How the Mueller Investigation Could Play Out for Trump

[Gulo Blue]

https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/07/politics/adam-schiff-trump-white-house-staffers/index.html

stop tweeting and do something about it trump! ya stupid ass

Release the Fisa docs for starters dummy, these assholes aren't interested in progress and peace, they are only interested in vengeance, how many times do they have to prove that before you get it!

I thought they said the Steele thing was only a small part of the FISA warrant. Not a driving factor.

 

[tigermud]

I thought they said the Steele thing was only a small part of the FISA warrant. Not a driving factor.

After that there needs to be a second SC appointed anything short of this and he will be overthrown imo and we’re back on the global tyranny chicom path leading to equally assured misery for all for sure while we currently still have an outside chance of not ending up there ultimately anyway

 

[Gulo Blue]

we?re back on the global tyranny chicom path

If you think this is the problem and Trump is the solution, why doesn't he get rid of (Obama carryover) Ajit Pai?

 

[tigermud]

If you think this is the problem and Trump is the solution, why doesn't he get rid of (Obama carryover) Ajit Pai?

I agree trump is not doing nearly enough about all the censorship, maybe he doesn't realize how bad it is since they still let him tweet, maybe if the dems weren't constantly trying to get him removed from office he'd have more room on the plate to say hey wtf Pai. idk..

https://www.apnews.com/4469104d83a543cf8fbc82610071bbc4

What would be so bad about talking about a peace deal? i don't get it.

 

[tinselwolverine]

I agree trump is not doing nearly enough about all the censorship, maybe he doesn't realize how bad it is since they still let him tweet, maybe if the dems weren't constantly trying to get him removed from office he'd have more room on the plate to say hey wtf Pai. idk..

https://www.apnews.com/4469104d83a543cf8fbc82610071bbc4

What would be so bad about talking about a peace deal? i don't get it.

He?s not doing anything about censorship for the same reason he?s not doing anything about the space aliens, Bigfoot or Nettie the abominable snow monster.

There is no constitutionally/lawfully prohibited censorship occurring.

 

[tigermud]

He’s not doing anything about censorship for the same reason he’s not doing anything about the space aliens, Bigfoot or Nettie the abominable snow monster.

There is no constitutionally/lawfully prohibited censorship occurring.

Bigfoot is not real, big tech chicom style censorship is

https://thehill.com/opinion/cyberse...rship-of-conservative-users-is-alive-and-well

 

[tinselwolverine]

Bigfoot is not real, big tech chicom style censorship is

https://thehill.com/opinion/cyberse...rship-of-conservative-users-is-alive-and-well

So what if that’s the case?-which it really isn’t.

There’s nothing in the law that forbids it.

Also I would suggest that it’s bat shit crazy that’s being censored by privately owned companies which is absolutely and utterly their right to do so.

Let’s say I have an independent ad agency. I sell ad space for a number of publications to a number of companies who want to advertise.

Let’s say one of my publications is a Judeo Christian religious oriented publication.

Let’s say one of my advertisers is a full on nude titty pole dancer bar.

So let’s say the titty bar owner wants to run an ad in the religious publication. Am I going to do that? Fuck no. Is that censorship? Fuck yes it is. Am I within my right to do that? Fuck yes I am. Am I going to take his money to run ads and publications that are more appropriate? Fuck yes I am.

I’ve stated before I don’t think you really understand what’s in the constitution and what isn’t.

The First Amendment.

Private companies are absolutely entitled to censor what they want.

Let’s say the father of a teenage daughter hears a knock on the door, and a classmate of hers- a dude-is there and says “I want to show a photograph of my penis to your daughter.”

The father says “fuck off,” in the little fucking teenage asshole says “hey-you are censoring me-that’s a violation of my first amendment rights.”

Does the father legally have to say, “yeah my bad, come on in.”

Private individual corporations or individuals are perfectly entitled to censor whatever shit they want to.

 

[tigermud]

So what if that’s the case...which it really isn’t.

It doesn’t end there though tinsel big tech is doing the the bidding of thier lefty party hate trump groups, then they go after payment processors and isp’s trying to drive them right out of internet exsistance to silence political descent and reach, under the guise of extremely loose unequally enforced so called hate speech in many cases, they are essentially treated like terriost with the aspect of the goal being to dry up thier funds put the trump supporters, out of business, trump is blind to it he will lose in 2020 if not removed from office before then, only left narratives allowed, remove right narratives from having the internet public square at all cost

Big tech 2020 election meddling in progress, we should have a SC for the 2020 election too after trump loses to investigate this big tech meddling collusion

 

[tinselwolverine]

It doesn?t end there though tinsel big tech is doing the the bidding of thier lefty party hate trump groups, then they go after payment processors and isp?s trying to drive them right out of internet exsistance to silence political descent and reach, under the guise of extremely loose unequally enforced so called hate speech in many cases, they are essentially treated like terriost with the aspect of the goal being to dry up thier funds put the trump supporters, out of business, trump is blind to it he will lose in 2020 if not removed from office before then, only left narratives allowed, remove right narratives from having the internet public square at all cost

Big tech 2020 election meddling in progress, we should have a SC for the 2020 election too after trump loses to investigate this big tech meddling collusion

I find this opinion to be hyperbolic, unsubstantiated and propagandistic.

