Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Lions ESPN Mailbag

michiganalex

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
1,987
http://espn.go.com/blog/detroit-lions/post/_/id/7175/lions-mailbag-all-about-the-draft

BLingris
@BLingris
@mikerothstein If the Lions take Watkins, what would receivers look like? AKA who takes 2 spot and where would broyles fit in? #lionsmailbag
Apr. 11, 2014ReplyRetweetFavorite

@mikerothstein: They would look extremely talented. The Lions would probably start three receivers most of the time -- Calvin Johnson on the outside for sure and then either Golden Tate or Sammy Watkins on the outside with the other player in the slot. The Nos. 4, 5, and 6 receivers would still be in question, but that combination would either be Ryan Broyles, Jeremy Ross and either Kris Durham or Kevin Ogletree. The team would probably keep three of those four, unless someone like Corey Fuller made a big leap to earn a roster spot instead of a practice squad spot.




Esdubbar
@Esdubbar
@mikerothstein #LionsMailbag we keep hearing about trading up, but in a deep draft, shouldn't the Lions consider trading down?
Apr. 11, 2014ReplyRetweetFavorite

@mikerothstein: Steve, I've always thought that Detroit should consider that possibility and it could happen, especially if the team doesn't like the options available at No. 10. As I wrote earlier this week, Detroit is more than one player away from being a true contender and should be concerned with building depth both for the present and the future. Stockpiling two or three more picks would not hurt there. Plus, if Detroit traded down a few slots -- not a lot, but a few -- one of the cornerbacks along with potentially safeties Ha Ha Clinton-Dix from Alabama and Calvin Pryor from Louisville could be there. So could defensive tackle Aaron Donald from Pitt and maybe even a linebacker or two. There are options.




mattbosko
@mattbosko
@mikerothstein How much should we read into the Lions stockpiling castaway CBs? No Justin Gilbert in their plans? #LionsMailbag
Apr. 11, 2014ReplyRetweetFavorite

@mikerothstein: Tough to say. If he is the best available player at No. 10, Detroit will likely take him. But I don't think he ends up being best available at that spot. There will be more talented players and the Lions have drafted a lot of cornerbacks over the years. It might be time to see whether or not they can really play -- and Jonte Green, Chris Greenwood and Bill Bentley have all shown flashes in the past. Detroit will likely take a corner somewhere, but the first round might not be that spot.




J_Beidoun
@J_Beid0un
@mikerothstein Showing so much interest in Watkins, Has there ever been a rumored trade like this that has came to fruition? #LionsMailbag
Apr. 11, 2014ReplyRetweetFavorite

@mikerothstein: Not that I can think of off the top of my head, but speculation like this kind of happens on a yearly basis and depending where you live, it happens more often than not. The Washington-St. Louis trade to go get Robert Griffin III seemed to be a big deal a couple of years back. There's also the Ricky Williams deal with New Orleans, and while that was a while ago, I vaguely remember it being anticipated heavily. You could debate how those trades worked.



Powered by ScribbleLive


Jordan from email asks Do you think the Lions will go all defense for the first three rounds of the draft? I've been seen more three round mock drafts that show us going first round cornerback, second round outside linebacker, third round strong safety.

Jordan,

While my opinion would treat that as a smart play, I don't think the Lions will end up doing that. They seem enamored with grabbing a wide receiver somewhere near the top of the draft -- certainly in the first three rounds. That's a fairly intelligent thing to do, especially since there is still a hole there and the draft will be pretty deep at the position in those rounds. So don't be surprised to see something like two defensive picks and a receiver or tight end in the first three rounds -- although that could change if the Lions end up making a trade.
 
Last edited:
I clicked the link, and it doesn't say anything that hasn't been said ad nauseum on this this board.

However, the comments on the story are amazing. One guy thinks we should take Evans because a combo of Evan, Burrelson, and Megatron would be unstoppable.

I love when knowledgeable sports fans comment on ESPN through Facebook. Makes my day.
 
are you 2 really that stupid? if u don't know how to read i was against drafting a WR in the first round
 
for sake of arguement if they did draft Watkins/Evans, who WOULD be the odd man out in the WR corp? Broyles seems obvious but who else?
 
are you 2 really that stupid? if u don't know how to read i was against drafting a WR in the first round

The amazing part to me is that you think it doesn't sound like you ONLY because you don't want a WR in the first round....
 
The amazing part to me is that you think it doesn't sound like you ONLY because you don't want a WR in the first round....

I don't mind a WR but as u have noticed in my mocks I waited til the 2nd round usually with Matthews from VAndy. I still stand by that pick. though i did change my mock with taking Barr @ #10 as an OLB
 
i never saw Nate's name is any of that anyway.
 
Last edited:
more then likely Broyles and fuller are SOL on this team unless they send them to the practice squad
 
I don't mind a WR but as u have noticed in my mocks I waited til the 2nd round usually with Matthews from VAndy. I still stand by that pick. though i did change my mock with taking Barr @ #10 as an OLB

I'll be honest you have a lot of mocks out there or at least have edited a lot of mocks. You have one mock, then someone says something you sort of agree with so you change it. Then someone says something you sort of agree with so you change it..etcetera etcetera. Bottom line I'm tired of your mocks and I bet most of the others are to..

Peace :cheers:
 
I'll be honest you have a lot of mocks out there or at least have edited a lot of mocks. You have one mock, then someone says something you sort of agree with so you change it. Then someone says something you sort of agree with so you change it..etcetera etcetera. Bottom line I'm tired of your mocks and I bet most of the others are to..[/B]
Peace :cheers:

Mitch I think we need to set up a poll to make sure we all agree with you
 
Mitch I think we need to set up a poll to make sure we all agree with you

I'm not sure how I would feel about that poll. How would you feel about that poll?

How do you feel about polls in general?
 
I change them mostly on player transactions and i do listen to those that present an strong. Argument

Sent from my N860 using Tapatalk 2
 
Just fuckin with ya..I don't watch a whole lot of college ball so there's no doubt you know more than myself.
 
I don't mind a WR but as u have noticed in my mocks I waited til the 2nd round usually with Matthews from VAndy. I still stand by that pick. though i did change my mock with taking Barr @ #10 as an OLB

Like the Matthews pick in the 2nd, but don't think he will be there when the Lions pick. Trading up shouldn't even be in the cards imo. Unless Watkins falls to us, trade down.
 
Back
Top