutly no love for debbie wasserman schultz even on cnn tonight, even the angry bitter anti trump gal has nothing nice to say about her

 

[sggatecl]

There is absolutly no love for debbie wasserman schultz even on cnn tonight, even the angry bitter anti trump gal has nothing nice to say about her

Scapegoat.

 

[Spartanmack]

The best part maybe Clinton's denial that she knew anything about it. How many scandals does she have to be the center of or done in her name before people realize there's no way she could be innocent in all of them, let alone not be the puppet master pulling the strings? People are so freakin stupid.

 

[byco42]

"In truth, to anyone versed in counterintelligence and Russian espionage tradecraft, Wikileaks has been an obvious Kremlin front for years, and it’s nice to see the Democrats and their allies in the mainstream media suddenly come around to this view—which I’ve stated publicly since 2013, based on my long experience working against Russian security agencies in the SpyWar."

Source: John Schlinder. Scoff at will. I won't. And the end-game is to get Trump in the WH.

Edit: "John Schindler is a security expert and former National Security Agency analyst and counterintelligence officer. A specialist in espionage and terrorism, he’s also been a Navy officer and a War College professor."

 

[Michchamp]

The best part maybe Clinton's denial that she knew anything about it. How many scandals does she have to be the center of or done in her name before people realize there's no way she could be innocent in all of them, let alone not be the puppet master pulling the strings? People are so freakin stupid.

how many scandals has she been part of?

there's the email thing, and BHENGHAZI!!!.

I mean she's just generally sleazy and close to wall street, opposes efforts to regulate them, charge them with fraud, is a pro-war hawk on defense spending, the middle east, israel, etc. I would think you would like all those things though. other than her tepid support for healthcare reform and gay marriage, I don't understand why Republicans hate her so much.

or when you refer to Clinton scandals, are you going "retro" and including whitewater, Vincent Foster and other 90's era right-wing bogeyman stories?

 

[Michchamp]

Scapegoat.

...]

I dont think there ever really was love for her; she was just a cog in the political machine.

but yeah, definitely a scapegoat.

Clinton is shrewd enough to skate through this with plausible deniability she knew anything. she didn't need to... she had been cutting backroom deals for years to lay the groundwork for this.

operators with deep organizations always make sure they have a fallguy/gal who can take the fall and be branded a "rogue operator" when shit hits the fan.

None of the revelations here should be surprising to any Sanders supporter who was paying attention. we all knew shit like this was going on. not defending it; it sucks. and it sucks more the only alternative is Donald fucking Trump. so... I'm going to hold my nose and vote for Hillary. I think Sanders supporters need to stay engaged and keep pushing the DNC left. it's a marathon, not a sprint, and it doesn't end in November.

to Sanders' and those leading his campaign's credit, they knew this, and at the campaign events i went to, all his reps stressed the "long game" here knowing the old man didn't have a great shot, but the ideals he pressed for are just what this country needs.

 

[tinselwolverine]

how many scandals has she been part of?

there's the email thing, and BHENGHAZI!!!.


or when you refer to Clinton scandals, are you going "retro" and including whitewater, Vincent Foster and other 90's era right-wing bogeyman stories?

I say these things count.

 

[byco42]

I did not realize there was a statute of limitations on cronyism and corruption that has a continuous timeline of 30+ years. With EVERY one of them being dismissed and excused away by this amoral, ambitious, arrogant individual.

 

[Michchamp]

I did not realize there was a statute of limitations on cronyism and corruption that has a continuous timeline of 30+ years. With EVERY one of them being dismissed and excused away by this amoral, ambitious, arrogant individual.

i think if after spending weeks, months, or in some cases YEARS (and millions of dollars) you still can't uncover more than the appearance of impropriety, or a breach of a government information policy... it's time to let it go.

the Clintons have done some awful things, but these make-believe scandals are not among them.

