Confused by this list, where's Matt?

[Mitchrapp]

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/page/NFLRANK2015/top-100-players

 

[brewer229]

Matt Forte is #59
Matt Ryan is #69

Can't think of any others that would be even considered on the list.

 

[Mitchrapp]

Please help. I'm looking for Matt, he's suppose to be on this list. Where is he?

 

[LKP]

He's on the grantland list.

 

[Mitchrapp]

He's on the grantland list.

"I began my effort to improve on the Top 100 list compiled by NFL players by starting a list of my own."

That tells me all I need to know about the Grantland list.

 

[brewer229]

He's on the grantland list.

as the 14th best QB.

 

[inkfreq]

It's a list of the 50 best, including defensive players.

50 guys, 32 teams, each team should have roughly 1.5 players on the list, meaning some will have two, some will have one, and some will have none.

So what if a QB didn't make the top 50 in an op-ed piece. He doesn't deserve to be top 50.

 

[brewer229]

It's a list of the 50 best, including defensive players.

50 guys, 32 teams, each team should have roughly 1.5 players on the list, meaning some will have two, some will have one, and some will have none.

So what if a QB didn't make the top 50 in an op-ed piece. He doesn't deserve to be top 50.

Its top 100.

 

[brewer229]

here is page 2 (51-100)

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/page/NFLRank2015No51-100/top-100-players-51-100

 

[tomdalton22]

I saw 2 guys on the list that I wanted to draft in 2014 (Donald & Martin) but didn't see the matchup nightmare.

Also, Suh ranked #4 and Ngata at 89

On Ngata "At 31, the question now is whether Ngata has truly hit the "regression" stage of a brilliant career. Last season was the first time since 2008 that he wasn't selected to the Pro Bowl. Being suspended four games for PEDs certainly didn't help his case, but his play had dipped prior to the ban. The Ravens traded Ngata to Detroit for a pair of late-round draft picks to help plug the gap left by the departed Ndamukong Suh. "If you don't ask him to play every down, you're going to see that outstanding player," said one panelist. "Just don't pretend this is 2009."

 

[Mitchrapp]

It's a list of the 50 best, including defensive players.

50 guys, 32 teams, each team should have roughly 1.5 players on the list, meaning some will have two, some will have one, and some will have none.

So what if a QB didn't make the top 50 in an op-ed piece. He doesn't deserve to be top 50.

100 dude.. try hitting the next button.

But you're wrong. He should be top ten. I looked for several minutes and didn't see Matt there.. Where is he?

 

[sggatecl]

I'm going to start off by saying this list is a pretty large pile of dog shit. I will follow that statement by also saying it has nothing to do with Stafford's absence from the list.

Reasons (and not all of them) that this list is dog shit:

** Levy and Ngata tied at 89. So you're telling me that one of the top 5 ILB in his prime is the same as a NT/DT on the wrong side of 30 that has been popped for PEDs? Fuck off. Either Ngata shouldn't make the list or Levy should be higher.

** Khalil Mack at 53 behind Eric Weddle and Lavonte David. Levy and Mack are both as good or better than those two. Khalil Mack wasn't even properly used last season by most accounts and was still a pass rushing terror. Also, just to reiterate, Levy at 89 is fucking garbage.

** Demarco "I've had one good, healthy season" Murray is rated far too high. This list reeks of someone that overvalues offensive players. I'd take a dozen of the 51-100 defensive players without blinking before Murray.

** More proof that this list cares about touchdowns and yards only? Maurkice Pouncey, the best center in football is at 65. You kidding me in my balls? I was going to complain about LeVeon Bell being shit on at 25 but this is far more egregious.

I could keep going on but ESPN is shit and not worth my time. Carry on gentlemen.

 

[Mitchrapp]

I'm going to start off by saying this list is a pretty large pile of dog shit. I will follow that statement by also saying it has nothing to do with Stafford's absence from the list.

Reasons (and not all of them) that this list is dog shit:

** Levy and Ngata tied at 89. So you're telling me that one of the top 5 ILB in his prime is the same as a NT/DT on the wrong side of 30 that has been popped for PEDs? Fuck off. Either Ngata shouldn't make the list or Levy should be higher.

** Khalil Mack at 53 behind Eric Weddle and Lavonte David. Levy and Mack are both as good or better than those two. Khalil Mack wasn't even properly used last season by most accounts and was still a pass rushing terror. Also, just to reiterate, Levy at 89 is fucking garbage.

** Demarco "I've had one good, healthy season" Murray is rated far too high. This list reeks of someone that overvalues offensive players. I'd take a dozen of the 51-100 defensive players without blinking before Murray.

** More proof that this list cares about touchdowns and yards only? Maurkice Pouncey, the best center in football is at 65. You kidding me in my balls? I was going to complain about LeVeon Bell being shit on at 25 but this is far more egregious.

I could keep going on but ESPN is shit and not worth my time. Carry on gentlemen.

Of course it's dog shit. Nonetheless, where's Matt?

 

[sggatecl]

Of course it's dog shit. Nonetheless, where's Matt?

Eating a meal being served by his personal chef with his gorgeous wife I imagine.

 

[tonyballs]

Of course it's dog shit. Nonetheless, where's Matt?

Why do you care so much??

 

[boogerlovejoy]

Of course it's dog shit. Nonetheless, where's Matt?

Its clear you're trolling, but I'm not sure why?

That list is subjective and FULL of question marks. It serves your purpose so you use it. What point are you trying to make?

You come off as a butt hurt little girl, by the way. Instead of a real conversation, you're just trolling like a child.

 

[tonyballs]

Its clear you're trolling, but I'm not sure why?

That list is subjective and FULL of question marks. It serves your purpose so you use it. What point are you trying to make?

You come off as a butt hurt little girl, by the way. Instead of a real conversation, you're just trolling like a child.

The guy hasn't made a point in years. Top 100 list and no Stafford....who the fuck cares? Lol

 

[Mitchrapp]

Just flew right over your head.

 

[LKP]

After 2015 when Stafford has elite numbers. He will be on every top 100 list. And everyone wll have to STFU about him.

 

[jdeb]

I'm going to start off by saying this list is a pretty large pile of dog shit. I will follow that statement by also saying it has nothing to do with Stafford's absence from the list.

Reasons (and not all of them) that this list is dog shit:

** Levy and Ngata tied at 89. So you're telling me that one of the top 5 ILB in his prime is the same as a NT/DT on the wrong side of 30 that has been popped for PEDs? Fuck off. Either Ngata shouldn't make the list or Levy should be higher.

** Khalil Mack at 53 behind Eric Weddle and Lavonte David. Levy and Mack are both as good or better than those two. Khalil Mack wasn't even properly used last season by most accounts and was still a pass rushing terror. Also, just to reiterate, Levy at 89 is fucking garbage.

** Demarco "I've had one good, healthy season" Murray is rated far too high. This list reeks of someone that overvalues offensive players. I'd take a dozen of the 51-100 defensive players without blinking before Murray.

** More proof that this list cares about touchdowns and yards only? Maurkice Pouncey, the best center in football is at 65. You kidding me in my balls? I was going to complain about LeVeon Bell being shit on at 25 but this is far more egregious.

I could keep going on but ESPN is shit and not worth my time. Carry on gentlemen.

100% agree


Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk