Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Apparently the Calvin Johnson rule only affects Calvin Johnson

cheeno

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 4, 2011
Messages
9,194
Don't know if you guys are watching the Cincy game but I couldn't tell the difference between the two scenarios.
 
I just posted the same thing. So Gresham's forward progress was stopped so it's a catch but CJ catches it in the end zone (forward progress should be over immediately) and it's no catch.
 
I just posted the same thing. So Gresham's forward progress was stopped so it's a catch but CJ catches it in the end zone (forward progress should be over immediately) and it's no catch.

I don't even know anymore. How could forward progress not be stopped in the end zone. Just bogus.
 
Complete bullshit. My jaw dropped when the ref said forward progress.
 
Both announcers thought it was no catch as well. I hate the nfl.
 
It was really the exact same play...except you could argue Calvin's was more of a catch because he was actually getting up to celebrate his catch when the ball came loose and Gresham used the ball to brace his fall.

BTW I think both should actually be catches for sure. This complete the process stuff is ridiculous in both situations. But if Calvin's was NOT a catch then Gresham's should NOT be a catch either.
 
Comes down to the feet and when contact was made. The Gresham catch his feet hit before he is contacted then he is taken to the ground. The calvin catch he is contacted in the air then goes to the ground. That is why the calls were different.
 
Yes, you don't care but others apparently do.

You don't care about CJ getting screwed two years ago or you wouldn't have posted they were different and the reason why. You would have just posted "complete bullshit" et el.
 
You don't care about CJ getting screwed two years ago or you wouldn't have posted they were different and the reason why. You would have just posted "complete bullshit" et el.

I care about the call that just happened. The CJ one was 2 years ago, I'm over it.
 
I care about the call that just happened. The CJ one was 2 years ago, I'm over it.

That's what my post was about, why anyone is still bothered by the CJ one. I thought I was clear, guess not.
 
Back
Top