wouldn't you have to compare nations to develop the opinion that the US is the most corrupt?
His article's title was very poorly worded, but I don't disagree with its content.
He makes the point that the US economy is so vast, that any corruption here dwarfs corruption elsewhere.
Like I think about a story about Ukraine my wife told me. at her university, some professors would openly hint they required bribes from students around exam periods. These were not usually expensive (by American standards), but the average Ukrainian college student couldn't afford them.
And other things, from getting a dorm room to getting admitted period were all open for sale... a few thousand dollars here or there.
Students that couldn't afford the bribes could still get in, and pass exams, but their professors made it a lot harder on them. in one case my wife told me her professor, upset that my wife didn't bring her "a gift" made her go through an additional round of exams, after other kids were done.
Initially when I'd hear these stories, I'd think "Wow! that's corrupt."
But I think about stories like the one in the stickied thread on this board (The Other Affirmative Action) about how Kushner's dad paid Harvard a couple million to get him in.
So the US is corrupt to, it's just that the dollar amounts are higher... a lot higher. Paying bribes - let's not mince words here - is an option only available to people with the means and the right connections.
I'm starting to think that a politics sub forum may not have been the best choice of action. There's rarely any good conversation without people calling each other names. It's not worth it.
you can ignore the name calling and just read the links or posts. I've learned from links others have posted.
I don't always respond to the insults and name calling; gotta remind yourself of the adage about wrestling in the mud with pigs. and there's no shame in ignoring someone's bullshit post that makes disengenuous arguments or insults... I think most people here know who is who.