Kind of like when a liberal says we need to stop children and old people from dying in the streets by the thousands every day, because the country doesn?t have universal healthcare.

 

[tinselwolverine]

It doesn?t end there though tinsel big tech is doing the the bidding of thier lefty party hate trump groups, then they go after payment processors and isp?s trying to drive them right out of internet exsistance to silence political descent and reach, under the guise of extremely loose unequally enforced so called hate speech in many cases, they are essentially treated like terriost with the aspect of the goal being to dry up thier funds put the trump supporters, out of business, trump is blind to it he will lose in 2020 if not removed from office before then, only left narratives allowed, remove right narratives from having the internet public square at all cost

Big tech 2020 election meddling in progress, we should have a SC for the 2020 election too after trump loses to investigate this big tech meddling collusion

I find this opinion to be hyperbolic, unsubstantiated and propagandistic.

Kind of like when a liberal says we need to stop children and old people from dying in the streets by the thousands every day, because the country doesn?t have universal healthcare.

 

[tigermud]

I find this opinion to be hyperbolic, unsubstantiated and propagandistic.

Kind of like when a liberal says we need to stop children and old people from dying in the streets by the thousands every day, because the country doesn?t have universal healthcare.

Ok then

I tend to assume the worst and hope for the best and I don?t under estimate the hate on the left, there is so much blind hate for trump out there I don?t consider it hyperbolic at all.

 

[tigermud]

More hannity meaningless bombshells schiff met with glen Simpson in aspen in July
And??? So what

 

[tigermud]

Gay frog is saying tonight the mueller probe will end March 1st and then N.Y., DC and Chicago will announce criminal indictments of trump org afterward.

Gay frog breaks down how FBI Special Counsel Robert Mueller is gearing up to end his witch hunt on March 1st, but Democrat lawmakers in their strongholds of New York, Washington D.C., and Chicago are planning to move forward with criminal indictments against President Trump regardless of Mueller’s findings.

 

[Michchamp]

if every post with the phrase "gay frog" in it were deleted, this board would be a better place. nothing informative, interesting, or true would be lost either.

 

[Thumb]

if every post with the phrase "gay frog" in it were deleted, this board would be a better place. nothing informative, interesting, or true would be lost either.

Agree 100%

It wasn't funny the first 1000 times he posted it, and it's not getting better with age.

 

[Spartanmack]

if every post from the handle "michchamp" were deleted, this board would be a better place. Nothing informative, interesting, or true would be lost either.

fify

 

[tigermud]

don't worry he'll be shut down soon enough and you can both throw a party then bask in your dystopia

 

[tigermud]

it's also not really meant to be funny as much as that being his new name. I mean it's not possible to take this guy too seriously when he does shit like hop around his studio in a pink too too frog suit. I mean the dude is mentally ill half the time.

 

[Gulo Blue]

it's also not really meant to be funny as much as that being his new name. I mean it's not possible to take this guy too seriously when he does shit like hop around his studio in a pink too too frog suit. I mean the dude is mentally ill half the time.

Instead of this guy, why not pick a better example of the threat of de-platforming? Go with a best case instead of a worst case. Who's the most truthful and sane person being de-platformed clearly because of their politics? (As opposed to being de-platformed because they're making the world a worse place with their garbage.)

 

[tigermud]

Instead of this guy, why not pick a better example of the threat of de-platforming? Go with a best case instead of a worst case. Who's the most truthful and sane person being de-platformed clearly because of their politics? (As opposed to being de-platformed because they're making the world a worse place with their garbage.)

well in case you missed the other thread, assclown boy was just the beginning.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-law-center-over-hate-group-label/2783956002/

Proud Boys founder Gavin McInnes rejects the notion he’s a hate-monger, and he’s going after an organization that believes he fits the description.

McInnes has filed a defamation lawsuit against the Southern Poverty Law Center, which has designated the Proud Boys as a hate group. The suit claims the label has cost McInnes business opportunities and access to media platforms.
In October, Facebook and Instagram banned the Proud Boys and McInnes, citing their policies against hate groups.
“By leveraging its remarkable power and influence to deplatform and defund targeted groups and individuals such as Mr. McInnes, SPLC deprives those with which it disagrees of venues in which their points of view may be expressed, of income and ultimately of their most priceless possession, their reputations,’’ the lawsuit says.

SPLC President Richard Cohen paraphrased Franklin Delano Roosevelt in dismissing the suit as having no merit.
“Judge us by the enemies we’ve made,’’ Cohen said, invoking FDR. “Gavin McInnes has a history of making inflammatory statements about Muslims, women, and the transgender community. The fact that he’s upset with SPLC tells us that we’re doing our job exposing hate and extremism.’’