I just don't get -- here or on any message board -- the idea that there is any debate about coaching ability when it comes to the past two and current MICHIGAN head coaches.
Hoke, God Bless him, is a .500 MAC coach whose greatest victory is the BCS Sugar Bowl win with the team he inherited from Rich Rod.
Rich Rod, to his credit, took WVU to heights most never thought and did well at his alma mater. But outside of WVU and his first year in Tucson, he's been capable of losing 2-3 games/year everywhere he's been and is basically an "8-4" lifetime kind of guy.
Harbaugh has won NFC Titles, came within a power outage of winning the SuperBowl and did as much, or better, in his short time at Stanford than either Hoke or Rich Rod.
I just don't think it's even close and don't get the apologetic nature of those who want to make excuses for Rodriguez or Hoke. Harbaugh is head and shoulders above the other two and really, might be one of the best coaches in all of football.
Hell, look at Saban - he was average to below in the NFL and couldn't get back to college fast enough.
Maybe only Pete Carroll can say he has had the same success but he's also got about 15yrs on Harbaugh. Check back in 2030 and we shall see ...