By:
Advanced search…

Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

***shaking head in total confusion***

sggatecl said:
If this were any other shitty quarterback there wouldn't be near as much pissing and moaning. We just happened to pick the shitty quarterback that brings back bad memories.

I'm not happy with the Dan O choice but I also don't think it's the worst decision made this off season but judging by this thread you'd think they already benched Stafford in favor of him.
Click to expand...

Judging by this thread you would have thought the draft already happened too.
 
LKP said:
Post Hill's 2013 stats. 2012 he played half a quarter of football. 2011 he didn't play (Dan O did). Show me Hill's recent performances.
Click to expand...

What idiot said hill had recent performances?
 
mhughes0021 said:
What idiot said hill had recent performances?
Click to expand...

He's deemed a good backup and doesn't have recent performances. But you bash Dan O because he doesn't have any. Not Dan O's fault people didn't get hurt or they went with Glennon. Dan O had solid performances in 2011. Hill in 2010.
 
sggatecl said:
If this were any other shitty quarterback there wouldn't be near as much pissing and moaning. We just happened to pick the shitty quarterback that brings back bad memories.

I'm not happy with the Dan O choice but I also don't think it's the worst decision made this off season but judging by this thread you'd think they already benched Stafford in favor of him.
Click to expand...

I think some of us, me included, think the same. But no QB is safe from injury and I'd hate if he was to come in..I rather have Moore.

:cheers:
 
LKP said:
He's deemed a good backup and doesn't have recent performances. But you bash Dan O because he doesn't have any. Not Dan O's fault people didn't get hurt or they went with Glennon. Dan O had solid performances in 2011. Hill in 2010.
Click to expand...

Hill was deemed a good back up cause hes a good back up. dan O is deemed a shitty back up cause hes shit. When he gets replaced by a 4th rd qb as our back up qb that will prove to you he is a shitty back up. If mayhew doesn't replace him as our back up qb that will prove to you mayhew sucks ass at his job.
 
Last edited:
mhughes0021 said:
Hill was deemed a good back up cause hes a good back up. dan O is deemed a shitty back up cause hes shit. When he gets replaced by a 4th rd qb as our back up qb that will prove to you he is a shitty back up. If mayhew doesn't replace him as our back up qb that will prove to you mayhew sucks ass at his job.
Click to expand...

i'm surprised they signed Dan too. I'd prefer Moore over him as the #3 QB LOL
 
he signed for peanuts...the lions will draft a qb with one of their 4th rounders
 
mhughes0021 said:
ya, was a bad attempt at being sarcastic. Its easy to say "no biggie, we signed him for the vet min." But the vet min at 9 years is pretty high...
Click to expand...

635 k cap number so it doesn't matter. Gave us like 100 k less due top 51 rule
 
LKP said:
635 k cap number so it doesn't matter. Gave us like 100 k less due top 51 rule
Click to expand...

mayhews use the vet rule on muhlba,k, martin, ogletree, tapp and dan o..saved a mill
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

About Us

Founded in 2011, Detroit Sports Forum is a community of fanatics dedicated to teams like the Lions, Tigers, Pistons, Red Wings, Wolverines, and more. We live and breathe Detroit sports!

Stay Connected

Forum statistics

Threads
34,763
Messages
1,129,058
Members
977
Latest member
businesstalkmag

Affiliates

    Discussion Hub
Back
Top