- Thread Author
- #1
http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/9...stant-replay-proposal-mlb-executive-committee
Joe Torre submits replay proposal.
Joe Torre submits replay proposal.
By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!
Get StartedThe idea that a manager might be out of challenges when the final play of a game will affect the outcome, to me, defeats the entire purpose. There's no way that a manager can predict if there's going to be another blown call after he uses all his challenges. Why should a weak crew still be allowed to make a mistake that cannot be challenged but is reviewable?
And the non-reviewable plays will continue to plague teams because everyone will know when it's obvious that the call was blown.
And there's the obvious problem of the time of the blown call and how it affects baserunners who advance or who are called back to bases.
I'm not a big fan of challenges. I'm also not a big fan of replays with a play at any of the bases.
Maybe just get better umpires. More get together's so they can talk it out..
Getting 1 for the first 6 innings, might not be enough with the really bad umps, angel and bucknor among several.
All the ballparks will have the same number of cameras.
Mitch is on to something here....many times umpires will get a better look at a play than the umpire who made the call, but they very rarely overrule a call.
If an umpire sees a clear mistake, he should be obligated, no matter the embarrassment/annoyance of his fellow crew, to make the correct call.
But instead; the umpires act like a 3rd team on the field, and the game suffers because of it.
Now you might say that the HPU is "obligated" to reverse the call. I disagree. Lest you now introduce the option of field umpires reversing balls and strikes.
1st base and 3rd base umpires already occasionally make calls on check swings.
Any manager can ask a umpire to appeal to another umpire when a call is in question. Then it's up to the umpire to make the call to ask for help. Don Mattingly should have learned this when he argued this "out" call with Tim Welke and never thought to ask him to appeal to the HPU, who is responsible to watch this play unless there's a runner at third, which there was not.
Now you might say that the HPU is "obligated" to reverse the call. I disagree. Lest you now introduce the option of field umpires reversing balls and strikes.
No. I don't think strike zone would really be part of it. Nobody has a better look at the strike zone than the HPU. I also don't think balls/strikes should be part of the replay.
But plays at bases, foul/fair calls, catch/no-catch calls, should not need a managers appeal, if another umpire who sometimes has a better angle than the umpire who calls the play, clearly sees it differently. The umpires should strive to call the game as accurately as possible. Not just when asked to ask for help.
while I agree with you the umpires work together every day. I think the last thing they want to do is show up another ump in front of 40,000 people.
Any manager can ask a umpire to appeal to another umpire when a call is in question. Then it's up to the umpire to make the call to ask for help. Don Mattingly should have learned this when he argued this "out" call with Tim Welke and never thought to ask him to appeal to the HPU, who is responsible to watch this play unless there's a runner at third, which there was not.
Now you might say that the HPU is "obligated" to reverse the call. I disagree. Lest you now introduce the option of field umpires reversing balls and strikes.
http://www.nbcsports.com/joe-posnanski/mlb-blows-call-challenge-system
MLB blows call with the Challenge System.
from nbcsports
Founded in 2011, Detroit Sports Forum is a community of fanatics dedicated to teams like the Lions, Tigers, Pistons, Red Wings, Wolverines, and more. We live and breathe Detroit sports!