hockeywings
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2011
- Messages
- 177
I don't think he has to demonize his opponents at all. They do a pretty good job at that themselves. Child laborers.... corporations are people.......
By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!
Get Startedtsmith7559 said:[color=#FF6103 said:Monster [/color]]Obama hasn't even started his campaign blitz. Chill out a bit, the polls don't mean anything right now. If it's that way in August, then yeah, he's fucked.
LOL, whats he running on??? He has started his campaign, its called OWS, his plan is to make 1% the bogeyman, blame them for all his faults. Monster, he has nothing to run on. Matthews even acknowledges this. Whats his slogan..."It couldn't have been worse". "Unemployment would have been 17% instead of the 14% it really is."
His campaign is to demonize his opponent and he will have a lot of money to do so, it wont be much on his accomplishments.
mhughes0021 said:Write a list for g dubs and then lets compare notes and see who the failure is?
His economy collapsed the banks and the auto industry.
He started and didnt finish any wars.
His war on terror killed no important terrorist whike spending billions of dollars a day we didnt have.
Womd my ass
His national security failed so bad we got bombed by our own planes while he sat there reading childrens books.
He created 0 jobs in 8 years.
tsmith7559 said:mhughes0021 said:Write a list for g dubs and then lets compare notes and see who the failure is?
His economy collapsed the banks and the auto industry.
He started and didnt finish any wars.
His war on terror killed no important terrorist whike spending billions of dollars a day we didnt have.
Womd my ass
His national security failed so bad we got bombed by our own planes while he sat there reading childrens books.
He created 0 jobs in 8 years.
Is GWB running for president? I could argue his presidency vs Obama, but whats the point. He's retired. I do know the country has been in a much better condition when republicans control the congress
tsmith7559 said:[color=#FF6103 said:Monster [/color]]Obama hasn't even started his campaign blitz. Chill out a bit, the polls don't mean anything right now. If it's that way in August, then yeah, he's fucked.
LOL, whats he running on??? He has started his campaign, its called OWS, his plan is to make 1% the bogeyman, blame them for all his faults. Monster, he has nothing to run on. Matthews even acknowledges this. Whats his slogan..."It couldn't have been worse". "Unemployment would have been 17% instead of the 14% it really is."
His campaign is to demonize his opponent and he will have a lot of money to do so, it wont be much on his accomplishments.
tsmith7559 said:mhughes0021 said:Write a list for g dubs and then lets compare notes and see who the failure is?
His economy collapsed the banks and the auto industry.
He started and didnt finish any wars.
His war on terror killed no important terrorist whike spending billions of dollars a day we didnt have.
Womd my ass
His national security failed so bad we got bombed by our own planes while he sat there reading childrens books.
He created 0 jobs in 8 years.
Is GWB running for president? I could argue his presidency vs Obama, but whats the point. He's retired. I do know the country has been in a much better condition when republicans control the congress
[color=#006400 said:biggunsbob[/color]]
tsmith7559 said:LOL, whats he running on??? He has started his campaign, its called OWS, his plan is to make 1% the bogeyman, blame them for all his faults. Monster, he has nothing to run on. Matthews even acknowledges this. Whats his slogan..."It couldn't have been worse". "Unemployment would have been 17% instead of the 14% it really is."
His campaign is to demonize his opponent and he will have a lot of money to do so, it wont be much on his accomplishments.
Did you say Demonize with a straight face.. Holy crap that is the republican play book to a T.. Fuck all republicans and their elitist walls. They don't want to help Americans.. They want everyone at each other throats.. The Republicans are the party of No.. Always have been always will. The more you write your bullshit on these boards more i hate the republican party with a passion.. .. Fuck all republican politicians..
[color=#006400 said:biggunsbob[/color]]
tsmith7559 said:Is GWB running for president? I could argue his presidency vs Obama, but whats the point. He's retired. I do know the country has been in a much better condition when republicans control the congress
Perpetual war and fuck the middle class and poor people.. Yup that is the republican playbook in a nutshell..
tsmith7559 said:[color=#006400 said:biggunsbob[/color]]
Perpetual war and fuck the middle class and poor people.. Yup that is the republican playbook in a nutshell..
Republicans believe in individual liberty and freedom, limited government, just like the constitution calls for........ Dems, What constitution???
hockeywings said:tsmith7559 said:Republicans believe in individual liberty and freedom, limited government, just like the constitution calls for........ Dems, What constitution???
I would like to ask for evidence that republicans are for individual liberty, freedom and limited government. For the past 30 years, they have been against all three of those things between a 300 percent increase in government spending under Reagan to the Patriot act under Bush. It has been bigger government spending for republicans and less individual liberty and freedom.
tsmith7559 said:hockeywings said:I would like to ask for evidence that republicans are for individual liberty, freedom and limited government. For the past 30 years, they have been against all three of those things between a 300 percent increase in government spending under Reagan to the Patriot act under Bush. It has been bigger government spending for republicans and less individual liberty and freedom.
Dems controlled congress under Reagan. They controlled the purse strings.
Reagan plan
(1) reduce the growth of government spending,
(2) reduce the marginal tax rates on income from both labor and capital,
(3) reduce regulation, and
(4) reduce inflation by controlling the growth of the money supply.
Reagan wanted defense spending increased and Tip O'Neill wanted spending.....
tsmith7559 said:hockeywings said:I would like to ask for evidence that republicans are for individual liberty, freedom and limited government. For the past 30 years, they have been against all three of those things between a 300 percent increase in government spending under Reagan to the Patriot act under Bush. It has been bigger government spending for republicans and less individual liberty and freedom.
Dems controlled congress under Reagan. They controlled the purse strings.
Reagan plan
(1) reduce the growth of government spending,
(2) reduce the marginal tax rates on income from both labor and capital,
(3) reduce regulation, and
(4) reduce inflation by controlling the growth of the money supply.
Reagan wanted defense spending increased and Tip O'Neill wanted spending.....
blah blah blah...all the shit bush did doesnt fix itself. Have to spend to get the ship righted after 8 years of lunacy. Were really lucky the republicans dudnt fuck it up any worse...it was close to being insurmountable.tsmith7559 said:do you understand congress spends the money? Reagan cut the individual tax rates and doubled revenues to the government, as your chart so elegantly points out. The fucking Dem congress spent it like drunken sailors, just like Reid & Pelosi did starting in 2007.
Only Republican congresses have controlled/balanced the budgets throughout our history
Founded in 2011, Detroit Sports Forum is a community of fanatics dedicated to teams like the Lions, Tigers, Pistons, Red Wings, Wolverines, and more. We live and breathe Detroit sports!