Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Election Aftermath

Election fraud is pretty much a sport here in Southern California, and pretty much everybody in Southern California is a Democrat.

I don?t know what goes on in any other part of the country but here the Democrats do it to themselves and each other.

I'm sure it's limited to California and then only to local and state level elections.
 
yeah, they're in California, that's why I said people "like" them. No, you don't have to assume ALL democrats across the country engaged in fraud. Maybe if you were a little less dumb and understood how our elections work you'd realize you only need a few shady people in a large urban center in a swing state or two to change the outcome of an election.



I don't know, you tell me - are there any large urban centers controlled by Republicans where they could pull something like this off? Any with evidence of potential tampering like we saw in Detroit and Philadelphia?

Hard to say.

When Trump asked the Georgia Secretary of State to find him 11,780 votes, I don?t think Trump would have cared much what part of the state they would have come from.
 
Infowars host Owen Shroyer of the War Room announced during Friday?s broadcast that the US attorney?s office in Washington D.C. is charging him with illegally entering a restricted area on the Capitol grounds and disorderly conduct during the January 6th rally.

The criminal complaint, filed by the FBI Washington Field Office?s Joint Terrorism Task Force, alleges Shroyer violated a February 2020 deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) from when he was charged for interrupting a House Judiciary Committee meeting on December 9, 2019.

https://www.infowars.com/posts/brea...ully-standing-on-steps-near-capitol-building/
 
The good thing about gerrymandering is that we should all agree we want to get rid of it. If 'they' do it as much as 'we' do, then it won't even hurt you politically.
 
https://youtu.be/HSUqa8StAjE

Is Speaker Pelosi a. prescient? b. a mouthpiece? c. senile? d. all of the above?

How long before this "Section 4" of the 25th is leveled at President Biden? Probably never, since, then Vice President Harris is then sworn in, and the Senate Democrats potentially lose their tie-breaking vote, since confirmation of a new VP will be a 50-50 vote, IMO.

EDIT: And what a stickler for proper mask wearing she appears to be!
 
Last edited:
Federal judge sanctions Trump attorneys for spreading false election fraud claims
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/po...preading-false-election-fraud-claims-n1277664

I know people that still think the election was stolen. It's incredible. How badly do you have to want to believe a lie to still believe it at this point?


I think it's like the people who believe the moon landing was faked; and those that think the earth is really flat....even when presented with substantial proof otherwise, they just can't let go. It's all they have.
 
I think it's like the people who believe the moon landing was faked; and those that think the earth is really flat....even when presented with substantial proof otherwise, they just can't let go. It's all they have.

Where is the substantial proof otherwise for the election?
 
Last edited:
Federal judge sanctions Trump attorneys for spreading false election fraud claims
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/po...preading-false-election-fraud-claims-n1277664

I know people that still think the election was stolen. It's incredible. How badly do you have to want to believe a lie to still believe it at this point?

This isn?t new.

Lots of people didn?t believe that W was legitimately elected in 2000.

Lots of people believe Trump wasn?t legitimately elected in 2016.

Going back before most of our time, some questioned the legitimacy of the Kennedy election in 1960.

More quietly behind the scenes than Gore and Trump, team Nixon pursued the same sorts of legal remedies as did the other two.

This isn?t new.
 
This isn?t new.

Lots of people didn?t believe that W was legitimately elected in 2000.

Lots of people believe Trump wasn?t legitimately elected in 2016.

Going back before most of our time, some questioned the legitimacy of the Kennedy election in 1960.

More quietly behind the scenes than Gore and Trump, team Nixon pursued the same sorts of legal remedies as did the other two.

This isn?t new.

Sure, but the reasons matter. Did the Supreme Court rule correctly in Bush v Gore is a different question from were voting machines hacked or large numbers of votes added to the count not reflecting any voting that took place. Previous questions of legitimacy are all colored by the opinions of what should be legitimate, not factual matters of made up votes illicitly added to the counts.
 
I think it's like the people who believe the moon landing was faked; and those that think the earth is really flat....even when presented with substantial proof otherwise, they just can't let go. It's all they have.


WRONG! same ol' discredit attempt crap from the likes of the narrative parrots I for one will NEVER believe Joe Biden got more LEGAL votes than Obama. I also strongly believe we really did land on the MOON! and that the EARTH is NOT flat! Also potentially noteworthy, I don't believe in BIGFOOT either!

So you sir can kindly GFY for that generalization, and make sure you get your booster shot every 6 months! Have a nice day!
 
Last edited:
Sure, but the reasons matter. Did the Supreme Court rule correctly in Bush v Gore is a different question from were voting machines hacked or large numbers of votes added to the count not reflecting any voting that took place. Previous questions of legitimacy are all colored by the opinions of what should be legitimate, not factual matters of made up votes illicitly added to the counts.

Well in those other three what were ?facts? were questioned.

In the case of trump 2016, those who questioned it thought the ?facts? were that Internet bots and Russian collusion aided Trump to the victory.

In 2000, the question was what were the ?facts? regarding how often the votes should be counted, and what the rules for recounting should be.

In 1960, the ?facts? in question were the legitimacy of the votes cast, most especially in Chicago, where it was fairly highly suspected that the Daly machine had a record of making illegitimate votes appear.

It always revolves around a dispute about what are the ?fact.?
 
WRONG! same ol' discredit attempt crap from the likes of the narrative parrots I for one will NEVER believe Joe Biden got more LEGAL votes than Obam. I also strongly believe we really did land on the MOON! and that the EARTH is NOT flat! Also potentially noteworthy, I don't believe in BIGFOOT either!

So you sir can kindly GFY for that generalization, and make sure you get your booster shot every 6 months! Have a nice day!

Okay, for the record J?Biden got the exact same number of votes as Obama, not once but twice.

First in 2008, then again in 2012.
 
Back
Top