Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Hoops vs Rutgers

Well how about that ! My heart is in my throat


Johns jr Mvp of the game.
Simpson is a close second.
 
It's the stupid turnovers that get to me. Clean most of that up and the FTs and this team is at least 2 wins better at 15-6.
Oh yeah. Completely agree. Just super happy with the win. Sold a home game so we basically have to play Rutgers on the road twice. Getting this win was actually pretty big for our March resume. It's a Q1 win as long as Rutgers stays in the top 50 of the NET.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
 
Michigan makes the tournament even if the they close to .500. Say like 17-13. Or 18-13. You know what I mean. I remember a team getting as a at large a few years back at like 18-14 or something like that. Just hope we do better then that.

Teske get ready. Wesson is coming !
 
Last edited:
Even though Michigan won this game, I still believe it was dumb to schedule a home game at MSG. I know it might look cool to recruits or something, but I still don't like it.

Nice solid win by Michigan. They made a lot of mistakes, but still gutted out a tough win against a pretty good team.

Teske must be reading my posts about his 1" vertical.

IF Michigan had kept this as a home game, wouldn't it be weird that they would have 3 home games in a row?
 
Even though Michigan won this game, I still believe it was dumb to schedule a home game at MSG. I know it might look cool to recruits or something, but I still don't like it.

I have no idea how this was set up ? did Michigan have a choice?

Maybe Michigan was asked to take one for the conference?who knows?
 
I have no idea how this was set up ? did Michigan have a choice?

Maybe Michigan was asked to take one for the conference?who knows?

I guess I don't really know.

Michigan State is set to play Rutgers next year at MSG. I don't know if that is a home game for MSU or not.

I would guess that Warde Manuel OK'd it.
 

Yeah probably.

In the link Howard is all daisies and unicorns about it, but in the court side post game he said the crowd seemed more of a Rutgers crowd - maybe a little subtle jab at the conference.

But our guys won and for the most part he was pretty smiley.

There are LOT of Michigans in just about every population center in the country.

This March I?m heading to Malibu Beach to watch our baseball team.

I thought we had a little bit of the edge with the neutral crowd yesterday.

So alls well that ends well, the saying goes.
 
I guess I don't really know.

Michigan State is set to play Rutgers next year at MSG. I don't know if that is a home game for MSU or not.

I would guess that Warde Manuel OK'd it.

In exchange for agreeing to play this game, they cut a deal that Ohio State would have one (1) less phantom pass interference call go against us during next year's UM-OSU game.
 
Back
Top