 

[byco42]

i think if after spending weeks, months, or in some cases YEARS (and millions of dollars) you still can't uncover more than the appearance of impropriety, or a breach of a government information policy... it's time to let it go.

the Clintons have done some awful things, but these make-believe scandals are not among them.

When evidence vanishes and obfuscation is the response, combined with pretentious outrage and you are a sitting president and first lady, well, anything can be "whitewashed."

 

[tinselwolverine]

i think if after spending weeks, months, or in some cases YEARS (and millions of dollars) you still can't uncover more than the appearance of impropriety, or a breach of a government information policy... it's time to let it go.

the Clintons have done some awful things, but these make-believe scandals are not among them.

There's been more than the appearance of impropriety.

The McDougals went to jail for white water, and Bill Clinton was sanctioned by the department of justice for his perjury, and in the process he ruined a perfectly good article of clothing.

Not that Nixon and Reagan and Bush and Bush didn't also skate on shit that the rest of us would be locked up for.

 

[Gulo Blue]

i think if after spending weeks, months, or in some cases YEARS (and millions of dollars) you still can't uncover more than the appearance of impropriety, or a breach of a government information policy... it's time to let it go.

Legally, sure. But what do you really think about Michael Jackson?

 

[Michchamp]

"In truth, to anyone versed in counterintelligence and Russian espionage tradecraft, Wikileaks has been an obvious Kremlin front for years, and it?s nice to see the Democrats and their allies in the mainstream media suddenly come around to this view?which I?ve stated publicly since 2013, based on my long experience working against Russian security agencies in the SpyWar."

Source: John Schlinder. Scoff at will. I won't. And the end-game is to get Trump in the WH.

Edit: "John Schindler is a security expert and former National Security Agency analyst and counterintelligence officer. A specialist in espionage and terrorism, he?s also been a Navy officer and a War College professor."

wikileaks has dumped a lot of stuff about Putin & his allies over the years.

the fact that the source of a leak might come from a Russian hack, and is intentionally given to wikileaks doesn't mean much.

its always better for the victim of the leak (the leakee?) to point fingers at the leaker, rather than the content of the docs leaked

 

[byco42]

wikileaks has dumped a lot of stuff about Putin & his allies over the years.

the fact that the source of a leak might come from a Russian hack, and is intentionally given to wikileaks doesn't mean much.

its always better for the victim of the leak (the leakee?) to point fingers at the leaker, rather than the content of the docs leaked

I wonder if you read the link itself.

 

[KAWDUP]

. . . on the flip side nothing will stop the goose stepping Trump supporters from clicking thier boots . . .

Excuse the quote out of context, but are you really comparing all Trump supporters to Nazi's?

. . . and you wonder why I accuse you of hate mongering yourself.

<<shakes head>>

 

[Sbee]

how many scandals has she been part of?

there's the email thing, and BHENGHAZI!!!.

I mean she's just generally sleazy and close to wall street, opposes efforts to regulate them, charge them with fraud, is a pro-war hawk on defense spending, the middle east, israel, etc. I would think you would like all those things though. other than her tepid support for healthcare reform and gay marriage, I don't understand why Republicans hate her so much.

or when you refer to Clinton scandals, are you going "retro" and including whitewater, Vincent Foster and other 90's era right-wing bogeyman stories?

She's been in the crosshairs of the RNC since 1992, it's actually surprising how few real scandals she's been involved in. Benghazi was all about the failures of Obama, until he won re-election, then it became all about Hillary, just goes to show that it was all about the election cycle anyway. the email thing, whatever, the FBI said that it was nothing criminal, though if you watched the convention last week you'd think she's going to be indicted tomorrow.

 

[KAWDUP]

She's been in the crosshairs of the RNC since 1992, it's actually surprising how few real scandals she's been involved in. Benghazi was all about the failures of Obama, until he won re-election, then it became all about Hillary, just goes to show that it was all about the election cycle anyway. the email thing, whatever, the FBI said that it was nothing criminal, though if you watched the convention last week you'd think she's going to be indicted tomorrow.

yeah, but was it "grossly negligent"?