Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

How the Mueller Investigation Could Play Out for Trump

I think that ship has sailed. Everybody that felt that the dems were dismissive of them in 2016 will feel the same way in 2020 no matter who runs or what they say.


well they certainly haven't done a whole lot to quell that notion since then, in fact I'd say they've only doubled down and entrenched it dozens of times over with all the constant trump and MAGA demonization 24/7.
 
Last edited:
I'm not so sure about that. They're still playing the "Trump is racist" card
I don't imagine that's going anywhere either. But what I'm getting at is that I don't think that would flip any votes even if it stopped. If that was what it was about for someone, there's nothing any dem could say about it anyway.
 
well they certainly haven't done a whole lot to quell that notion since then, in fact I'd say they've only doubled down and entrenched it dozens of times over with all the constant trump and MAGA demonetization 24/7.


Doubling down is the only thing either party seems to be able to do anymore.
 
Doubling down is the only thing either party seems to be able to do anymore.

Trumps last Olive branch offered at the SOTU was rejected in less than 24 hours, the Ball looks to be moving forward again we all want to see EQUALITY applied justice under the law.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by tigermud
well they certainly haven't done a whole lot to quell that notion since then, in fact I'd say they've only doubled down and entrenched it dozens of times over with all the constant trump and MAGA demonetization 24/7.

Doubling down is the only thing either party seems to be able to do anymore.
"demonetization" ....is that the opposite of "monetizing" then?



As in, "the firm is looking for ways to monetize the research it has been producing over the past few years."


:hmm:
 
"demonetization" ....is that the opposite of "monetizing" then?



As in, "the firm is looking for ways to monetize the research it has been producing over the past few years."


:hmm:


oh you haters are always so quick to point out the occasional typo or wrong word usage, you know the auto corrects to tend to get people once in a while, it happens. I'm sure you knew what I meant should I go back and correct the post for you?

Demonization
 
Last edited:
well they certainly haven't done a whole lot to quell that notion since then, in fact I'd say they've only doubled down and entrenched it dozens of times over with all the constant trump and MAGA demonization 24/7.


There ya go Victors, I corrected it just for you! :tup:
 
They’re just trying to monetize the rumor it’s winding down while demonizing Mueller.
 
Not a part of the Mueller investigation, but I don't want to make a thread for this.



The ugliest things Trump has been accused of involve Jeffrey Epstein, who was friends with lots of powerful people including Bill Clinton. Epstein made a deal that allowed him to dodge most of the charges you'd think would come with the accusations exploiting lots of minors.


A Florida judge has now ruled that Trump's Secretary of Labor, Alex Acosta, who was a Federal prosecutor back then, broke the law when he hid the plea agreement from other victims.

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article226577419.html

...small world. Check out the legal team defending Epstein at the time: "which included Roy Black, Jack Goldberger, Alan Dershowitz, Jay Lefkowitz and former Whitewater and Clinton prosecutor Kenneth Starr."
 
Anyways I only heard of the proud boys yesterday or the day before and I would imagine I?m not going to be paying much attention to them going forward.


When the 1st leader stepped down, their lawyer served as leader for a little while. Now he's not a lawyer. At least not in Texas.


https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...c6eeb8ae4b0e37a1ed5feae?utm_source=reddit.com
Jason Lee Van Dyke, the suit-happy lawyer who represented and briefly led the Proud Boys extremist gang, has been suspended from practicing law in Texas after he threatened to kill a man he was suing, the State Bar of Texas confirmed.
 
He's only suspended, not disbarred.

The Texas Bar website is a little wonky... lists him as eligible to practice, but "retired."

When you click his profile, says he's been suspended, from 11/15/18 to 5/14/19.
 
that strikes me as an incredibly weak suspension, considering his public conduct, and the pending criminal issues around his false police report.

he was only suspended for something else too - issuing threats while representing another client - suspended and fined.

Weak as hell. the Illinois bar would've included all his racist shit online as bringing ill repute on the profession of law, and also the criminal issues and probably suspended him for longer than that.
 
Are you implying that The Mueller is basing the length of his investigation on whether or not Infowars is around or are you being facetious?

Both perhaps, they have gigs and gigs of crap from stone and Corsi two people that worked at IW that they likely haven’t gotten all through yet, surely they’ll find some process related intrigue to justify a raid on jones and seize his entire operation, then years later when no collusion there either, won’t matter, damage will have already been done and no more narrative questioning. mission accomplished, can’t have tin foil hat crazies questioning authority and official narratives Mr beales, that’s just not acceptable.
 
Last edited:
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/ju...s-what-public-will-see-mueller-report-n975816
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein on Monday appeared to be trying to dampen expectations about what the public might see of special counsel Robert Mueller's widely-expected report, noting that federal prosecutors typically don't describe conduct that falls outside the scope of criminal charges.
In prepared remarks, Rosenstein also praised Attorney General William Barr as "yet another example of a superb appointment that President Trump has made which I believe does demonstrate a commitment to the rule of law."

That struck some observers as something Rosenstein, who has been briefed on every aspect of the Mueller investigation, would not have said were he expecting a report that accuses Trump of misconduct.
 
Looks like the gears are shifting now from Russia collusion to well trump is a dirty business man and whatnot

https://www.wsj.com/articles/cohen-...-criminal-conduct-while-in-office-11551175201

NY Southern District is probably where this all ends up for trump.

I hope someday the same level of scrutiny is given to the other half of the 2016 election meddling DNC, FISA, Fake Dossier etc. and we all see equal justice under the law for where all those rabbit holes go too. I won't hold my breath though, once you're all successful at getting trump outta there, do you really believe the hard left is the answer? That only leads to equally assured misery for all, well everyone cept for the very elitists top .01%
 
Last edited:
Back
Top